Posted on 10/11/2004 1:49:08 PM PDT by pabianice
It hasn't escaped the notice of many that in the past two weeks, the MSM has dropped five bombs on Kerry and fired upon him several other times. The latest two bombs are the NY Fishwrap's long interview with Kerry, in which he is quoted as labeling terrorism a "nuisance," and the just-posted copy of one of Kerry's off-shore, tax-avoiding, anti-American investments. Sniper fire continues, with one journal revealing that even MA voters give Kerry only half the support they gave Al Gore, "the first android candidate for president," to quote one writer.
Call me cynical, but do we detect a whif of Hillary's magic? How many other bombs will fall on Kerry and shots whiz past in the next several weeks? When will Kerry's original 1972 Navy discharge (probably "under other than honorable conditions") be fed to Drudge? When will Theresa's tax records suddenly appear on the Internet?
I truly believe that President Bush is going to win the election but I also believe that there is a very good possibility the Dims and radical left-wingers are going to steal it.
Nope. They are the one and the same.
I am expecting something very dramatic, much bigger than what you've cited (though they are not insignificant!). But you are right on track, and Hildabeast cannot permit a democRat to be sitting in the White House in 2008, that's for sure.
Either way, Hillary wins. If Kerry gets in there, we get Supreme Court Justice Clinton. If Kerry loses, we get RAT nominee Clinton in 2008. However, I think Hillary may be beginning to sense that the Democrat party may not survive until 2008 with 4 more years of Bush.
They are NOT one in the same, except perhaps ideologically. They are brothers.
Ahhh- your post did this ole granny's heart good.
I'll go to sleep tonight with visions of a Hilliary victory - this ONE time ;)
I wouldn't call it a strange new honesty. More like a " Kerry is a loser, let's distance ourselves from him move."
......
rats do leave a sinking ship
Et tu Brute?
........
Too good! LOL
Yup they all look the same to me.
No one should believe for one instant that the Clintons want Kerry to win. The Clintons control the Democratic Party, that part can't be denied. They control the purse strings and the party machinery. The Clintons crave only one thing and that is absolute power. What do they gain from a Kerry presidency? I know some have suggested that Hillary might be offered a Supreme Court appointment, but don't believe that for a moment. Hillary has a real shot at being the Democratic nominee for President, and she's not waiting in line behind Kerry and Edwards for that chance. Power, power, and more power is all Hillary and Bill want, and a Supreme Court offer isn't gonna cut it. Hillary wants to be the Democratic nominee for President in 2008, and we all know the Clintons usually get what they want. Kerry is toast.
I gotta give it to Hillary. Sabatoge Kerry now and sit patiently until 2008. All that time give W a chance to clean up the terrorist problems so she won't have to deal with it. By that time the economy will be pretty rosy, and her chances of victory will be increased. Now, I'm not saying she'll have a prayer against Gen. Franks in 2008, but her candidacy will be much less of a struggle than what's going on right now.
The question of most import is...If Kerry wins will he Arkancide before 2008?
I pray every day that President Bush is re-elected. However, there are two theories out there: One is that the Clintons are trying to kill any chance of Kerry winning, and the second one is all the voter fraud of the democrats. If the Clintons do not want Kerry to win, then how come all the voter fraud? This just doesn't make sense to me.
told you so...
You beat me to it. That is my question, too. I could see it if Hill were running her own campaign, separate from the Dems, but that is pie-in-the-sky. The Clintons are running the whole show. The only way I can think for the votor fraud to make sense with the Dem/Hill control is if the fraud was toward the Congress -- not the presidency.
So many new freepers telling us not to worry about Kerry appointing Hillary to the Supreme Court...
Some older Freepers saying the omnipotent all-powerful Clintons will prevent Kerry from winning.
It's amusing.
" Hillary Clintons friends long have said that if the former law-school professor could pick one job in Washington, it wouldnt be president; it would be Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court."
It's fortunate that Bush can beat Kerry despite the help Kerry's gettiing from the Clintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.