Posted on 08/31/2004 9:43:33 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
Britney Spears has been banned from a political party conference-for being too sexy.
The blonde singer, who is a supporter of George W. Bush, was due to play at the Republican National Convention in New York.
But Britney, whose raunchy image was seen as 'potentially doing more bad than good' for the party, was rejected by top politicians after it was leaked that she was to make a surprise appearance.
An insider said, 'We are a serious political party and don't need Britney to promote us.'
'Besides, with the headlines she has been recently attracting it would do more harm than good to the Bush cause.'
britney spears is not sexy. she is slutty. cheap. whorish. kiddy porn fantasy. but not sexy.
now ann coulter --- she's SEXY. laura ingraham -- oh, baby. jeanne kirkpatrick. condi rice. the fox news bunnies. say, did you ever notice how republican women are infinitely better looking than the demo pie wagons (with a tip'o'the cap to the aforementioned ms coulter)?
Actually they should have allowed her to be there and sing the national Anthem or America the Beautiful. This would have been a big M-TV reach out to hook up kids on the College scene to show its ok to be a Republican. Not all of us are on the far right and the reality is that America doesn't want far left or far right. American's want straight ahead.
We've got Jaci Velasquez tonight singing gospel for the same demographics..
Let Brit show that she really wants to clean her act up a little bit..
There is nothing wrong with Britney
___________
LOL.
Getting married for 55 hours.
Dressing like a cheap hooker.
Being one of the worst possible role models for young girls.
Sucking face with Madonna on stage.
You're right. I'm almost positive that each of those items is part of the GOP plank.
So, anything is OK as long as you're for Bush. I think I heard that Marilyn Manson is also for Bush. He represents the androgynous wing of the GOP.
(ok, I was just kidding about Marilyn Manson, I really meant Charles Manson)
Britney Spears makes vacuous, vapid nitwits look like PhD.'s
Methinks you are spending a tad too much time watching Entertainment Tonight.
Britney will do whatever is necessary to revive her already (she's soooooo 90's) reeling career.
Judging by some of her recent photos, Britney is in kind of a tailspin..
Somehow I do not think she represents the Party of Family Values.
Britney Spears isn't "straight ahead". She has projected a slutty, whorish image for young girls to follow. She had 13-year old girls singing "hit me again". Wanna guess what the meaning was there? It's not far-right to reject that kind of kiddie-porn. It's sensible. You are free to play her records in your room, car or whatever and buy her poster for your children. Let's just not put the presidential stamp on it.
oh please - weve all those idiots in the elephant hats running around
Stupid move - she's wildly popular in the teen crowd & Wayne Newton aint cuttin it
Leave it to the pubs to screw up another wet dream
Right....
she is slutty. cheap. whorish.
You say that like its a bad thing. Not talking role model, obviously. But sexy? Of course!
now ann coulter --- she's SEXY. laura ingraham -- oh, baby. jeanne kirkpatrick.
JEANNE KIRKPATRICK?????? Sexier than Britney Spears?? Dude, you are delusional. I'd post the pictures, but I like Kirkpatrick's politics, and comparing her looks to Spears' would be unfair.
As for Coulter and Ingraham....
I've seen one of them up very close. And to be honest, I don't think she's even average looking. And both are too skinny. Spears is a workout freak, and has an athletic figue and strong legs. That's just a plus -- no question she's in better shape than the other two.
Never let politics or morals get in the way of objective judgments about sexiness.
Down, boy...
I agree...play a party, get interviewed by local news, say you support the President and wouldn't want to do anyhting that would harm him, even though it seems a bit rediculous....
Glad you're so confident
Given her recent history, I personally think that she's capable of absolutely anything.
As they used to say, "If you put her brain in a bird, it'd fly backwards."
"...Getting married for 55 hours.
Dressing like a cheap hooker.
Being one of the worst possible role models for young girls.
Sucking face with Madonna on stage..."
Well yes she has made some mistakes but on the other hand if she can tell the Hollywood Left to stuff it then she has some remarkable virtues too. I don't think she dresses like a hooker. I think she dresses very provacatively but not like a hooker. She is no worse of a role model for young girls than the mean average TV show for young girls. As for the GOP we should get all the superstar friends we can.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.