GEORGE SOROS: KERRY-DEMOCRAT PUPPETMASTER

IntellectualConservative.com ^ | 26 January 2004 | A.M. Siriano, Mia T

[Mia T]

 

GEORGE SOROS:
KERRY-DEMOCRAT PUPPETMASTER

We are the only site on the web devoted exclusively to intellectual conservatism. We find the most intriguing information and bring it together on one page for you. Home Articles Headlines Links we recommend Feedback Link to us Free email update About us What's New & Interesting Mailing Lists Intellectual Icons Submissions		The Dark Lord Soros by A.M. Siriano 26 January 2004 What is embodied George Soros is the morphed spirit of the philosopher Karl Popper, who fostered and defined a politico-economic theory called Open Society.
		Billionaire and ideologue George Soros, who came out of disembodied obscurity to popular recognition by vowing to unseat President Bush, is the sort of evil whose very presence should turn our stomachs.  As in the Lord of the Rings, in which Sauron begins to manifest himself as his power is threatened, Soros has come out of hiding in order to amass his armies to stop the spread of capitalism. Okay, so Im engaging in a little hyperbole.  But I believe the analogy, with America as a type of Middle Earth, is fitting.  Soros has been around for some time and has never been, or hosted, a disembodied spiritas far as I know!  What is embodied in him is the morphed spirit of the philosopher Karl Popper, who fostered and defined a politico-economic theory called "Open Society."  Soros has been in the process of redefining that theory and believes his version to be as close to truth as one can get. Soros adaptation of Open Society is easily recognized if one utters the words from which individualistic-minded people everywhere tend to recoil:  One-World Government.  You're not likely to hear that coming out of his sorry mouth; instead you'll hear this:  "It is easier to identify the enemies of the open society than to give the concept a positive meaning."  In a frightening piece from a February 1997 issue of The Atlantic Monthly, Soros spins his vision as best as he is able (and he is very able indeed--a moron does not a billionaire make): We start with the recognition of our own fallibility, which extends not only to our mental constructs but also to our institutions. What is imperfect can be improved, by a process of trial and error. The open society not only allows this process but actually encourages it, by insisting on freedom of expression and protecting dissent. The open society offers a vista of limitless progress. In this respect it has an affinity with the scientific method. But science has at its disposal objective criteria--namely the facts by which the process may be judged. Unfortunately, in human affairs the facts do not provide reliable criteria of truth, yet we need some generally agreed-upon standards by which the process of trial and error can be judged. All cultures and religions offer such standards; the open society cannot do without them. The innovation in an open society is that whereas most cultures and religions regard their own values as absolute, an open society, which is aware of many cultures and religions, must regard its own shared values as a matter of debate and choice.   "Open" here is cunningly used as a synonym for "free," but we are not talking about freedom at all.  Freedom of thought is a good thing, says Soros, as long as it is in the context of this worldwide system he is proposing, and freedom of religion is a lovely idea if religion remains an innocuous presence only.  By Soros' own words, it is easy to discover how secularism and world order are inseparable ideals.  Contrast this to the Founders' belief that freedom of thought can only exist in the context of liberty.  Freedom of religion is encouraged, not quelled, and is certainly not divorced from the process of self-governance.  The government cannot impel religious thought, of course, but it should never try to stop it either.   Soros further reveals the anti-theistic nature of his Open Society in another alarming paragraph: The Declaration of Independence may be taken as a pretty good approximation of the principles of an open society, but instead of claiming that those principles are self-evident, we ought to say that they are consistent with our fallibility. Could the recognition of our imperfect understanding serve to establish the open society as a desirable form of social organization? I believe it could, although there are formidable difficulties in the way. We must promote a belief in our own fallibility to the status that we normally confer on a belief in ultimate truth. But if ultimate truth is not attainable, how can we accept our fallibility as ultimate truth?   These may be the most audacious remarks I have ever read.  Some of the greatest words of liberty ever penned must now be revamped?  Read between the lines:  The Dark Lord Soros wants to throw God out of his proposed earthly paradise.  The core theme of the Declaration -- We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.   -- cannot stand within an Open Society, because it is inherently spiritual.  "Self-evident" means that something is obvious within the soul to any rational human being.  We are still trying to actuate the remarkable thoughts of our Founders, and have gone through tribulation to get as far as we have got, but now the forces of Mordor (call them MoveOn.orc if you like) are on the rise.  The message is that we must embrace relativism, the contradictory notion that "nothing is true" is the only truth.  In Soros' words:  "[T]hat our understanding is imperfect & we must accept & as an article of faith." Because I was a Cold War baby, raised in the Sixties and wary of the communist threat, I was happy and relieved to watch as President Reagan demolished the foundations of communism in the Eighties.  Since then, I have been perhaps too focused on the threat of its reemergence.  It is a very real threat, but I have neglected the stealthy rise of alternate paths to one-world government.  We must remember that utopian ideologies, which are all opposed to true individualism, are often at odds with each other.  Communism opposed Nazism during World War II, a fact that has fueled the false conclusion that one was far-left and the other far-right.  Both, in fact, arose from anti-theistic socialism, the core of leftist thought, and both were touted as paths to some type of utopian world order. George Soros, adopting the anti-totalitarian view of Karl Popper, fought against both communism and Nazism.  Now, with no competing insidious opponents left, he turns his attention to a more subtle and dogged enemy, capitalism: Although I have made a fortune in the financial markets, I now fear that the untrammeled intensification of laissez-faire capitalism and the spread of market values into all areas of life is endangering our open and democratic society. The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.   How convenient for him, to use capitalism for his own ends, and, once achieved, oppose similar opportunity for others!  But this is all very subversive.  Open Society is the latest version of the utopian dream, and this time it has a democratic face.  It is, in fact, the natural progression of the "progressive" party, which embraces democratic socialism, i.e., democracy within a socialistic framework.  This can only lead to global welfare and statist control, a system that is openly hostile to laissez-faire capitalism, to religious truth, and to any attempt to find freedom outside the boundaries of the state.  In such an environment, individualism is necessarily suspect; says Soros: I contend that an open society may also be threatened from the opposite direction--from excessive individualism. Too much competition and too little cooperation can cause intolerable inequities and instability.   Are we seeing signs of this push toward one-world government today?  How about the gospel-like assumption that we must not act to defend our land except under the aegis of the U.N.?  How about the cries of foul against our refusal to accept the juris-impudence of the International Court?  How about Kyoto as a doctrine?  How about the anarchistic protests against open global trade? George Soros views George Bush as the enemy, and there is some speculation that Soros is planning a financial coup to panic the market at election time.  This seems unlikely, but it all depends on how much hatred he has for Bush, a hatred that is largely a mystery to the tradition-loving people who live in Bush Country.  Conservatives everywhere disagree with Bush on many points, including the continued growth of the government, a trend in Congress that Bush has so far refused to curb, and his position on immigration, to name only two; but none of his weaknesses warrant the sort of hatred being spewed from the peaks of Mordor.  How can it be explained? It is very simple, really.  George Bush, by his present role and his uncompromising ideals, embodies the self-evident truths that people like Soros despise:  capitalism, religious freedom, and the belief that the truth can be realized and acted upon--all mainstays of individualistic liberty. The battle for Middle Earth is not yet upon us, folks, but let's not be fooled:  a storm is brewing. A. M. Siriano is a DBA/web developer by day and writes for his own website, amsiriano.com, by night. Email A.M. Siriano Send this Article to a Friend

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)

POURQUOI JOHN KERRY EST DANGEREUX POUR L'AMÉRIQUE

by Mia T, 6.04.04

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


NEW! compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com

NEW! unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.

Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.

To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

George Soros

eorge Soros could not have more clearly enunciated the lethal danger that he and John Kerry and the clintons and the rest of his leftist cabal pose for America.

Yesterday, at the "progressive," i.e., ultra-extremist left-wing liberal, "Take Back America" confab, Mr. Soros confirmed the obvious: 9/11 was dispositive for the Dems; that is, 9/11 accelerated what eight years of the clintons had set into motion, namely, the demise of a Democratic party that is increasingly irrelevant, unflinchingly corrupt, unwaveringly self-serving, chronically moribund and above all, lethally, seditiously dangerous.

"All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Apparently missing the irony, George Soros chastised America with these words even as he was trying his $25,000,000, 527-end-run damnedest to render himself "more equal than others" in order to foist his radical, paranoic, deadly dementia on an entire nation.

"Animal Farm" is George Orwell's satirical allegory of the Russian Revolution; but it could just as easily be the story of the Democratic Party of today, with the

Kennedy-Pelosi-Gore-clinton (either--"one for the price of two," I say) -Sulzberger-Soros-Moore construct

its porcine manifestation.

SOROS TSURIS

Soros' little speech reveals everything we need to know about the Left, to wit:

• its naivete about the War on Terror,

• its preference for demagoguery over rational argument, and ideology and reacquisition of power over national security,

• its mindset, which is inextricably bound to its failed, tortuous, reckless schemes, relics of a different time, a different war and a different enemy.

Soros is correct when he states that each of the two pillars of the Bush Doctine--the United States maintenance of absolute military superiority and the United States right of preemptive action--are "valid propositions" [in a post-9/11 world].

But when he proceeds from there to argue that the validity of each of these two [essential] pillars is somehow nullified by the resultant unequalled power that these two pillars, when taken together, vest in the United States, rational thought and national-security primacy give way to dogmatic Leftist neo-neoliberal ideology.

 

What is, in fact, "inviolate" here is the neo-neoliberal doctrine of U.S. sovereignty, which states simply that there must be none, that we must yield our sovereignty to the United Nations. Because this Leftist tenet is inviolate, and because it is the antithesis of the concept of U.S. sovereignty enunciated by the Bush Doctrine and the concept of U.S. sovereignty required by the War on Terror, rabid Leftists like Soros conclude that we must trash the latter two inconvenient concepts--even if critical to the survival of our country.

It is precisely here where Soros and the Left fail utterly to understand the War on Terror. They cannot see beyond their own ideology and lust for power. They have become a danger to this country no less lethal than the terrorists they aid and abet.

 

I think this administration has the right strategic vision and has taken many of the steps needed to get that long-term strategy rolling.

Where I give them the failing grade is in explaining that vision to the American public and the world. Key example: this White House enshrines preemptive war in the latest National Security Strategy and that scares the hell out of a lot of Americans, not to mention our allies. Why? This administration fails to distinguish sufficiently under what conditions that strategy makes reasonable sense.

My point is this: when you are explicit about the world being divided into globalization's Core and Gap, you can distinguish between the different security rule sets at work in each.

Nothing has changed about strategic deterrence or the concept of mutual-assured destruction (or MAD) within the Core, so fears about preemptive wars triggering World War III are misplaced.

When this administration talks about preemption, they're talking strictly about the Gap - not the Core. The strategic stability that defines the Core is not altered one whit by this new strategy, because preemption is all about striking first against actors or states you believe - quite reasonably - are undeterrable in the normal sense.

Thomas P.M. Barnett
The Pentagon's New Map
NB: Dr. Barnett is a lifelong DEMOCRAT

I'm a single-issue voter, as I guess must have become apparent.

I'm not a Republican. I'm not a conservative. I'm not a very great admirer of the president in many ways, but I think that my condition is... that this is an administration that wakes up every morning wondering how to make life hard for the forces of Jihad and how to make as hard as possible an unapologetic defense of civilization against this kind of barbarism... and though the Bush administration has been rife with disappointment on this and incompetent, I nonetheless feel that they have some sense of that spirit.

I don't get that... I don't get that feeling from anyone who even sought the Democratic nomination.

I would [therefore] have to vote for the reelection of President Bush.

Christopher Hitchens
Washington Journal, 6.01.04
C-SPAN

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004

 

MORE

 

election update!
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT~THE SERIES

NUISANCE' NUANCE: KERRY'S TERROR PROBLEM

SEVERAL SIMPLE ENDGAME SUGGESTIONS FOR PRESIDENT BUSH

DEBATE 3: JOHN KERRY OUTS JOHN KERRY
"THIS IS NOT A GOOD MAN"

YOU CAN TAKE THE BOY OUT OF AMBULANCE-CHASING
BUT YOU CAN'T TAKE AMBULANCE-CHASING OUT OF THE BOY

RAISING TAXES, YOU POOR SLOBS + TERESA'S 11.5% TAX RATE
(LAISSEZ-LES MANGER LE GÂTEAU)

THE LETHAL DANGER OF JOHN KERRY:
SPACE-TIME, TESSELLATIONS OF THE PLANET + TERRORISM
Kerry aims for 9/10, the good old days when terrorists were a "NUISANCE" and "not the focus of our lives"

Shadow War: The Untold Story of How Bush is Winning the War on Terror

DEBATE 2: Bush KOs Kerry
(The Lethal Danger of Kerry-Edwards + Old Media)

DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"

WHICH DANGEROUS MAN?

YOO-HOO! SECURITY MOMS:
THE TERRORISTS ARE TARGETING YOUR KIDS!

DEBATE ONE
NO GYP SHEET

Est-ce que je peux?
préemption et l'essai global

KERRY'S "GLOBAL TEST" FOR PREEMPTION:
WHY SECURITY MOMS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH

Diane Sawyer Nails Kerry Peril
PREEMPTION + KERRY'S EX POST FACTO REASONING

WINDSURFER WATERLOO
why the surfboard--not the snowboard--is (to mix war metaphors) Kerry's Achilles' heel

Windsurfing in the Persian Gulf

John "One Position on Iraq" Kerry's 1971 Replay

YOO-HOO DAN RATHER!
KERRY'S BELATED "HONORABLE" DISCHARGE:
Is a less-than-honorable discharge and clinton "pardon" behind Kerry's refusal to sign form 180 to release ALL of his records?

RATHERGATE IS ANOTHER WATERGATE: The Nexus

CARL BERNSTEIN: RATHERGATE MAY BE ANOTHER WATERGATE

CLUELESS: O'REILLY AND PODHORETZ ON RATHERGATE

THE KERRY-RATHER-BARNES FORGERIES DECONSTRUCTED

HEAR THE FIRST VEEP DEBATE NOW! (the whole ball of wax)
CHENEY WARNS AMERICA: THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT OUR SURVIVAL
KERRY-EDWARDS TRIES TO SHUT DOWN DEBATE

KERRY'S VIETNAM FIXATION
PART 1: advice from bill

Kerry's new W offensive

YOO-HOO! UNDECIDEDS + "PERSUADABLES"
HEAR THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY DOESN'T WANT YOU TO HEAR
(WHY INFORMED, RATIONAL DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH)

DECONSTRUCTING ZELL MILLER

EXPLOITING MAX CLELAND

Kerry is UNFIT #21: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
BOARDHEAD TO THE RESCUE

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)

Kerry is UNFIT #20: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
PREEMPTION-(the whole ball of wax)

CONTEMPLATING KERRY'S "GUT"

A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT
...BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?

getting kerry's goat
john kerry lacks presidential temperament

Two Psychologists on Kerry: Dangerous on National Security

YOO-HOO! followthemoney.org. . .
OVER HERE!

"bombastic ass" is not the antidote to "boorish ass"
(or why Keith Olbermann Cannot Do Cleanup for Chris Matthews)

UNFIT #19:
JOHN KERRY'S "MORE SENSITIVE WAR ON TERROR"

THE COMPLEAT JOHN KERRY
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

Kerry, NOT Bush, paralyzed by 9/11 attacks
Hear Kerry admit he could not think

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES ³
UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES ₂
KERRY-DEMOCRAT CONTEMPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY[annotated]

THE DEMOCRATS-ARE-GONNA-GET-US-KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES₁

dox in sox on lummox in box on fox

THE REAL "REAL DEAL"
(what Kerry's commanders and crewmates REALLY think of him--with transcripts)

Did John Kerry pick a running mate or hire a lawyer when he selected John Edwards?

THE MAN FROM HOPE: been there, done that

"Hope is on the way!" (the scoop)

THE TERRORISTS' USEFUL IDIOTS
all the usual suspects

A Vote for Kerry is a Vote for the Terrorists

ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES: 8/10/04 UPDATE!
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief

UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO

UNFIT #6: The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#1-making the tough choices in a post-9/11 world
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#2-understanding the job description

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#3-sang-froid and the "nuclear" button

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#4 - Kerry champions tolerance for terrorists

sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation

"Loose Cannon" Kerry's AWOL/PURPLE-HEART FRAUD

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic

USEFUL IDIOTS

MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE

The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL

JOHN KERRY'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans

bill clinton, boy "genius," unwittingly bares all on BBC

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

vetting missus clinton...

The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick

nepotism + tokenism = a nancy pelosi
(or a hillary clinton)

Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process
Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?

DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EARS (The Perjurer Returns)
(Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull')

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance

What is the REAL Reason for Gorelick's Wall?

giant sucking sound
KERRY MAKES DUKAKIS LOOK CONSERVATIVE, SMART + JUDICIOUS

Q ERTY6 ^{utter failure}_BUMP

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

 

MORE

 

[SunnySide]

"Not sure about the other son, though."

I read that this other son is the one who works with MoveOn.org(?)

[Mia T]

What interesting work!


Occidental and AlGore:

The more things change...

 

The Zeitgeist

by Mia T, 10-14-2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the more things remain the same....

   

[texasbluebell]

No, I didn't come across anything that made reference to that, Cal.

[texasbluebell]

A good example is Dr Armand Hammer, Lenin's personal friend, KGB agent and bag-man in the USA, founder of the Occidental Petroleum and the Gore family sponsor. Both he and his son were staunch communists,

It's amazing to me that not only are the Gores linked to Hammer this way, he was a financial supporter of Gore, Sr. and the Gores depended on him for help. "Throughout the whole of his life, Al Gore Sr. and his family depended on pay-outs, kickbacks and subventions from Hammer," according to an article at WorldNetDaily.

But Al Gore's daughter married a Schiff, one of the descendants of Jacob Schiff, who was a major contributor to the Russian Revolution, to the tune of about $20 million, a considerable sum even today, but in 1918 it was a staggering amount.

Gore's family are connected right and left to the communists. Amazing. Was Gore a Manchurian Candidate? Nothing would surprise me any more.

[MHGinTN]

You are a wonder, Mia! What a compilation of resources ... thank you so much for your untiring efforts.

[texasbluebell]

This link (link below) told me more than I could have imagined about Soros. To think that this Machiavellian multi-billionaire who sticks his nose into many countries' govts, is so determined to defeat George Bush, that nothing will stop him -- this is enough to give me nightmares.

Mia, you're right, this man is a puppet-master, and Kerry will dance to his tune, I'm afraid.

This particular group, which is mentioned in this article, called ACT (America Coming Together) is working like mad in battleground states like Ohio and PA, canvassing neighborhoods, keeping an eye on voters, making sure to contact the same ones over and over, leading people by the hand figuratively, to get them registered and ready to vote.

I'm more worried than I've ever been about the forces behind the scenes.


~~~~~~~~~~~~
Just a few paragraphs from this very long article, wanted to get these saved here.

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6_gNy-g41LgJ:quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news%3Fpid%3Dnifea%26%26sid%3DaVPlVg8vm8wg+ACT+Ickes+Soros&hl=en


Soros says he has vowed to do everything in his power to prevent Bush from winning re-election -- ...

In July 2003, Soros kick-started a network of nonprofit political organizations with an $18.5 million contribution. ``George was violent on this before a Democratic candidate was even chosen,'' says Byron Wien, senior investment strategist at Morgan Stanley and a close friend of Soros's. ``It was anybody but Bush.''

........................

Last year, his New York-based philanthropic organization, the Open Society Institute, backed groups calling for fair elections in the Republic of Georgia. Their work led to the ouster of President Eduard Shevardnadze, who'd been tainted by corruption scandals.

In 2003, Open Society and its affiliated foundations spent $429 million on pro-democracy projects and social programs in 60 countries.

.........................

``He is a great believer in changing countries,'' says Edward Luttwak, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic & International Studies.

.........................................

``We have eliminated one of the most vicious dictators of the past century and a continuing threat to the U.S.,'' says Perle, now a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington-based policy research group. ``I don't think George Soros brings any particular insight to the issue, and I think there is something wrong with one individual who has developed a hatred for the president and is spending millions to defeat him.''

........................

In Soros, the Democrats found an unusual benefactor -- one of the world's richest men, who is proud to call himself a ``limousine liberal.''

.................................

Soros has long sought political influence. Ever since he was a student at the London School of Economics in 1949, he envisioned making an impact on world affairs.

``I have always harbored an exaggerated view of my self- importance,'' he wrote in his book ``The Alchemy of Finance: Reading the Mind of the Market'' (Simon & Schuster, 1987). ``To put it bluntly, I fancied myself as some kind of god or an economic reformer like Keynes, or, even better, like Einstein.''

....................................

Then Bush announced his doctrine of pre-emptive military intervention. Soros says he was so repulsed by the policy that he started waking up at 3 a.m. and writing a critique, ``The Bubble of American Supremacy: Correcting the Misuse of American Power'' (PublicAffairs, 2003).

.........................

``President Bush equates freedom with American values,'' Soros writes. ``He has a simplistic view of what is right and what is wrong: We are right, and they are wrong. This is in contradiction with the principles of an open society, which recognize that we may be wrong.''

....................................

Soros decided to go after Bush in the spring of 2003. The billionaire hired two political consultants -- Mark Steitz, principal of TSD Communications Inc., a Washington-based consulting firm, and Tom Novick, a former state representative in Oregon and now a Democratic political consultant who specializes in statewide races -- to put together a research paper recommending what action he should take.

................................

In July 2003, Steitz and Novick made their own presentation to Soros at the billionaire's seaside mansion in Southampton on the eastern end of Long Island, New York.

Soros treated the meeting like a summit conference, hosting Steve Rosenthal, who was political director of the AFL-CIO, a federation of unions representing 13 million workers, from 1996 to 2002; Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, the environmental advocacy organization; and Ellen Malcolm, founder and president of Emily's List, a political action committee that supports Democratic women candidates and abortion rights.

[Calpernia]

I unfortunately only saw the references in message board postings. Not in legit sources :(

[Calpernia]

SunnySide,

WHERE did you read that? Any help? It would BE appreciated!

[Mia T]

ACT (America Coming Together) is, I believe, the Ickes group.
The Soros-Kerry operation is focusing on the battleground states.

These people are utterly corrupt. Vote fraud is rampant. The Justice Dept should start making some high profile arrests. Now.

[texasbluebell]

Yes, ACT is the Ickes group.

I once knew someone who knew the father of this Ickes, the father who worked in the Roosevelt administration.

Apparently unpleasant personality was inherited by the son from his father, from what this acquaintance said.

[texasbluebell]

I guess this would be a clue to the personality of the senior Ickes: His memoirs were titled "Autobiography of a Curmudgeon".

[nw_arizona_granny]

Page 2 of: soros education United States Connection


Web
Results 11 - 20 of about 6,340 for soros education United States Connection. (0.43 seconds)


F&P Funding and Exchange Programs
... Soros Foundation, Soros Foundation Visits by ... Information Agency,
International
Educational and Cultural ... States-Japan Foundation, United States-Japan
Foundation ...
www.friends-partners.org/friends/NaukaNet/
funding/programs/broad.html(opt,mozilla,unix,english,,MirAquaL) - 29k -
Cached - Similar pages

Educational Advising Center / Home / Scholarships / US government
...
... program and spend approximately three weeks in the United States. The
Community
Connection program is funded entirely by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural ...

www.eac.md/scholarships/us_govt/cc/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

Soros and Khodorkovsky - PittsburghLIVE.com
... more than $1 billion on charitable and educational projects in ... I am doing the
same
in the United States.". By this remark, George Soros was reminding us that he ...
www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/ opinion/datelinedc/s_165315.html - 23k -
Cached - Similar pages

George Soros, Postmodern Villain
... I am doing the same in the United States," said Soros ... Budapest last summer,
at which
Soros inaugurated a ... obligatory and free preschool education in desegregated ...
educate-yourself.org/cn/ georgesorospostmodernvillian31aug04.shtml - 46k -
Cached - Similar pages

Soros adds to doubts on Bush business deals - smh.com.au
... in political focus, with the billionaire United States investor George ... t know
him,"
Corn quoted Mr Soros as saying ... was supposed to bring in the Gulf connection. ...
www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/19/1026898920079.html - 22k -
Cached - Similar pages

Insight on the News: Soros Resolves to Bring Bush Down; Left-wing
...
... before Ronald Reagan led the United States to victory in ... A
multiplier for Soros and his allies, frustrated ...
www.findarticles.com/p/articles/ mi_m1571/is_2003_Dec_8/ai_111023083 - 27k -
Cached - Similar pages

Soros Funds The Genocide of White People Everywhere
... and problems of white poverty in the United States. ... of access to high-quality
education
in a ... Original Source Location: http://www.soros.org/individual_fellows ...
www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/temp/
TerrorTimeline/2002_SorosFundsHatredofWhites.htm - 39k - Cached - Similar pages

CentralAsia-L Archive - Fellowships and Grants - Page 8
... samal.kz URL: http://www.soros.org (network ... you are thinking about in
connection
with the ... OPPORTUNITY- US-NIS Partners in Education United States-NIS
Partners ...
casww.iatp.az/casww/calarc/calarc_grant08.html - 43k - Cached - Similar pages

Soros Resolves to Bring Bush Down - Insight on the News - National
... about Iraq's weaponry and about its connection to terrorist ... dollar campaigns to
legalize
drugs in the United States follows his logic, in Soros' own words ...
www.insightmag.com/news/2003/12/09/
National/Soros.Resolves.To.Bring.Bush.Down-565842.shtml - 45k -
Cached - Similar pages

December 2003 eDebate Archives: [eDebate] clark/soros connection
... can have access, for instance, to education.” unquote. ... US AID of the United
States
Department of State ... the foundation of the Clark-Soros connection with joint ...
www.ndtceda.com/archives/200312/0453.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

[texasbluebell]

Here's a link to something about one of the sons and moveon.org:

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:yZBh2P31ruwJ:www.celiberal.com/linkcache/3a/338.html+soros+son+moveon.org&hl=en

[texasbluebell]

"Jonathan Soros, son of philanthropist George Soros, is one of MoveOn's big donors so far, with a $5,000 contribution."

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:Bo5jkldMoaQJ:www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,130682,00.html+soros+son+moveon.org&hl=en

[texasbluebell]

It's neverending, isn't it? The attacks on this country.

[nw_arizona_granny]

I fear that soros is our enemy within, he has destroyed far
more than we can even guess at, take a look at this 1997 report, it could be today.

I found an article recently, that said many reporters were paid to NOT write.

This is G o o g l e's cache of http://www.islamicparty.com/commonsense/22leader.htm as retrieved on Aug 22, 2004 17:28:34
GMT.

To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:Yv1KWCCkl6YJ:www.islamicparty.com/commonsense/22leader.htm+fatwa+by+soros&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&client=googlet

Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted:
fatwa
soros













Text Only















A Word From The Leader - Issue 22,
Autumn 1997







As the prime minister of Malaysia, Dr. Mahathir
Mohamad, confronts George Soros at the
annual gathering of the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund, the leader of the
Islamic Party of Britain, David Musa Pidcock,
issued the following press release:

Unregulated Capital : The Other
Road To Serfdom

As a result of pointing out that George Soros the
king of the currency speculators has no clothes, the
Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad,
finds himself at the centre of an underhand,
orchestrated, media campaign designed to discredit
him. Providing further proof, if further proof were
needed, that John Swinton's admissions during his
retirement speech from the New York Times
(pre-Murdoch and Maxwell) were and still are
absolutely correct. When asked to respond to a
toast to an independent press he pondered and
then retorted: ”What folly is this toasting an
independent press. Everyone present here tonight
knows there is no such thing as an independent
press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of
you who would dare to write his honest opinions,
and if he did, you know before hand they would
never appear in print. I am paid $250 dollars a
week to keep my honest opinions out of the paper I
am connected with. Others of you are paid similar
salaries for similar work. The business of the
journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to
pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the foot of Mammon,
and sell himself, his country, and his race for his
daily bread: We are the tools and vassals of rich
men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks they
pull the strings, and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are the property of these
men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”

By entering this long running war 1694 to 1997 Dr.
Mahathir has at last managed to place on the
political agenda the three most important issues
facing the world community today and in so doing
finds common cause with a number of august
predecessors. Enlightened forerunners like David
Ricardo; Abraham Lincoln; John Ruskin and Lord
Acton, who were in no doubt where these problems
originate. Lord Acton, having determined that:
“power tends to corrupt, and absolute power
corrupt absolutely,” went on to state: “The issue
which has swept down the centuries and must be
fought sooner or later, is the people versus the
banks.” He was not calling for the abolition of
banks, nor are we, for if we did not have them we
would need to invent them. What is, however,
required is that banks are (a) `regulated and made
accountable' and (b) prevented from creating
money out of nothing on the back of M0 and then
issuing it as malevolent escalating debt rather than
benign credit, and that those, like Mr. Soros, “who
love to reap where they never sowed” be prevented
from speculating with the economies of nations
rather than on them.

One only needs to read Prime Minister William
Gladstons's accounts of his battles with Members of
Parliament from banks in the City and the Governor
of the Bank of England, to realise that a century
later the Prime Minister of Malaysia is just the latest
in a long line of honourable men destined to fall
victim to the destructive, duplicitous defence
mechanisms lodged in the print and electronic
media which are in place to deflect any meaningful
criticism and shift the blame elsewhere usually onto
their victims. Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, like
Mohammad Al Fayed and Earl Spencer can take
comfort in the fact that the Qur'an comprehensively
identifies the types of people who gravitate towards
this unscrupulous, soul destroying industry. Who
accuse honest people (in this case a Prophet) of
being “mad”. But it applies to all who speak the
truth, at most times in most places, for: “the truth
is a cause of severe discomfort to those paid to lie
for their living.”

Surah 68, appropriately entitled The Pen, describes
these corrupt writers, editors, and orators (past,
present and future) in the following terms:

“Nun, By the Pen and the record which men write
therewith, you are not, by the grace of your Lord,
mad or possessed. By no means. Verily for you is a
reward unfailing. And furthermore you stand on an
exalted standard of character. Soon will you see and
soon will they see which of you is afflicted with
madness. Verily it is your Lord who knows best,
which amongst men has strayed from His path: And
He knows best those who receive true guidance.
Therefore obey not rejecters (of truth), who would
have you compromise, in order that they, in turn,
may compromise (with a promise to influence world
opinion in your favour). Neither obey each feeble
oath-monger and detractor, broadcaster of slanders
and calumnies, who habitually hinder all that is
good (and decent), transgressing beyond bounds.
The malfactors deep in sin, who are violent and
cruel. The ones greedy and base born, therewithal
intrusive. Because he possesses wealth and sons.
When our signs are rehearsed to him he dismisses
them as “Ancient fables!” Soon will We brand the
beast on his snout.” 68:116.

In an article in The Guardian, dated Saturday
January the 18th 1997, George Soros, that well
known palindrome admitted that Dr. Mahathir
Mohamad is correct in his condemnation of laissez
faire (for which read less than fair) capitalism.
Soros stated: “Although I have made a fortune in
the financial markets, I now fear that the
untrammelled intensification of laissez faire
capitalism and the spread of market values into all
areas of life is endangering our open and
democratic society. The main enemy of the open
society, I believe, is no longer communism but the
capitalist threat.”

Selective amnesia is rampant amongs economists,
bankers and journalists. When Margaret Thatcher's
guru, Professor Hayek, singled out Marxist Socialism
as: “The Road To Serfdom” he “conveniently”
omitted to point out that this road was a dual
carriageway, and that the far greater threat was
from: “Unregulated Rentier Capitalism.” Hayek was
a palinodist. For on the one hand he calls for the
free play of “market forces” whilst arguing against
them on the other. In his chapter The Prospects of
International Order he states that: “ there is little
hope of international order or lasting peace so long
as every country is free to employ whatever
measures it thinks desirable in its own interests
however damaging they may be to others.”

Unfortunately, during their perpetual wars for
increased circulation caused by their masters
among the rentier capitalists i.e those who rent out
money at interest (not producer capitalists for even
Marx recognised that “the worker is also a
capitalist”) newspaper editors do not spend their
time trying to identify and rectify their own
problems let alone ours. What the Prime minister of
Malaysia has done is to remind us of Lord Acton's
confident assertion that our problems lie with the
present system of banking based on interest and
compound interest. Which will, hopefully, one day
soon lead to what John Maynard Keynes referred to
as: “The euthanasia of the Rentier.” We must,
however, concede one point to George Soros, who
makes a valid case when he asks the Prime Minister
to take a look at that part of the problem much
closer to home. Which will, undoubtedly, cause him
some difficulty if he grasps that particular nettle,
thus forcing him to run the gauntlet of disapproval
from most, perhaps all, the so called Islamic Banks
and bankers which operate throughout Malaysia.
Most, if not all these bankers draw their guidance
from their L.S.E. training and other Western
institutions. Muslim economists including some
leading Malaysian academics are now infected with
the insane notion that: “because the money
currently being traded electronically by them is only
`notional money', i.e., not `real cash' it is not
illegal or immoral to take a `commission' (their
euphemism for interest) on it.”

This is the thin end of the usurer's wedge, and
constitutes the ultimate threat to Islam and
political stability not only in Malaysia but elsewhere
including here in the United Kingdom. As it has
been noted on a number of occasions this confirms
the presence of an “Islamic Calvin” in our midst.
Calvin set loose the genie of global misery with his
fatwa which concluded that: “charging rent on
money, was only the same as charging rent for
land.” The rest, as they say, is history. However a
history written by the disciples of Calvin who, as a
result, have succeeded in achieving what the world
never saw before starvation in the midst of
abundance together with the ultimate impudence
Halal khanzir i.e: the Kosher Pork chop.

Author: David Musa Pidcock







The Party | The People | The Policies | Common Sense
E-Commerce | Qur'an Translation | Advanced Search | Contact Info
© Islamic Party 2000, Islamic Party of Britain, PO Box 844, Oldbrook, Milton Keynes, MK6 2YT

[Neophyte]

this man is a puppet-master, and Kerry will dance to his tune, I'm afraid.

But may be he won't? This is a unique situation when the ketchup money could be seen from the positive side: Kerry is already been bought by Theresa, so Soros will miss out...

On the other hand, who knows? May Kerry be a real slut... oops, I mean a real liberal? As such he wouldn't care about the number of punters or their sex ("gender"? - I'm never sure about this word's usage).

[SunnySide]

"We are jumping jacks they
pull the strings, and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are the property of these
men. We are intellectual prostitutes."


The above also describes liberal Hollywood and it's lacky celebrity minions(barking pelicans) perfectly.

[nw_arizona_granny]

Theresa and Soros are in the same class, with all the money.

They will rule the world.

Kerry will do as he is told.

[SunnySide]

"Theresa and Soros are in the same class, with all the money. They will rule the world." ----------------------------------------------------------- Sure if the apathetic and complacent continue to sit back and do nothing. Be vigilant, get involved. V's are for victories.