Posted on 10/25/2004 3:59:18 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
(AP) Several hundred tons of conventional explosives are missing from a former Iraqi military facility that once played a key role in Saddam Hussein's efforts to build a nuclear bomb, the U.N. nuclear agency confirmed Monday.
International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei will report the materials' disappearance to the U.N. Security Council later Monday, spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told The Associated Press.
"On Oct. 10, the IAEA received a declaration from the Iraqi Ministry of Science and Technology informing us that approximately 350 tons of high explosive material had gone missing," Fleming said.
In Washington, Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry's campaign said the Bush administration "must answer for what may be the most grave and catastrophic mistake in a tragic series of blunders in Iraq."
"How did they fail to secure ... tons of known, deadly explosives despite clear warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency to do so?" senior Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart said in a statement.
The Iraqis told the nuclear agency the materials had been stolen and looted because of a lack of security at governmental installations, Fleming said.
"We do not know what happened to the explosives or when they were looted," she told AP.
Nearly 380 tons of powerful explosives that could be used to build large conventional bombs are missing from the former Al Qaqaa military installation, The New York Times reported Monday.
The explosives included HMX and RDX, which can be used to demolish buildings but also produce warheads for missiles and detonate nuclear weaponry, the newspaper said. It said they disappeared after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq last year.
Bush's national security adviser, Condoleeza Rice, was informed of the missing explosives in the past month, the report said. It said Iraq's interim government recently warned the United States and U.N. nuclear inspectors that the explosives had vanished.
"Upon receiving the declaration on Oct. 10, we first took measures to authenticate it," Fleming said. "Then on Oct. 15, we informed the multinational forces through the U.S. government with the request for it to take any appropriate action in cooperation with Iraq's interim government."
"Mr. ElBaradei wanted to give them some time to recover the explosives before reporting this loss to the Security Council, but since it's now out, ElBaradei plans to inform the Security Council today" in a letter to the council president, she said.
There was no immediate explanation for the discrepancy between the IAEA's figure of 350 tons and the newspaper's estimate of nearly 380 tons.
Before the war, inspectors with the Vienna-based IAEA had kept tabs on the so-called "dual use" explosives because they could have been used to detonate a nuclear weapon.
IAEA inspectors pulled out of Iraq just before the 2003 invasion and have not yet been able to return despite ElBaradei's repeated urging that the experts be allowed back in to finish their work.
ElBaradei told the U.N. Security Council before the war that Iraq's nuclear program was in disarray and that there was no evidence to suggest it had revived efforts to build atomic weaponry.
Al Qaqaa, a sprawling former military installation about 30 miles south of Baghdad, was placed under U.S. military control but repeatedly has been looted, raising troubling questions about whether the missing explosives have fallen into the hands of insurgents battling coalition forces.
Saddam was known to have used the site to make conventional warheads, and IAEA inspectors dismantled parts of his nuclear program there before the 1991 Gulf War. The experts also oversaw the destruction of Iraq's chemical and biological weapons.
The nuclear agency pulled out of Iraq in 1998, and by the time it returned in 2002, it confirmed that 35 tons of HMX that had been placed under IAEA seal were missing. HMX and RDX are the key components in plastic explosives, which insurgents have widely used in a series of bloody car bombings in Iraq.
"These explosives can be used to blow up airplanes, level buildings, attack our troops and detonate nuclear weapons," Lockhart said.
"The Bush administration knew where this stockpile was, but took no action to secure the site. They were urgently and specifically informed that terrorists could be helping themselves to the most dangerous explosives bonanza in history, but nothing was done to prevent it from happening," he said.
"This material was monitored and controlled by U.N. inspectors before the invasion of Iraq. Thanks to the stunning incompetence of the Bush administration, we now have no idea where it is," Lockart said. He demanded the White House explain "why they failed to safeguard these explosives and keep them out of the hands of our enemies."
ElBaradei told the United Nations in February 2003 that Iraq had declared that "HMX previously under IAEA seal had been transferred for use in the production of industrial explosives, primarily to cement plants as a booster for explosives used in quarrying."
"However, given the nature of the use of high explosives, it may well be that the IAEA will be unable to reach a final conclusion on the end use of this material," ElBaradei warned at the time.
"A large quantity of these explosives were under IAEA seal because they do have a nuclear application," Fleming said Monday.
The nuclear agency has no concrete evidence to suggest the seals were broken, Fleming said, but a diplomat familiar with the agency's work in Iraq said the seals must have been broken if the explosives were stolen.
Interesting that Joe Lockhart is the primary "news" source quoted by the AP......
Democrats setting up their "see I told you so!".
____________________________________
SO, COULDN'T SADDAM HAVE ROUNDED IT UP AND SENT IT TO SYRIA BEFORE THE US GOT THERE?
I don't see the IAEA 'holding the fort' until the last second, and moving 3/4 of a million pounds of explosives isn't going to be done in a lone truck. It would require some logistics-- isn't it more likely that the Regime got the stuff out before the US could come in and find it?
This reminds me a lot of the so-called looting of that Baghdad museum.
_____________________________
Yes it is, but unless somebody steps forward out of Russia, China, France, Germany, or Syria we may never know the answer to that question.
"Weapons of "semi" mass destruction" [WSMD] have gone missing.
Did they disappear soon after the invasion began... After Chirac told Saddam he was sorry he couldn't stop the US, but before the US got control of the country?
If I remember correctly. This is a year old story. Unearthed and given Artificial Respiration by the Democrats. In the hopes of giving it "legs" and "traction".
Problem is. It's an Inventory Glitch. Not a Heist.
Those explosives were missing before any GIs set foot in Iraq.
I give it a 1.... Maybe a 1.5 on the Political Rechtor Scale.
Jack.
There is a long thread on this that has sunk off to page two. It was started last night at 10:21 EDT. Well over 200 posts.
Look over on the right bar and you'll see it.
War is messy, second-guessing is easy.
Lockharts new "vote for sKerry/Leftwards" ad campaign is revealed (I prefer reviled, but the dems don't care what I think....I'm just a peasant in their fiefdom.)
You think it's possible the blame falls at the feet of the UN? Afterall they were inventorying the stuff over there before we set foot in the sand.
The asshats in the Democratic party have been second guessing since Bush set foot in the Oval Office.
File this under, "things that make Americans' collective eyes roll".
The problem with coming out with anything regarding war one week before a campaign only screams politicizing "October Surprise", so unless this gets any traction, I guess we won't be having an intelligent debate on the lies of the Left and WMDs.
I wish this would have come out after the first debate, but then again, Kerry doesn't want Americans to know this truth.
Exactly. I asked on a previous thread if there was anything to show that the explosives were there immediately after the invasion.
That will be the main Demo theme until next Tuesday.
Hi, BigSky:
Just how hard or cheap would it be to bribe Hans Blix????
To look the other way as convoys of equipment and material traveled into The Bekkaa Valley?
He's obviously has lots of practice at it.
Jack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.