Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which Dem Senators should we target for defeat in 2006? (Vanity)
11/06/2004 | Deaconjim

Posted on 11/06/2004 3:54:21 AM PST by deaconjim

Ok, we've got two years. We know we need to pick up at least 6 seats. Assuming that we won't have a 100% success rate, we should probably choose at least 8-10 Democrat (or independent) seats to work on.

We have seen that we can make a difference in the outcome of elections. Let's put ourselves to work and help get W a fillabuster proof Senate.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; democrats; elections; hildabeast; hitlery; senate; strategy; tpd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 last
To: deaconjim

We tell FReepers in the states in question to start thinking about who should run for us in those potentially competitive races, and to contact potential candidates. We also need to stay abreast of the possible Senate primaries in order to ensure that we end up nominating our best candidate.


241 posted on 11/08/2004 7:24:40 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim
Which Dem Senators should we target for defeat in 2006? (Vanity)

1) Mary landreu of Louisiana. She said she would support the president's judicial nominees but that was a lie. I think that there is a good chance that we can Dashcle her.

2) Target the remaining Dems in the South.

242 posted on 11/08/2004 11:42:14 AM PST by chronotrigger (heart of dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim
1. Conrad's first name is Kent -- a minor point for the record. Hoeven should be able to give him a run for his money in ND. Again, even if we don't win these seats, we need to contest them, and not just write them off.

2. Is there any hard evidence that Nelson is considering jumping to the GOP in Nebraska. And is he someone we would want?

243 posted on 11/08/2004 12:32:47 PM PST by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: jporcus

How about Mel Gibson?


244 posted on 11/08/2004 3:48:12 PM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Limit myself to only three?????

How about any pubbie who signed off on or voted for any one or more of the following:

"No child left behind" (NOWHERE is FedGov authorized to be involved in education)

The prescription drug act (ditto for meds or medical care)

The TORRENT of spending NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED in and by the Constitution,,, which accounts for probably 2/3 of the federal budget...
(how much more do you need???)



So in otherwords, like most "PaeloConservatives", you don't realy have any specfics just they usual "We-Hate-Everyone" rant. Sorry, that is NOT a platform to govern on.


245 posted on 11/08/2004 4:12:44 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

I don't see Santorum having any problems. It may be a blue state, but it is a mild blue state and Santorum is in a leadership position.

Any prospective challengers will have a better shot at waiting another 4 years and taking a possible open seat


246 posted on 11/09/2004 10:10:13 AM PST by ConservativeLawStudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: BB2
It won't matter a hoot, unless we ALL contact our Representatives, and Senators, and plead with them to introduce measures to eliminate VOTER FRAUD.

Official photo I.D. with name, address, social security number, for Heaven's sakes!

Here! Here! There is not enough being said or done about this on this forum. I suspect the resident libertarians are more concerned about their privacy than eliminating voter fraud- yes, the same ones who were decrying the Patriot Act.

247 posted on 11/09/2004 4:48:08 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Actually, I believe that the Constitution for the United States is PLENTY enough platform for what little governance we require. Since well over 90 percent of what FedGov does is outside its lawful charter, I have no doubt it would not be missed by most Americans. The beneficiaries of FedGov's plunder will, no doubt, howl and whine, but so f'ing what. They can deal with it and find another way to get by. If this includes you, I shouldn't wonder that you try hanging the "paleo," everybody-hater label on someone who isn't included. Poor you.


248 posted on 11/09/2004 7:47:32 PM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I don't recommend heavy out-of-state targeting of Jeffords. That will piss Vermonters off enough to vote for him. They don't like "flatlanders" messing in their elections.

Awhile ago a Massachusetts Republican named Jack McMullen moved up here to run against Pat Leahy for Senate.
People were so incensed about his "carpetbagging" that in the primary they voted for an 80 year old dairy farmer named Fred Tuttle who ran as a joke (promo for the "A Man with A Plan" movie) instead. Tuttle won with about 80% of the vote.

Even the non-left Vermonters are stubborn as rocks. If they sense out-of-state interference all hell will break loose.

LQ


249 posted on 11/10/2004 8:26:47 AM PST by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim
Focusing on our threatened candidates, like Santorum, is the place to start. Then look at the weak dems or dems in red states.

One thing we can do now is start lining up new mid-term voters. The election is still fresh in everybody's mind. If you run across someone who voted for the first time or only votes in Presidential elections, work on getting them to see the importance of giving President Bush a Senate that will work with him.

Set a goal for yourself of 10, 15, 25 or 50 new midterm voters. Don't badger them, but every couple of months let them know how important it is to vote every election. When even a small election is coming up, remind them of the issues and to vote. Soon they will become faithful and involved voters.

Just a little anecdote. My husband works with a 25 year old and they drive to jobs with each other often. My husband would put on Laura Ingraham's radio show. The kid was soaking it all in, but wanted to hear the other side. So they switched over to Air America. Even a mostly uninformed non voting kid knew it was crap. He voted his first time for BUSH.

250 posted on 11/10/2004 9:26:10 AM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen

hmmmm... i guess in smaller states it is more noticable when an out-of-towner comes in. Maybe we can just support whoever is nominated there with out of state donations? I am sure Jumpin' jim or wheover the Dems nominate will get some too.


251 posted on 11/10/2004 9:29:18 AM PST by traviskicks (Poverty has no causes. Only prosperity has causes. - Jane Jacobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: All
Rudy against Hillaruh in 2006. The Dems will lose alot of support in NYC and the surrounding counties, spelling a sure win for Rudy in NY. When is bloombergs re-election? Thats sure to be a big fight.

In 2008, it looks like Rudy may run, if he doesnt, he's likely to be tapped for VP, the name "Rudy Giuliani" Will also influence the Youth vote who saw giuliani rise up in the biggest event of their lives. I think McCain had a chance, until he came out against Bush...again

Another possible VP is Condi Rice. Rudy\Rice...That could spell trouble for Dems, and force major competiion for Democratic Bases. (Blacks, Women, New York and California.)

If Hillaruh is ousted from her throne in 2006, The likely candidate will be pretty boy Edwards. If he cant beat a War-time, modiocre economy president, what thinks he can beat "America's Mayor"
252 posted on 11/12/2004 3:25:45 PM PST by CJR812 (Rudy '08!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson