Posted on 10/28/2004 9:31:41 AM PDT by stevejackson
Senator John Kerry is once again making claims that he cannot substantiate. He charges that President Bushs misjudgments led to the disappearance of 380 tons of explosives from the Iraqi al-Qaqaa facility, and that these explosives have been used against U.S. troops -- even though there is no proof for such accusations. While the Kerry campaign has already released a television ad making such allegations, they simultaneously have backed off from the same charges.
Senator Kerrys TV ad states:
The obligation of a Commander in Chief is to keep our country safe. In Iraq, George Bush has overextended our troops and now failed to secure 380 tons of deadly explosives. The kind used for attacks in Iraq, and for terrorist bombings. His Iraq misjudgments put our soldiers at risk, and make our country less secure. And all he offers is more of the same. As President, I'll bring a fresh start to protect our troops and our nation. I'm John Kerry and I approved this message.
When pressed Tuesday about the al-Qaqaa allegations, Richard Holbrooke, one of Kerrys top advisors, said:
You don't know the truth and I don't know the truth. I don't know the truth.
Another Kerry campaign advisor, Mike McCurry, said Wednesday:
We are not suggesting that we know for certain that the material from that facility has been used. There is good evidence that some of that material could have been used, but we're not there, we're not on the ground, we can't establish that with certainty. And I think that's why you've heard Senator Kerry be very careful about that it 'could be,' 'can be,' 'might be' because we just don't know on that.
The terms could be, can be, and might be do not appear in the Kerry TV ad. According CNN.com, a spokeswoman for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said she
did not know whether some of the explosives may have been used in past attacks.
No one is certain what really did happen to the explosives -- yet. The National Review points out:
the fairly obvious fact that looters could not have stuffed 380 tons of explosives into shopping bags. To transport that much material would have required about 38 large trucks 10 tons per truck. Before the U.S. invasion, such truck convoys moved about Iraq freely. Once the U.S. was in occupation, that kind of effort could hardly have gone unnoticed.
Once again, John Kerry is saying anything he thinks will win him the general election next week -- whether it be truthful or not. And he says Bush misled us?
http://netwmd.com/articles/article763.html
To just prove how out of touch Kerry is, he is still running around the country spewing this BS.
Well I would imagine that with the Oil for Food scam going on in the UN, Why would it be a stretch of the imagination to surmise that the UN, over and above the ELbaradi connection is linked to the movement of, not only the the Al QAA CA explosives, but also the WMD !!
El Ca-Ca Gate has not played out like kerry hoped. Yhey are bound to be trying to stir up October Surprise Part II--maybe later today.
This is the cover story for the Real Breaking News of Kerry's Connection with the VC/NVN during 1971. The stories have been posted at Worldnet daily since Oct 26,2004 at 1 AM. These are not Hurricain Dan's papers, they are valid, have been validated at Texas Tech
(ain't much of a tiper)
I would like to know why there seems to be no one out there spreading this story around. I saw the article several days ago.
See this:
No IAEA Seals on Al-Qaqaa Bunkers in KSTP Video
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1260171/posts
I don't !! It's unbelievable. I know that FOX seems to have been scared so bad they look like they dirtied their pants. A few of my friends have emailed the whole article to them. One fellow said he emailed it to Ann Coulter.
Wonder why FR pulled that thread on it today?
Don't know that they did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.