Posted on 11/09/2004 8:23:53 AM PST by Michael Goldsberry
Edited on 11/09/2004 8:39:31 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
You lose. First person to bring Hitler into an argument is an automatic loser.
Bingo!
You may not.
I don't think you're a pervert if you ask questions about me and mine. Nosy, yes.
You seemed to have strayed just a tad to try to make your point. I though we were discussing pharmacists and BCPs.
Not funny.
If you want to see all the posts he/she has made, go to his/her history and read them. They are uniformly liberal. I have actually caught this person before. A very crafty troll, but not crafty enough to evade the justice of the best troll detective on FR. LOL
Is there a particular reason why you think it is ok to keep the script?
You may wish to go back and re-read my post #40.
When you do, you will note that I was responding to another person who posted this:
"Pharmacists job is to fill the Prescription, not to moralize or judge."
In other words, my response was directed at a person who, it appeared t me, was trying to deny a pharmacist the right to choose -- specifically, the right to choose not to fill a prescription.
I honestly do not see what that has to do with two acts which, in my own view, are quite illegal -- the first being holding onto property that is not your own, and the second being assault and battery.
Perhaps you could explain the connection?
As I have said, I do not see why the pharmacist kept the script. He could have refused to fill it, and sent her elsewhere.
Liberals are an endangered species here. The countdown has begun.
Speaking of pills, I wish they made one that cured arrogance.
The point is that CVS does support everything the pharmacist did, with the exception of not handing back the prescription.
It wasn't so much directed at you as it was correcting an important fact left out by the obviously biased Yahoo story.
It is not assualt to use physical force to retrieve that which has been stolen from you at the point at which it was stolen.
Is there a particular post where I said that?
What I personally would have done is called the police right then and there. Maybe they could have convinced the pharmacist to give it back.
You in need of that? I hope the pharmacist fills it in that case. LOL
LOL!
That has been my position this entire thread, and honestly, is the only correct position. If the pharmacist has an agreement with the employer regarding the ability to deny certain prescriptions that is fine. Absent that agreement the pharmacist should fill all prescriptions. And under no circumstances should the pharmacist steal a customers perscription.
LOL. Just keep patting yourself on the back. It's amusing to watch.
Sorry if I offended you with the self-flagellate comment. But if he was that torn up about returning the prescription......
I doubt very much that "most Christians" think either one is murder.
Most Christians believe life begins at conception. Thus preventing implantation of a fertilized egg would be murder.
There is also concern about the health effects on the child, if it manages to implant anyway of exposure to such a high dose of hormones.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.