Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IT WON'T BE CLOSE ('a clear and decisive Kerry win is now the likeliest outcome') [barf alert]
Daily Dish ^ | 10/8/04 | Andrew Sullivan

Posted on 10/08/2004 1:31:25 PM PDT by Cableguy

Back in the early spring, I bet Michael Barone that Kerry would win this election. I'll buy him a drink if I'm wrong. And to be honest, I don't know who's more likely to win at this point. But here's a prediction I don't mind making. This election won't be close. Presidents seeking re-election very rarely win or lose a second time narrowly. Either they get trounced - Carter, Bush 41 - or they get re-elected handily - Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Clinton. People make a simple decision whether the guy's worth re-electing. Of course, the alternative makes a difference. My view is that most people don't want to re-elect Bush but are still unconvinced by Kerry. But they'll figure it out soon enough. Hence the big interest in the debates - and the huge swing since the first one. Joel Rosenberg of National Review looks at the Zogby data and worries:

There is some good news for the president. Zogby says "Kerry's edge on the economy is gone. Among those who cite the economy as the top issue, the candidates are in a dead heat — Bush holding a slight edge," (46 percent to 44 percent). And this: Bush "also leads among those who cite the War on Terror as the top issue" (68 percent to 26 percent)." But by far the most interesting — and disturbing — finding in his poll is that "among undecided voters, only 15% feel the President deserves to be re-elected, while 39% say it is time for someone new." What if the undecideds break 2-to-1 against the president less than 30 days from now? We could be looking at a Kerry landslide.

Yep. In fact, I'd say a clear and decisive Kerry win is now the likeliest outcome of this election. Bush's only hope is to tear Kerry apart. He can't defend his record. Every day, the news undermines it. He is losing this campaign in the final stretch. So he needs to attack. And when a Rove candidate needs to attack to survive, it's going to get ugly. Real, real ugly.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andrewsullivan; barebacker; carterdoesntexist; enemywithin; hahawewontheylost; pissypoofter; proterror; stdfactory; theenemywithin; traitor; unsafegaysex; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
We all know why Andy is rooting against Bush. GAY MARRIAGE. His analysis is not to be trusted. In fact, I stopped going to his site months ago. I only went there via a link to highlight his double-talk.
1 posted on 10/08/2004 1:31:26 PM PDT by Cableguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

The fix is in.


2 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Randy Andy Sullivan........CLICK


3 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:17 PM PDT by kingattax (FreeRepublic leads...others follow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

yep, bush, ahead in every poll (except the blatant dem polls) and leading in the electoral college, AND winning states al gore won last time, is going to lose in a blowout...maybe in the bizarro world!


4 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:22 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

I guess this guy's gerbil crawled up the pipe a little too far.


5 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:43 PM PDT by lormand (Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Correct. All of Andrew Sullivan's "analysis" is simply pro-Kerry spin -- all in the service of the most important issue possible -- making sure that nothing gets in the way of government promotion and celebration of homosexual activity.


6 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:51 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy
Another useless article.

Why is this nonsense posted?

7 posted on 10/08/2004 1:33:58 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Andrew Sullivan speaks with a foreign accent.


8 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:06 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

This election cannot be based on history of past elections. This is a whole different world in a whole different time. Sullivan is way off!


9 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:31 PM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

10 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:33 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Gay Andrew goes limp in 24 days.


11 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:51 PM PDT by demlosers (The FreeRepublic Pajama Press!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Sombody tell Andy its about 9/11 stupid.... terrorism is the trump card...


12 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:52 PM PDT by tomnbeverly (Global Tests in the defense of our Country are not supported by the CONSTITUTION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand

eeeewwww! LMAO! He's right though. And allow me to introduce myself. I am the queen of England.


13 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:53 PM PDT by Kylie_04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

The first time I've read Sullivan in ages...He got lost in the gay marriage swamp.


14 posted on 10/08/2004 1:34:57 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy
Amazing. Sullivan's now against the war because Bush won't let him marry his boyfriend. What a clod!

I know men are generally pigs, but gay men seem to think about nothing but their schlongs. The rest of us take time out for football--and defense of our country.

15 posted on 10/08/2004 1:35:30 PM PDT by Defiant (The question is, "are you better off now than if Al Gore had been elected in 2000?".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
The first time I've read Sullivan in ages...He got lost in the gay marriage swamp.

I think it's more of a 'bog.'

16 posted on 10/08/2004 1:35:57 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy
This election won't be close. Presidents seeking re-election very rarely win or lose a second time narrowly.


17 posted on 10/08/2004 1:36:06 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Visualize Smaller Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

bump


18 posted on 10/08/2004 1:36:09 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy
Oh, shut up Andrew. This guy was pro-Bush until the president supported the gay marriage amendment.
19 posted on 10/08/2004 1:36:09 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Barone's association with Sullivan makes me question Barone's judgment, which I usually find impeccable. With drinking buds like Andrew Sullivan, well.....that's a good reason to TRY to get drunk!


20 posted on 10/08/2004 1:36:17 PM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson