Posted on 11/10/2004 12:48:29 AM PST by esryle
DALLAS -- Six men, dressed in black fatigues with the word "Police" stenciled on the backs of the shirts, stormed a house in Southeast Dallas Tuesday morning at about 10:30, according to police. The men reportedly were armed with automatic weapons, broke windows and terrorized the family living in the 9400 block of Bermuda Road.
Witnesses said the men spoke English and Spanish. They shouted, "Policia," or police, and manhandled the family's patriarch. Two of the men used weapons to assault Maria Lopez (pictured, left), who tried to protect her 3-week-old infant.
"Well, the female, she was pretty much assaulted with a gun," Officer Y.M. Abrom said. "With one of the AK-47s. She was pistol-whipped to the face."
The men reportedly were looking for marijuana at the house, which also serves as a welding business. They failed to find any drugs at the location, and moved on to a vacant house on the same street.
There, they allegedly accosted five construction workers. The contractors were forced to the ground, and the robbers took the workers' wallets. The suspects fled in two vehicles.
Lopez received stitches at an area hospital.
Investigators called the suspects "take-over bandit copycats," referring to a recent case involving robbers armed with automatic weapons who stormed businesses.
No, you didn't. You evaded.
I asked what you would do.
I did not ask for your resume.
I didn't ask how friendly you were with the local law enforcement.
I asked you the same question, and I even modified it for you based on the weasel-out answers you gave.
And again you wouldn't answer.
Your answers are as vacant as your ability to defend your positions honestly. You're all about your little attacks and name calling, and claiming victory when all you've managed to do is make yourself look like a fool.
LOL! By telling you the truth? Wow! No wonder you scored the first point in blaming the cops for the actions of the criminals...your reality is screwed up.
"No, they aren't hiring and I doubt you have the qualifications anyway. But if you keep looking I'm sure you can find something as equally unchallenging."
Once again proving you are the intellectual equivalent of a kid on the play ground saying "I know what you are but what am I???".
Can't defend any of your positions, won't answer direct questions, but will try to make smart aleck remarks that just look pathetic.
You're bobbing and weaving like a bad boxer. And the punches you're trying to throw some how manage to hit you back in your own face.
Way to go, CWOjackson - maybe one day you'll say something clever or insighful. And on that day, we'll have a parade in your honor.
LOL! I answered your direct question, you didn't like the answer to your continue to demonstration your proclivity to whine and throw a remarkable little tantrum.
Flashy, I followed it back and he did dodge your question. This is like trying to teach a pig to dance. Give it up.
Again, more evasion. You're pathetic, you know that?
Answer either one of the questions I posed to you. I adjusted it for your first non-answer.
The silence from you on real questions is deafening.
Yes, a direct answer is dodging...for some people obviously.
LOL! Yes, I know that you just don't like the truth.
And so you duck. What if you did not know the police well, or did not know they knew you well?
I know it's pointless. There are a subset here who can't engage in a debate or defend their positions at all - all they can do is throw around insults and act blustery.
Kinda like the loud, obnoxious guy at a bar who thinks because he's yelling the loudest he's the one everyone should listen to.
But at least his shallow, substance free posting style can be revealed for all to see. He's made a fool of himself here over and over.
You are saying you are fortunate enough not to be in that situation. Well whoopdedoo wonderful! What for someone not so fortunate?
You should ask them.
Could be stolen. If you are found with them sometime in the future, guess who gets the blame.
Assuming that those guns were all that were in the van.
You have no concern for someone not in the circumstances you enjoy. Well have a happy selfishness.
Suggesting that you ask someone their reaction to a hypothetical situation is selfish. That's even more tortured then the perpetually changing hypothetical. I guess it would appear selfish when your arguments are without merit.
Selected events from CWOJackson's school years:
Geography test:
Question: What is the capital of Iowa?
CWOJackson: I've never been to Iowa, so why should I have to know what the capital is?
History Test:
Question: Where did the wright brothers first fly their plane?
CWOJackson: I've never flown on a plane. I don't have to answer that question.
Math Test:
Question: You have 5 apples. You sell 3 of them for 5 cents each. You sell the remaining apples for 4 cents each. How much money do you have?
CWOJackson: I don't like apples.
Afterwards, there is a discussion:
Teacher: CWOJackson, you failed all the tests.
CWOJackson: What? I answered every question!?!?!?
Teacher: Well, you gave an answer, but they didn't have anything to do with the question being asked.
CWOJackson: Losertarian!!!!
You could have answered the question civilly, along the lines of "well, because of my circumstances, that would never happen to me, BUT if I did not have those circumstances, I think that I would ... whatever ..."
Instead you play parsing lawyer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.