Skip to comments.
Bait and Switch possible?
Posted on 09/01/2004 3:26:02 PM PDT by PlushieWithTeeth
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: PlushieWithTeeth
New Jersey and the Torch for example?
2
posted on
09/01/2004 3:27:27 PM PDT
by
Andyman
To: PlushieWithTeeth
There are no restrictions at all.
You vote to choose your state's electors. Then they are free to choose whoever they want.
3
posted on
09/01/2004 3:27:32 PM PDT
by
swilhelm73
(There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men. --Burke)
To: Andyman
Each state has their own rules.
4
posted on
09/01/2004 3:28:04 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
To: Andyman
What I mean is, what does the law matter to Dumbascraps?
5
posted on
09/01/2004 3:28:27 PM PDT
by
Andyman
To: So Cal Rocket
Each state has their own rules.
To choose how to get on the ballot - you don't have to be on the ballot to be elected.
6
posted on
09/01/2004 3:28:54 PM PDT
by
swilhelm73
(There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men. --Burke)
To: PlushieWithTeeth
If you are talking about demonRATS than there are no laws rules or common decency. Whatever it takes to win. The rightness of their cause overrides everything else. Welcome to FR!
7
posted on
09/01/2004 3:29:07 PM PDT
by
OSHA
(Cheap Shots, Low Blows and Late Hits. Free Delivery. Fast Friendly Service with a Smile!)
To: PlushieWithTeeth
I'm not an expert in Election Law - there are only a few and they're all in Washington. But, whatever the party rules are - I think the real complications may come from the states and their deadlines for getting on the ballot. But, you form an excellent question - one that the DNC "elders" have to be asking themselves right now.
To: PlushieWithTeeth
The democRATS have already PROVEN there are NO RULES...
...if the candidate is a (D)
However the rules are VERY STRICT if the candidate is an (R)
It does not matter to the (D)'s if absentee ballots have
already been mailed out to our military, and overseas voters.
They don't care... Courts back them up.
what's even worse, they try to claim a vote for (D1) who is
no longer on the ballot, is actually a vote vor (D2), the
substitutee (in other words, Shrillary)
To: PlushieWithTeeth
We'll know soon enough if Lautenberg suddenly shows up kissing small children and windsurfing up the Potomac.
To: swilhelm73
Yes... you are correct. Names on the ballot and who the Electors select can be two different things.
11
posted on
09/01/2004 3:30:52 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
To: PlushieWithTeeth
Hillary ain't gonna swoop in. Fuggheddabadit.
12
posted on
09/01/2004 3:30:59 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(Limousine Liberal--a man who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people have cake.)
To: swilhelm73
There are no restrictions at all. Well shoot. The Dems should have forgone the entire campain and ran "Unnamed Democrat", who was beating Bush by a wide margin before the primaries.
To: PlushieWithTeeth
Is this a US 9th Circuit Court question or US Supreme Court question?
14
posted on
09/01/2004 3:32:27 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Why isn't Berger in jail?)
To: PlushieWithTeeth
Loosen that tin foil a bit. It's cutting off the circulation.
15
posted on
09/01/2004 3:33:17 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
To: swilhelm73
So, the Dems could switch out Hillary for Kerry at any time? His campaign seems to be in a avalanche-type mudslide lately. How would this affect overseas voters?
To: PlushieWithTeeth
Bush is in this to win, whatever the ups and downs of the polls. Or were you referring to the 'Rat party?
To: Prost1
Neither...it's a State question.
18
posted on
09/01/2004 3:34:41 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
To: Andyman
What I mean is, what does the law matter to Dumbascraps?Of course not, but in a national election the Democrats would have to get the US Supreme Court's "okay" to break election laws. Although there is always the possibility the US Supreme Court might let them break the law (remember - - the doddering O'Connor has been all over the map lately and it is unknown whether she is still fully aware) the rats would certainly not get the free ride they got from the thoroughly corrupt New Jersey Supreme Court.
To: Glenn
Not kind. I think it's a legitimate question seeing how fast Kerry is falling and it's quite apparent that there is no rule a Dem won't bend or break.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson