Skip to comments.
Okay, so I'm a selfish hedonist for supporting Alan Keyes for U.S. Senate
Vanity
| Sept 2, 2004
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 09/02/2004 1:57:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Okay, so I'm a Selfish Hedonist for supporting Alan Keyes for U.S. Senate
Nothing (well almost nothing) would please me more than seeing Alan Keyes win a seat in the U.S. Senate!
Why?
- He's a God-fearing man
- He's an unabashed conservative
- He defends America and traditional American values
- He would be a pro-life vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-family vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-gun vote in the Senate (he's one of the few who is unafraid to express and stand for the true meaning and intent of the second amendment)
- He is a true advocate of the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence
- He would be a pro-tax cut vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-defense vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-sovereignty vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-limited government vote in the Senate
- He would be a pro-self-government vote in the Senate
- He would be a Senate vote opposing liberal activist judges
- He would be a vote in the Senate for an eventual repeal of the 16th amendment
- He would be a vote in the Senate for an eventual repeal of the 17th amendment
- He's a far, far better man than his opponent on every issue near and dear to my heart
And despite his remarks on reparations or affirmative action, I would be extremely happy and take great pleasure in seeing Alan Keyes defeat Barack Obama. I believe whole heartedly that unlike Obama, Senator Keyes would preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America to the utmost of his ability and would dedicate himself to working with all of us in securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, and if that makes me a selfish hedonist, then so be it.
I challenge anyone here to put up a detailed list of the reasons why you believe Barack Obama would be better for America in the Senate than Alan Keyes.
TOPICS: US: Illinois; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: keyes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 501-516 next last
To: Jim Robinson
As of the time of this posting, no one has a full transcript of Alan Keyes' "selfish hedonist" remarks.
That alone makes me wonder about it being another Democrat smear.
21
posted on
09/02/2004 2:04:22 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: Jim Robinson
I challenge anyone here to put up a detailed list of the reasons why you believe Barack Obama would be better for America in the Senate than Alan Keyes. Obama is sane and not narcistic. Obama is also capable of growth and conversion. Keyes is a lost cause.
22
posted on
09/02/2004 2:04:23 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: PeterFinn
I've heard a rumor that Keyes is supporting slavery reparations: any truth to this or is it being taken out of context? For the most part, it's something taken out of context. I saw his statement as a way of challenging the "reparations" movement by changing the context from a give-away to encouraging work and private enterprise. It's doubtful that Keyes would actually make his proposal a legislative action in the Senate.
23
posted on
09/02/2004 2:04:49 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
(My handle is "kevkrom", and I approved this post.)
To: dubyaismypresident
Is that anything like a coven?Nah. More like a herd, shiver or litter.
Gang, Gaggle or brood.
24
posted on
09/02/2004 2:05:47 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Dave S
Obama is sane??? What makes you think that?
25
posted on
09/02/2004 2:06:02 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: Jim Robinson
26
posted on
09/02/2004 2:06:04 PM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: dubyaismypresident
Is that anything like a coven?Nah. More like a herd, shiver or litter.
Gang, Gaggle or brood.
27
posted on
09/02/2004 2:06:24 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: steplock
They are the Republicans who are the "useful idiots" of the left.
To: Jim Robinson
I've been scratching my head at the blistering criticism directed by some towards Keyes. This is a man who is not afraid to say what needs saying, a man who inspires the fear of God in even hostile audiences.
Thank you for all you do.
29
posted on
09/02/2004 2:07:04 PM PDT
by
Lexinom
To: Taliesan
Well maybe what we need is a few more "dumb politicians" who steadfastly believe in America and the Constitution and fewer slick politicians who will do and say anything to get elected.
To: Jim Robinson
He's a God-fearing man
Is it God-fearing or God-loving now?
31
posted on
09/02/2004 2:08:24 PM PDT
by
lelio
To: Jim Robinson
And everyone knows that you are a newbie.
To: Jim Robinson
ZOT!
Just kidding :)
Well said, Mr. Robinson. Chalk up another selfish hedonist to add to your ranks.
33
posted on
09/02/2004 2:10:04 PM PDT
by
Begin
(RIP RWR 1911-2004)
To: Jim Robinson
Can't argue with you Jim.
Too bad Keyes is an bumbling idiot when it comes to getting elected.
34
posted on
09/02/2004 2:10:09 PM PDT
by
zarf
To: Jim Robinson
You have to get elected first.
This may bother you.
It will never change.
35
posted on
09/02/2004 2:10:16 PM PDT
by
Taliesan
(fiction police)
To: Jim Robinson
I doubt Alan lost any Republican votes with that comment. He may have lost a few independent votes. I hope he wins, but I am doubtful he will.
36
posted on
09/02/2004 2:10:28 PM PDT
by
Feiny
(It's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it.)
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
And everyone knows that you are a newbie. "Jim Robinson; Since Nov 28, 1997"
The timing looks suspicious to me. ;)
37
posted on
09/02/2004 2:11:12 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
(My handle is "kevkrom", and I approved this post.)
To: Dave S
I think it would be a fair statement to say the Keyes is likewise not narcistic. As a matter of fact, no one is narcistic.
38
posted on
09/02/2004 2:11:28 PM PDT
by
yeswecan
To: Jim Robinson
To: kevkrom
For the most part, it's something taken out of context. I saw his statement as a way of challenging the "reparations" movement by changing the context from a give-away to encouraging work and private enterprise. It's doubtful that Keyes would actually make his proposal a legislative action in the Senate. He's for them, but not really. Uh-huh.
Correct answer: yes. He is for reparations.
40
posted on
09/02/2004 2:11:58 PM PDT
by
Taliesan
(fiction police)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 501-516 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson