Posted on 11/12/2004 11:24:19 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
News Alert: Scott Peterson Verdict to be announced today at 4:00 Eastern Time.
An average of better than 9 posts every minute for the first 2.5 hours of this thread. An average of one post every 6.6 seconds! Is that some kind of record or what?
No, she couldn't. Geragos wouldn't let her go in unless she went in with a member of his staff.
Now Sharon and Laci's friends can go into HER house and remember her.
What little I have watched Nancy, she was adament that there was nothing to convict Scott on.
I missed her crying on TV, but I just assumed that she is upset that he got the guilty verdict.
The judge should not have allowed the jumping in the boat. This will mean Scott gets an appeal
Ever seen a live debate thread?
I just hope that jerk is really guilty.
Geragos has really lost what little reputation he had left, I think. And keeping a mother from that nursery is beyond the pale.
.
Us Freepers just LOVE Justice..!!!
.
Is it true that Scott's dad wasn't there today?
Simple. Scott was just exercising his constitutional rights, as defined by Mr. Justice Kennedy:
"At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life."
I am wondering what you all think went wrong with Scott that he could do something like this. Did Jackie and Lee Petersen fail as parnets in some way, or was he just born evil?
BTW: Glad I was wrong when I said he's be found NOT guilty.
Will the 2nd degree murder of his unborn son have an impact on the abortion mills? Partial Birth Abortion? I won't be surprised if NARAL pays for part of Peterson's appeal.
Smart and pretty and sexy.
She's better these days than she was when she worked for Clinton back during impeachment. Then I thought of her as like a Norah O'Donnell type--beautiful but vacant in an evil way. But there's always hope and she seems to have shaped up and acquired some common sense. Then again, even Nancy Grace thought Clinton was getting a bum rap and she can usually spot a perp a mile away. Bias will cloud you, I guess.
Well the evidence is all circumstantial...and a man should not get the death penality when there is NOT conclusive proof. One hair doesn't do it...
Yep, just an unlucky fisherman 90 miles from home on Christmas eve.
Got meds?
There are lots of errors in any trial. But hardly ever do they rise above the level of "harmless error."
There were no errors in this case that will result in an overturning of this verdict.
Appeal is guaranteed.
Prevailing on appeal is a problem.
The abortion rights people will be wanting to join in order to overturn the Conner verdict because an unborn child is not allowed to be human.
Allowing the jurrors to "test" the boat was a mistake especially when the defense was not allowed to show their little video demonstration. (which the prosecution was free to duplicate and disprove)
There is the removal of the jurrors. Why were they all removed will be examined.
Well, not so. The judge on Fox thinks so and so does Greta...they both think the judge of the case made big mistakes...and the "testing" of evidence by a juror will allow for an appeal.
Is this the first case to be tried unter Laci's Law?
That would be cool, wouldn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.