Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC TO LAUNCH FRESH ATTACK ON BUSH GUARD DUTY:  WILL RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT 1978 CAMPAIGN LIT
The Drudge Report ^ | 9-12-04 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 09/12/2004 3:59:01 PM PDT by Crazieman

Edited on 09/12/2004 4:34:25 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]






XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN SEPT 12, 2004 19:02:38 ET XXXXX

DNC TO LAUNCH FRESH ATTACK ON BUSH GUARD DUTY:  WILL RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT 1978 CAMPAIGN LIT

**Exclusive**

Faster than a CBS eye can blink, dogged Dems are set to take to the airwaves anew hoping to keep questions about President Bush's National Guard duty in play, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

Candidate Kerry apparently has rejected former President Clinton's advice not to get further locked in a 2004 Vietnam quagmire.

"George W. Bush's campaign literature claimed that he 'served in the U.S. Air Force.' The only problem? He didn't,"  slams a new DNC press release set for distribution.

Dems will attempt to increase the heat on Bush ahead of his planned Tuesday address before The National Guard Association gathering in Las Vegas.

In 2000, Bush opened his National Guard Association speech: "General, I am reporting for duty."

MORE

Kerry plans to speak to the group on Thursday, but he personally hold back questioning Bush's service, sources explain.

The coordinated nationwide effort this week by the DNC has been code-named "Project Fortunate Son."

"George Bush has a clear pattern of lying about his military service," DNC Communications Director Jano Cabrera blasts in the new release. "From 1978 to the present day, George Bush has refused to tell voters the truth about his service. It's time for the President to come clean."

"Flyers distributed to Texas voters during Bush's failed Congressional race say 'he served in the U.S. Air Force and the Texas Air National Guard.' But according to Air Force officials, Air National Guardsmen are not counted as members of the active-duty Air Force."

MORE

-----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgereport.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2004
Not for reproduction without permission of the author


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deadhorse; democratsarescum; desperate; desperatedems; dnc; drudge; kerrystrategy; ltbush; memogate; napalminthemorning; pimpinghisradioshow; pointless; rathergate; sirenseverysunday; tang; whiteflag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-763 next last
To: TomGuy
What happened 35 years ago is mostly irrelevant, so Kerry needs to get past it---but he can't seem to.

It's not irrelevant to Kerry, which shows a character fault in himself.

Some speculate that his year long Rambeaux of Vietnam storyline is a reaction to what he always knew was going to come out...his over the top anti-war activities.

201 posted on 09/12/2004 4:32:02 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk

I think one thing that the American people instinctively recognize about all of this that the MSM and the Kerry Campaign, in their blind stupid rage, completely miss, is that Bush has NEVER bragged about his service. He doesn't bring it up. HE doesn't base his campaign on it. He doesn't wear it on his sleave. Therefore his sins, if there are any, are not held against him. But Kerry brings it up every friggin second so he is always susceptible to the questions. Any fifth grader could figure this out. Why is it so hard for Lurch, Shrum et al?


202 posted on 09/12/2004 4:32:12 PM PDT by MMkennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer

Spit balls!


203 posted on 09/12/2004 4:32:23 PM PDT by jim35 (Will the press still be anti-war when a democRAT is in office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Ok I went & checked it out on DU. How could this possibly even be their "smoking gun?" It is in no way relevant to this election. I's kinda pitiful when you think about it. To think that this is on the same level as commiting treason stateside is beyond all logic.


204 posted on 09/12/2004 4:32:39 PM PDT by AZamericonnie (51 more days.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

The last time I checked Air National Guard fell under the department of the Air force, back then it was air force and army but either way.

No where on that does Bush claim that he was active duty, although technically he was for two years.


205 posted on 09/12/2004 4:32:50 PM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Route66

"They have even scoured garage sales buying up old typewriters and are actively looking for someone who actually knows how to use them."

They haven't called me yet, my mother taught me to type in 1946 and made sure that I was reasonably good at it.

No chance of matching her since she typed 180 wpm on a manual typewriter.


206 posted on 09/12/2004 4:33:00 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

The issue Terry McAuliffe is pushing this time is that Bush said in a congressional race campaign flyer that he had served in the U.S. Air Force and the Texas Air National Guard and that Bush is lying about the Air Force.
In reality, Bush was active duty (24-7) for the first two years of his Guard career going to OCS and then flight training (all USAF schools). You don't learn how to fly a fighter plane at weekend drill. After 23 months he joined his active reserve unit.
The problem with this Guard issue is that last week--after careful coordination between the DNC and big media, CBS caused the whole train to wreck. This latest assualt is Part II of a political operation that is disintegrating. The right hand no longer knows what the left is doing.


207 posted on 09/12/2004 4:33:18 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow

Thanks for posting that....


208 posted on 09/12/2004 4:33:25 PM PDT by woofie (This document was generated in 2004 by a computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Kerry has chosen to fight his battles on the Viet Nam War, the only area where he thinks he has any advantage and he is losing it badly. He is being beaten on his only strong point. I like it that way.


209 posted on 09/12/2004 4:33:27 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

When a Reservist/National Guard type is activated for training, they are considered active duty. For purposes of "total number of people on active duty", the pentagon does NOT consider them on active duty (this is head count ONLY).

To prove this, have a troopie get in trouble while in training, and ask WHO is going to discipline them... Active Duty leadership or their home station chain of command? OBVIOUSLY, the folks that they're assigned to, during the period that they're assigned for.

In the case in question... Hmmm, 2 years in training sure smells like Active Duty to me.

IMHO, it should be another Kerry Campaign self-inflicted wound, if the MSM had a clue in any of their talking heads.

cheers...


210 posted on 09/12/2004 4:34:06 PM PDT by drachenfels ("Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
"They are toast and they know it."

It's actually worse than that the Clintonistas have moved in for the kill just to make sure f'ing goes absolutely no where.
211 posted on 09/12/2004 4:34:07 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
"Fresh on the heels of memogate, will memogate clean their clocks, or will they bury it in more false allegations?"

Dead on. They are banking on burying it with new charges so that the public ends up saying the whole issue is unintelligible with just one side saying this and the other saying that and there is no difference in the candidates when it comes to their past service. IMHO it might just work.
That's the bad news.
The good news is that on the prez.'s side, he is a known quantity as they say and this is certainly old political fodder. He also still enjoys a comfortable lead. This is absolutely not an issue that will propel John effing Kerry to the front. Also a plus is the fact that this helps let the "clock run out on the election" so to speak.
212 posted on 09/12/2004 4:34:26 PM PDT by SolomoninSouthDakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZamericonnie

Smoking Gun my pajama-clad butt. These fools at DU are picking that gun up, peering down the barrel, and passing it to the next shmuck in line. They're gonna blow up real good soon.


213 posted on 09/12/2004 4:34:48 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
They should have engineered Kerry's departure months ago and put Edwards at the top. Still, it might be working. You notice the "Time" interviewer didn't bother to ask Kerry the Cambodia question?

Eddie boy was too green plus no one will vote in a trial lawyer as president. Not his kind anyways. Never underguesstimate the power of the dinosaur media. We are still Lilliputians trying to tie down Gulliver. 

John Kerry is far from down and out of the race because talking points and propaganda do not carry elections by themselves. You have to be able to deliver them to "swing" voters, and the old mass media does a much better job than Rush Limbaugh, FoxNews and the internet. That's why millions are invested in TV advertising and nothing on internet advertising.

214 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:03 PM PDT by dennisw (Allah FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
GOOD GRIEF! THIS is what they are planning to attack? They are fools. Bush spent nearly two continuous years in the active duty USAF - in officer training and then in UPT (pilot training) before returning to his Guard unit. DU= maroons!
215 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:03 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: plushaye
LOL! Baaaaaaad karma!
216 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:15 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow

http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/Air%20National%20Guard

WordNet Dictionary
Noun 1. Air National Guard - a civilian reserve component of the United States Air Force that provides prompt mobilization during war and assistance during national emergencies
Synonyms: ANG


Wikipedia

United States Air National Guard Shield
Shield of the United States Air National GuardIn the US military, the Air National Guard (ANG) is a militia associated with the US Air Force (USAF). Each state, territory, and the District of Columbia has an Air National Guard. As Federally-organized militia, Air National Guard units are liable to activation by both the President of the United States and the governors of the several states.


217 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:20 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
It was a tragic accident that a teenager got into. Happens every day.

Exactly. And now we have proof that Democrats are liars when they say...


218 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:41 PM PDT by syriacus (Kerry lied, while honorable men died. Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: The Bandit
Don't tell me, they found more smoking documents in Kitty Kelley's book?

The only thing smoking in that book is the author.

219 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:46 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Does the word DESPERATION ring any bells?

This is pure nihilistic despair. They're ready to pull the chords on their explosive vests.

220 posted on 09/12/2004 4:35:46 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-763 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson