1 posted on
10/26/2004 7:36:37 PM PDT by
ckilmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: ckilmer
because that's the way the clock hands go!
2 posted on
10/26/2004 7:37:32 PM PDT by
eyespysomething
(Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
To: ckilmer
Now if they could only figure out why voter fraud only flows in favor of the Democrats...
5 posted on
10/26/2004 7:38:28 PM PDT by
CurlyBill
(Voter Fraud is one of the primary campaign strategies of the Democrats!)
To: ckilmer
""You can turn an egg into an omelet, but not an omelet into an egg," Carroll said. "Try feeding the omelet to a chicken.
8 posted on
10/26/2004 7:40:29 PM PDT by
bayourod
(Old Media news is poll driven, not event driven, not fact driven, not newsworthy driven.)
To: ckilmer
Nahhh, time is circular.
And where would a discussion thread about time be without, "Time flies like the wind. And fruit flies like bananas."
9 posted on
10/26/2004 7:40:38 PM PDT by
Chummy
(RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
To: ckilmer
That's assuming dimension Time flows ... it might also just be oriented in a fashion 'like' past is linear, present is planar, and future is volumetric.
11 posted on
10/26/2004 7:41:06 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: ckilmer
"Scientists blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah-blah, blah-blah-blah..."
If I had a nickel...
12 posted on
10/26/2004 7:41:23 PM PDT by
ApesForEvolution
(You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
To: ckilmer
If it didn't it would slosh.
15 posted on
10/26/2004 7:42:25 PM PDT by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
To: ckilmer
16 posted on
10/26/2004 7:42:25 PM PDT by
HawaiianGecko
(Member of the PajamaNati for 1/6th of a year)
To: ckilmer
Just think we all get to pay for this drivel thanks to government grants.
20 posted on
10/26/2004 7:43:23 PM PDT by
carlr
To: ckilmer
![](http://216.77.188.54/coDataImages/p/Groups/224/224535/folders/164132/1273085USA-09.gif)
Good post; pathetic theory.
Entropy is unusable energy, not necessarily disorder. The Big Bang theory defies our laws of physics, so that sort of event probably never happened. Time won't run backwards just because the universe starts contracting, etc...
22 posted on
10/26/2004 7:44:07 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: ckilmer
Good read: "In Entropy's Jaws" by Robert Silverberg.
23 posted on
10/26/2004 7:44:26 PM PDT by
glock rocks
(I'm not sure what Van Helsing is shooting, but I want one)
To: ckilmer
It's a part of Karl Rove's evil plan to prevent liberals from changing the past.
24 posted on
10/26/2004 7:45:11 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: ckilmer
Time is only a perception. It doesn't really exist.
27 posted on
10/26/2004 7:45:59 PM PDT by
Se7eN
To: RadioAstronomer
To: ckilmer
All I know is that in my younger years I often wished fervently that I could make time flow backwards - usually when I woke up with a girl who somehow was far less attractive than she was at last call.
29 posted on
10/26/2004 7:46:10 PM PDT by
AggieCPA
(Howdy, Ags!)
To: ckilmer
Carroll and Chen's research addresses two ambitious questions: why does time flow in only one direction? How do they know it does? Perhaps we only perceive it flowing in one direction only because we're in an accelerated frame of reference with respect to time.
34 posted on
10/26/2004 7:47:51 PM PDT by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: ckilmer
If time could move frontwards and backwards, John Kerry could take back his unvoting for the $87 billion before his voting for it. Does that make sense?
39 posted on
10/26/2004 7:49:10 PM PDT by
eagle11
(If you value America's future.....vote GWBush on Nov 2nd!!!)
To: ckilmer; TaxRelief
You can always increase the entropy more by creating a new universe and allowing it to expand and cool off," Carroll explained. Oh, wow! I think we'll try this for a science project tomorrow!
40 posted on
10/26/2004 7:49:35 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(I'm not making this up.)
To: ckilmer
My first reaction to the headline "SAY WHAT?"
41 posted on
10/26/2004 7:49:43 PM PDT by
GeronL
(FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
To: ckilmer
Science has a way of claiming to have all the answers of history, and yet it has not satisfactorily defined time itself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson