Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9 percent of voters polled by ABC have voted Bush 51 % and the Lair 47%
5 PM ABC News | 10-26-04 | ABC News Radio

Posted on 10/26/2004 2:11:15 PM PDT by The Klingon

The news at 5 said of the 9% who reported 51% voted for Bush and 47 % voted for Kerry


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: earlyvote; gwb2004; kewl; poll; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: The Klingon

9 Percent of Likely Voters Have Voted Via Absentee Ballot or Early Voting

Analysis
By GARY LANGER

Oct. 26, 2004-- While the 2004 election is locked in a virtual dead heat, for nearly one in 10 likely voters it's all over but the counting: They've already cast their ballots.

Nine percent of "likely" voters in the ABC News tracking poll say they've voted for president, either by absentee ballot or early voting, a number that's jumped in the last week. Fifty-one percent say they went for George W. Bush, 47 percent for John Kerry.

That doesn't mean Bush is "winning" the absentee vote; the difference is within sampling tolerances. And among all likely voters, including those waiting for Election Day, the race is essentially tied: Forty-nine percent support Kerry and 48 percent Bush, with 1 percent for Ralph Nader in interviews Friday through Monday.

That's the same as Monday's tracking result. The race tightened slightly from last week because Saturday and Sunday were two of Kerry's three best days since this tracking poll began Oct. 1; Monday, though, was a bit better for Bush. Tracking polls average results across days to build a reliable sample.

Early Birds

There's been a recent jump in early voting: The number of registered voters who say they've already voted has risen from 1 percent in the first three weeks of ABC's tracking poll, through last Thursday, to 7 percent now. It reaches 9 percent when computed among the ranks of likely voters only.

Early voting is more prevalent in the West than in other regions. (Oregon is one reason — all voting there is by mail — and there's high absentee voting in several other Western states.) Early voters are more likely to be older, women and following the race very closely. They're also a bit more likely to be Republicans than Democrats.

As with any small subgroup, there's greater sampling variability in data on early voters. Given the increased opportunities for early voting in many states, they bear watching as their ranks grow in the coming days.

Movables

Movable voters, those who say their minds aren't definitely made up, are another group to watch. This group is down to 9 percent of all likely voters, compared with 14 percent at the start of tracking, and movables divide by 42 percent to 41 percent between Bush and Kerry in this poll.

Bush did as well or better with movables last week; they move, and still can. And an open question is how many of them actually will vote: Movables are following the campaign much less closely than other likely voters (32 percent "very closely," compared with 66 percent among those who've got a definite preference). That suggests less commitment to the process among movables.

Referendum

Incumbent elections often are described as a referendum on the sitting president, which helps explain the close race. Precisely as they divide on the horse race, likely voters split 48 percent to 49 percent on whether Bush does or doesn't deserve a second term.

That view is highly partisan, marked by the same sharp divisions as vote preferences. Ninety percent of Republicans say Bush deserves a second term; 86 percent of Democrats (and 52 percent of independents) say he does not. Fifty-five percent of whites say he's earned another term, but 76 percent of minorities say not. Nearly three-quarters of evangelical white Protestants say yes; two-thirds of the nonreligious, no.

The "deserves re-election" number for Bush is down from 54 percent after his convention, when he was at a peak. The race, like the answer to this question, has tightened since.

Oct. 26, 2004--  Whatever the outcome of the election, such results underscore the difficultly Bush has had — and perhaps any president might encounter in this polarized electorate — achieving his goal of being "a uniter, not a divider."

Issues and Groups

Issue priorities are holding steady, with a close division among the top three: the economy, cited by 24 percent of likely voters as most important in their vote; the war in Iraq, 22 percent; and terrorism, 21 percent.

Terrorism, Bush's best issue, peaked higher, at 28 percent, after his convention. Kerry's been trying, with some success, to drive it down and other issues up in importance, a critically important factor in this competitive race.

Among groups, there's a sharp regional difference in vote preferences: Kerry ahead by 56 percent to 41 percent in his home region, the Northeast, and by 54 percent to 45 percent in the West. It's a 52 percent-46 percent Bush-Kerry race in the most populous region, the South, and a 50 percent-46 percent Bush-Kerry contest in the Midwest. The biggest difference from 2000 is the West, better at the moment for Kerry than it was for Al Gore.

Kerry continues to be strong in core Democratic groups, Bush in the Republican base, with an unusual split in the two major swing groups: Independents, now 51 percent-44 percent Kerry-Bush, and white Catholics, 52 percent-44 percent Bush-Kerry. In exit polls since 1980, these two groups have sided with the same candidate, and he's won the presidency.

Religion, or the lack thereof, has its customarily strong influence. Apart from white Catholics, the most centrist large religious group, white Protestants prefer Bush by 30 points, 64 percent to 34 percent; that includes evangelical white Protestants, by a wider 71 percent to 28 percent, and non-evangelical white Protestants by 57 percent to 41 percent. People who profess no religion, 12 percent of likely voters, favor Kerry by 67 percent to 31 percent.

Methodology

This poll was conducted Oct. 22-25 among a random national sample of 2,414 adults, including 2,084 registered voters and 1,666 likely voters. The results have a 2.5-point error margin for the likely voter sample. ABC News and The Washington Post are sharing data collection for this tracking poll, then independently applying their own models to arrive at likely voter estimates. Sampling, data collection and tabulation were done by TNS of Horsham, Pa.


101 posted on 10/26/2004 3:12:21 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Not this year are such early voters mostly out-of-country or military. Many states have instituted the "reform" of allowing early voting as a matter of right, rather than having to offer some valid excuse and requesting an absentee ballot. This will be another election in which the results of a "reform" turn out "worse than expected."

Early voting will also probably be more Republican than voting on election day. It takes a little more education, intent and organization for anyone to vote early, rather than just show up and vote on election day. Decades of experience indicate that absentee votes in any jurisdiction almost always break slightly more Republican than the walk-in vote in the same jurisdiction.

Still, this news about people who have already voted this year is good news for Bush and bad news for Kerry.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "A Political Addict Prepares for Winter"

102 posted on 10/26/2004 3:17:37 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas; All
This is NOT an exit poll. This is a standard poll, probably conducted by phone, of citizens who say they have ALREADY voted. Assuming people are telling the truth when they say they have already voted, this functions similar to an exit poll in predicting how others will vote.

Because of the "reform" in many states of allowing anyone to vote early without any excuse or reason or application, there are many more people voting early this year than ever before. That means there are enough people out there who can be reached by a poll to get a fair sample and report results.

Does that help?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "A Political Addict Prepares for Winter"

103 posted on 10/26/2004 3:22:58 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: somerville
Thanks! Yes, it was AOK! Hopefully, NYC will see the light one day, but I won't hold my breath.

Today, one of my co-workers thought he would just go by and quickly vote on the way back to the shop. Ha, ha!

He was surprised to see about 125 people in a line going outside the supervisor of elections office in Ocala.

Needless to say, he decided to vote another time.

Also, on my previous post I failed to mention that we have the option to choose absentee instead of the paper ballot. Therefore, Florida has bent over backwards to counter those who might accuse Republicans of voter fraud.

104 posted on 10/26/2004 3:30:23 PM PDT by Florida native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: familyop; The Klingon; fortheDeclaration

It appears that 9% of the likely voters polled indicated that they had already voted and 51% said they voted for Bush and 47% said they voted for Kerry. Apparently 2% did not indicate who they voted for or they voted for a third party candidate.

My experience with early vote is that it usually is a good indicator of the final vote. In my own election the early vote had me ahead 58.4% to 41.6% and that was the final tally. Most other races showed similar results.

However, there are exceptions to the rule.

I can find no information on which states were polled.

Here in Texas, Fort Bend County, Tom DeLay's home county, early voting is running at twice the early vote of the 2000 Presidential Election. I've heard reports that Travis County (the people's republic of Austin) has a slightly higher turnout, but that tradional Democrat strongholds along the Mexican border actually have a lower turnout that in 2000.

At this point, in Texas at least, Kerry is not generating any enthusiasm. That may be because the Dems believe it is useless to go vote, since Bush will carry Texas by a big margin.


105 posted on 10/26/2004 3:34:12 PM PDT by AndyMeyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers
"I can find no information on which states were polled."

Thank you for your reply. The following is quoted from comment #101, above. It was a strange poll, IMO.

"This poll was conducted Oct. 22-25 among a random national sample of 2,414 adults, including 2,084 registered voters and 1,666 likely voters. The results have a 2.5-point error margin for the likely voter sample. ABC News and The Washington Post are sharing data collection for this tracking poll, then independently applying their own models to arrive at likely voter estimates. Sampling, data collection and tabulation were done by TNS of Horsham, Pa."
106 posted on 10/26/2004 3:41:23 PM PDT by familyop (Receive, adhere, listen, dissolve, entice and launch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Uh-51% we win!

Heh, at least until the rats show up with another 51% percent. New rat-math, ya know...

107 posted on 10/26/2004 3:45:23 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Texas has had early voting since 1992 I believe it is.... You can only get a mail in ballot now for very few selected reasons since there are many days in which to cast your vote in person. In the 2000 General early votes made up some 20.1 % of the votes and 16.8% of the votes cast in 1996 were early votes. Some counties will exceed 30% in early voting.

In the top 15 counties currently with four more days to be counted there have been some 1.3 million early votes cast out of some 8.1 milion registered votes in these counties, 15.91%.


108 posted on 10/26/2004 3:51:24 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers

http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/earlyvoting/index.shtml

Early voting turnout in the top 15 counties in Texas..... It looks to be somewhat higher than in 2000.


109 posted on 10/26/2004 3:53:26 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I like my den, myself, but I avoid the Lair like a duck avoids orange sauce.

By the time orange sauce is a thought, the duck's goose is cooked.

But a choked chicken is a happy chicken! :-)

110 posted on 10/26/2004 4:00:02 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (Typing incoherently on FR since May '98.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fromunda; FairOpinion; MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Lady Jag; Howlin; ...


"This post (thread) is meaningless."

-- 8 Day Political Genius




fromunda

Since Oct 19, 2004

view home page, enter name:

~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~
Return

fromunda hasn't created an about page.


111 posted on 10/26/2004 4:21:14 PM PDT by devolve ( -HEINZ-KERRY - LIFESTYLES Of The RICH & FLAMING! - http://pro.lookingat.us/ThisOldDump.html --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Klingon

As reported on McKneel-Lair.


112 posted on 10/26/2004 4:22:36 PM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fromunda
Almost 3,000,000 people voted in North Carolina in the 2000 presidential election.

As of this Saturday, over 500,000 will have voted.

Want to change you nasty posts?

113 posted on 10/26/2004 4:25:21 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: devolve

114 posted on 10/26/2004 4:31:00 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Almost 3,000,000 people voted in North Carolina in the 2000 presidential election. As of this Saturday, over 500,000 will have voted.

Wow, I didn't realize so many people were voting early.

If these early polls show Bush leading, that is really encouraging.

115 posted on 10/26/2004 4:34:06 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory; Howlin
Texas, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, Colorado, Tennessee, Virginia. I think that's it. Nothing big in the north.

And WV

Can somebody (anybody) dig up the total population that voted in each of those states in 2000 and show it as % for Bush and Gore? I think that would show us how the 'delta' in this year's election is trending.

NOTE: Do not average the % of each state - need actual number of votes.

116 posted on 10/26/2004 4:34:16 PM PDT by 11th_VA (VRWC Local 1077)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; fromunda

As of this Saturday, over 500,000 will have voted.



In Texas through Monday there have been almost 1.3 million that have voted in the top 15 counties..... Four more days to go. There will be over 20% of the registered voters exercise the early vote option this year.....


117 posted on 10/26/2004 4:37:33 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: deport

RE: Early voting v absentee ballots. These are two different processes. The exit polling information would only apply to the early voters, correct?


118 posted on 10/26/2004 4:40:17 PM PDT by berkeleybeej (Jump Dan, Jump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0876793.html


119 posted on 10/26/2004 4:40:33 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: The Klingon
I would think that it would be them dems, still burning from the "stolen" election of 2000, and determined to NOT let it happen again, that would be walking away with the early voting.

this doesn't sound good for the "serial whiner without a plan", or whatever zinger bush splattered him with this afternoon.

120 posted on 10/26/2004 4:42:39 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson