Skip to comments.
Cops Hunt Man Suspected of Threatening President
WABC News ^
| 9/20/04
Posted on 09/20/2004 2:34:25 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana
(New York-WABC, September 20, 2004) Breaking news concerning President Bush's visit to New York. Eyewitness News is told that there has been a credible threat against the president Monday.
From the AP: The News in Photographs The Day's Top 25 Stories- NY, NJ, CT, US, Entertainment Your Hourly Forecast
Eyewitness News' political reporter Dave Evans says the first sign of something going on came when security around the president's visit got even tighter than usual.
He says authorities are looking for a 55-year-old man named Lawrence J. Ward in connection with the reported attempt on the president's life.
Ward is said to be driving a blue Toyota sedan with a New York license plate: BRF-6596.
Seventh Avenue is blocked off because of the incident.
We'll have the latest here as it's available and on Eyewitness News tonight.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 200409; assassination; assassinationplots; bush43; deaththreat; du; duh; jfkslastbesthope; larryward; lawrenceward; napalminthemorning; presidentbush; usss; ward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-149 next last
To: hispanarepublicana
61
posted on
09/20/2004 3:04:46 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
("let them go naked for a while"...Theraaazaaaaa Heinz-Kerry)
To: wallcrawlr; SheLion; PureSolace
Fine, then you all won't mind when some numbnuts on the other side posts everything about Buckhead, including his picture, on some alternative web site because it's available on his law firm's site? (I imagine that right now, his law firm is absolutely innundated with phone calls and faxes about him, the majority of which are probably not pleasant). Point is,
just because it's available on the net does not give one the right to post personal information in an open forum!. (And please, take that "it's open information" arguement and stick it where the sun don't shine - you know what I'm talking about).
So unless you believe that the Soviets had it right with the Komitet Bezpasnosti Gosvardnosti I suggest you rethink your urges.
62
posted on
09/20/2004 3:07:00 PM PDT
by
Archangelsk
(Plain, simple soldier. Nothing more, nothing less.)
To: Archangelsk
I don't know, but I definitely know that what you did is an invasion of privacy. Looking up a name in an on-line phone book is an invasion of privacy? Since when!
63
posted on
09/20/2004 3:07:55 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: cwb
When you have filmakers, authors, academia, celebrities and journalist (hi Dan) all partaking in this vitriolic hatred...all given wide exposure, it is only a matter of time before someone thinks they are doing right thing. It sticks with me that I heard a few months back that the DemocRATS will do ANYTHING to get the President out of office. I have just been holding on with lots of prayers for him.
64
posted on
09/20/2004 3:08:29 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: Archangelsk
Point is, just because it's available on the net does not give one the right to post personal information in an open forum!Nobody did that.
So there was no invasion of privacy.
To: Archangelsk
PMFJI, but having done extensive web research on other topics (genealogy, etc.), I think it's up to all of US to be personally responsible for what we do and do not post about ourselves.......I'm careful never to post my occupation, for instance.....when I have knowledge that I want to post but that would give away my identity, I freepmail it. My FR name is a treasured thing that only my husband knows.....
I hold no grudge against someone who knows my name and wants to look up my phone number or "Google" me. If I have a problem with that, I should unlist my number.
To: Archangelsk
(And please, take that "it's open information" arguement and stick it where the sun don't shine - you know what I'm talking about). Why did you direct this post to me? I'm not doing a search on anyone. And if I did, I surely wouldn't post it in here.
67
posted on
09/20/2004 3:11:11 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: hispanarepublicana
He is s psycho (appears paranoid schizophrenic) who represented self in divorce action
His appeal: "The marriage was terminated and all rights and property of the defendant were anschlused (appropriated) by the plaintiff on 4 January, 2000, by means of Nazi-style psychiatric arrest executed by Guilford, Connecticut police on the sole basis of request by the plaintiff. Ex parte judgment granted to the plaintiff on 2-8-00 ordered periodic transfer payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of a magnitude of 40% of the defendant's employment compensation. Criminal penalty was assigned for non-compliance with the order and the plaintiff was granted police enforcement of abrogation of the defendant's 4th Amendment right to security in home, person, paper and effects."
To: SheLion
Thank you for your sanity and clarity. Exactly what I was thinking. If it's in the white pages, it's public.
To: TheConservator
70
posted on
09/20/2004 3:20:00 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
To: Archangelsk
>>Fine, then you all won't mind when some numbnuts on the other side posts everything about Buckhead, including his picture, on some alternative web site because it's available on his law firm's site? (I imagine that right now, his law firm is absolutely innundated with phone calls and faxes about him, the majority of which are probably not pleasant). Point is, just because it's available on the net does not give one the right to post personal information in an open forum!. (And please, take that "it's open information" arguement and stick it where the sun don't shine - you know what I'm talking about).
Wow. Thanks. I didn't know any of this about Buckhead. Now the DUmmies won't have to use Nexis. One may want to practice what they preach.
71
posted on
09/20/2004 3:20:01 PM PDT
by
dmartin
To: Archangelsk
don't know, but I definitely know that what you did is an invasion of privacy. What are you blathering about?
It's public knowledge for crissake.
72
posted on
09/20/2004 3:21:29 PM PDT
by
bikepacker67
(Sandy wasn't stuffing his socks, he was stuffing A sock.)
To: hispanarepublicana; firebrand
>>>Could someone ping some NY FReepers?<<<<
73
posted on
09/20/2004 3:24:42 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Archangelsk
>>>but I definitely know that what you did is an invasion of privacy.
Why? They are not unlisted. They Net directories aren't register to sign in.
74
posted on
09/20/2004 3:27:03 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Archangelsk
So you are speaking of invasion of privacy in a moral, rather than a legal sense? Because Post 13 falls nowhere near the legal boundry for invasion of privacy.
75
posted on
09/20/2004 3:30:01 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: hispanarepublicana; Calpernia
I was sitting in Starbucks and saw a bomb-squad vehicle race by at 80 miles an hour. I said that was the bomb squad but nobody seemed to hear me. LOL. New York.
To: hispanarepublicana
Bitter divorce. It's been known to drive sane people crazy.
To: Rebelbase
SW SKELLUM <obscure movie reference> "You'll never figure it out." </obscure movie reference>
78
posted on
09/20/2004 3:42:04 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
To: Mo1
If all Freep remarks on #26 were like yours, I would have to get rid of my PC because there would not be anything good to read. LOL
To: Poohbah
I forgot the name of the bank!
80
posted on
09/20/2004 3:45:09 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
("let them go naked for a while"...Theraaazaaaaa Heinz-Kerry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson