Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gwen Ifill, you did a good job, i'm sorry....

Posted on 10/06/2004 5:52:56 AM PDT by FesterUSMC

Dear Gwen Ifill:

I retract my statements posted on this site earlier before the debate, stating that your questions were going to be biased in favor of John Edwards. I feel you did a fine job as a moderator, and your questions were fair. Jim Lehrer could learn a few things from you, and he should take note. Thank you for being honest last night and doing your job.

CBS take note it's called a retraction, maybe you should try it sometime...


FesterUSMC


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: vpdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2004 5:52:56 AM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Agree 100%...she was much more fair then I expected. I appreciate her a little more now.


2 posted on 10/06/2004 5:55:12 AM PDT by 4everontheRight (W stands for Why don't you just sit down and shut the hell up John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

I agree, Fester. I was completely expecting Gwen to throw some soft balls to Edwards and save the tough questions for Cheney (and I think Edwards expected that too), but she had some really good questions for both of them. Isn't she with CBS? Maybe her affiliation with CBS made her realize that people will be watching the content of her questions very closely, in light of the forgery scandal.


3 posted on 10/06/2004 5:55:45 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

I agree....was negative about her at first, but she did a GREAT job.


4 posted on 10/06/2004 5:57:04 AM PDT by PilloryHillary (John Kerry is a traitor www.johnfkerrysucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

I agree. She did a decent job for someone with liberal/socialist leanings.

Maybe some of the negative feedback Lehrer got from the first debate filtered down to Ifill.


5 posted on 10/06/2004 5:57:10 AM PDT by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Agree. I thought she was extremely good. She actually asked Edwards some tough questions. Amazing. That is what threw off Edwards. He didn't expect to have to answer anything.


6 posted on 10/06/2004 5:57:24 AM PDT by Republican Red (A Global Freak'n Test ???????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
I was surprised as well. She seemed very even handed in comparison to Laeher.
7 posted on 10/06/2004 5:57:41 AM PDT by dis.kevin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dis.kevin

old hillary wouldn't want edwards to look good don't you think


8 posted on 10/06/2004 5:59:18 AM PDT by RSADGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

"Ditto"


9 posted on 10/06/2004 6:02:11 AM PDT by ChipShot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
Not so fast. Read the transcript. You might change your mind.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134579,00.html

10 posted on 10/06/2004 6:02:20 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Edwards did seem thrown off at times during the debate. My proudest moment came when Cheney didn't want to respond to the gay marriage issue after Edwards had his one minute rebuttal. I took that to mean that Cheney had said all that he wanted to say about that issue and that he wasn't going to use a personal story to further the campaign. He showed real decency and restraint and I was proud of him in that moment. Plus, it made Edwards look kinda bad for bringing up something so personal and obviously meaningful to Cheney. I would have felt the same way if Cheney had brought up Edwards' son.
11 posted on 10/06/2004 6:02:34 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

I agree. Ifill did an even-handed job.


12 posted on 10/06/2004 6:02:39 AM PDT by Marylander (The memory hole? It was down for a while, but it may be coming back online.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24
Isn't she with CBS?

MODERATOR GWEN IFILL, HOST OF PBS' "WASHINGTON WEEK"

Transcript of debate on FOXNEWS

13 posted on 10/06/2004 6:02:43 AM PDT by FesterUSMC (If you don't have the hammer your going to be the anvil, and I would rather be the hammer!FesterUSMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4everontheRight

I would agree with your assessment on her moderator skills. She threw tough questions at each candidate, rather than forcing one to defend his position the entire time.


14 posted on 10/06/2004 6:03:23 AM PDT by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Oh--PBS. My bad.


15 posted on 10/06/2004 6:03:39 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
Thanks for posting this thread. These comments about Gwen Ifill's professionalism last night, needed to be said.

GREAT job Ms. Ifill!

16 posted on 10/06/2004 6:04:13 AM PDT by NordP (We're Mad As Zell, and We're Not Going To Take Your Liberalism Anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Agreed.

She did a fine job and occasionally empathized with VP Cheney vis a vis Edwards behavior.


17 posted on 10/06/2004 6:04:14 AM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I agree that Gwen did a good job especially in comparison to Jim Lehrer's weak performance.

The moderator I am worried about is Bob Scheiffer in the final debate. I caught a portion of CBS news after the debate last night and he was bringing out the "pom pomS" and cheering Edward's performance while downgrading Cheney. Expect Scheiffer to lob softballs at Kerry all night long unfortunately.


18 posted on 10/06/2004 6:04:56 AM PDT by ClarenceThomasfan ( We want a Bush landslide in November!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar
She leaned a little towards Edwards and that is to be expected given she is a democrat, but she did keep the questions pretty fair and asked hard questions of BOTH sides unlike Jim Laherer
19 posted on 10/06/2004 6:05:15 AM PDT by FesterUSMC (If you don't have the hammer your going to be the anvil, and I would rather be the hammer!FesterUSMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

A couple of times Gwen's voice tone in asking Edwards questions seemed to indicate that Edwards/Kerry positions had her somewhat confused, and the question was asked for clarification---which didn't come forth easily.

Edwards spend much of the time defending Kerry positions and he seemed strained while doing it. It was sort of -- I have to defend the top of our ticket even though his position isn't mine.


20 posted on 10/06/2004 6:05:18 AM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson