Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. Times Blows Cover of Key Counterterror Agent
Talon News ^ | August 9, 2004 | Steve Roeder

Posted on 08/09/2004 8:13:33 PM PDT by capnhaddock

ISLAMABAD (Talon News) -- Pakistani intelligence sources say that the al Qaeda operative named by The New York Times as the source of information which led to the heightened state of alert was working undercover. Naming the suspect, Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, forced Pakistan to terminate its sting operation and hide the man in a secret location.

The Times identified Khan in published reports last Monday. It said that U.S. officials disclosed that a man arrested in Pakistan was the source of the bulk of intelligence that led to the decision by Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge to raise the national alert status to orange (high) last Sunday for New York City, Newark, New Jersey, and Washington.

Khan operated a sting to provide critical intelligence on al Qaeda's plans for future attacks on the West. But Khan's value and the intelligence gathered to-date was rendered useless when The Times story broke.

U.S. officials confirmed The Times report.

Although the alert status was heightened, U.S. officials claim that they have no evidence of an imminent attack. The Bush administration had faced questions that the heightened alert status was based on dated al Qaeda surveillance.

A Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters on Friday that Khan, a computer expert who was arrested in Lahore secretly in July, had been actively cooperating with intelligence agents to help catch al Qaeda operatives when his name appeared in U.S. newspapers.

Khan, described by U.S. intelligence as "a one-man al Qaeda communications hub," was using the Internet to contact and identify al Qaeda operatives throughout the world so they could be tracked and arrested by British and U.S. authorities.

"After his capture [in July], he admitted being an al Qaeda member and agreed to send e-mails to his contacts," a Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters. "He sent encoded e-mails and received encoded replies. He's a great hacker, and even the U.S. agents said he was a computer whiz."

The Times characterized Khan as "a kind of clearinghouse of al Qaeda communications" and "a vital source of information" on terrorist operations, yet chose to identify him by name.

Khan is believed to have connections with unidentified operatives who could be planning pre-election attacks in the U.S.

The officials said the communication from Khan, and his computer files, indicated that al Qaeda has surveillance intelligence on five U.S. financial institutions dating to before the 9/11 attacks.

Combined with separate streams of intelligence that suggested threats to the U.S., Ridge increased the high terror alert.

"Information from arrests in Pakistan, taken together with information gathered by the U.S. intelligence community, indicated that al Qaeda has cased financial targets in New York, New Jersey, and Washington, DC., and has recently updated their targeting information," President George W. Bush said in his weekly radio address.

In addition to ending the Pakistani sting, the premature disclosure of Khan's identity compromised a major British operation in which 12 suspects were arrested in daytime raids this week. British authorities quickly arrested al Qaeda suspects Khan had identified before they were able to go underground. U.S. officials told NBC News this week that one of the 12 British detainees, known as Abu Eisa al-Hindi, was a key al Qaeda operative in Britain.

"By exposing the only deep mole we've ever had within al Qaeda, it ruined the chance to capture dozens if not hundreds more," former Justice Department prosecutor John Loftus told Fox News on Saturday.

U.S. sources said Khan had intended to hack into both the Federal Bureau of Investigation's web site and a British official web site to destroy them.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; fifthcolumn; mohammadkhan; mole; nyt; slimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: capnhaddock

Good Going New York Times ... you are COMPLETE MORONS

Now .. who leaked this info to the Times>>>


21 posted on 08/09/2004 8:26:17 PM PDT by Mo1 (Kerry & Edwards .... they will leave no Special Interest Group behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Kerry was briefed on the terror threat on Aug 1. The very next day, Khan's name is leaked to the Times. This guy was in touch with AQ operatives currently planning attacks in the US. He was connecting us to the AQ network and someone decides to give his name to the New York f-in Times.

These are times that try men's souls.


22 posted on 08/09/2004 8:26:34 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock

bttt


23 posted on 08/09/2004 8:27:23 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (If only hamsters could vote.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock

You signed up just to post this story?


24 posted on 08/09/2004 8:27:39 PM PDT by Nita Nupress ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock
Didn't Kerry get briefed on this the day before the leak?

Doubt it .. Kerry doesn't have time for briefings

25 posted on 08/09/2004 8:27:42 PM PDT by Mo1 (Kerry & Edwards .... they will leave no Special Interest Group behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

Thanks I read FR all the time. This is the first time I've been outraged enough to post. Thanks Jim for putting this great site together. The interface is really great too.


26 posted on 08/09/2004 8:27:52 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LandOfLincolnGOP
Rice admitted this weekend that the administration leaked the agent's name. Someone needs to lose their job (and be thrown in jail) over this.

Unless it was done to take pressure off of...or divert attention away from other operatives working under deep cover. More valuable assets that need protection.

27 posted on 08/09/2004 8:28:24 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Goodnight, Mrs. Calabash...wherever you are.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock
And, tomorrow fools will buy the New York Times in what would have been the shadow of the World Trade Center.
28 posted on 08/09/2004 8:28:51 PM PDT by Barnacle (Refuse to speak Leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock

I can't imagine they would provide that level of detailed information - but if they did, and Kerry leaked it (or had someone on his staff do it), then either they set him up, or they are truly politically ignorant that these people would do anything to advance their cause.


29 posted on 08/09/2004 8:29:28 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LandOfLincolnGOP

she did? that they leaked it on purpose, or by accident?


30 posted on 08/09/2004 8:30:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Rice didn't say the administration leaked Khan's name, she said they confirmed it after it was printed, but they did it on background which means it's supposed to be treated as off the record.


31 posted on 08/09/2004 8:31:30 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

you're right, I can't see anyone giving that kind of information to Kerry -- unless maybe he was briefed by CIA. You never know what they might do. There's still a lot of Clintonistas over there.


32 posted on 08/09/2004 8:33:14 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LandOfLincolnGOP
You know, I support the administration, but this story is wrong. Rice admitted this weekend that the administration leaked the agent's name. Someone needs to lose their job (and be thrown in jail) over this.

Agreed. This was obviously done by a Kerry mole in the CIA intent on crippling the war on terror.

This is yet another reason why Kerry should be arrested for treason before the election.

33 posted on 08/09/2004 8:35:55 PM PDT by mastequilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock
Here's the Slimes original article (emphasis is mine). Reading between the lines, some here (including me) have speculated that the name was leaked to the Slimes by Pakistani intelligence:
August 2, 2004
INTELLIGENCE

Captured Qaeda Figure Led Way to Information Behind Warning

By DOUGLAS JEHL and DAVID ROHDE

WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 - The unannounced capture of a figure from Al Qaeda in Pakistan several weeks ago led the Central Intelligence Agency to the rich lode of information that prompted the terror alert on Sunday, according to senior American officials.

The figure, Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, was described by a Pakistani intelligence official as a 25-year-old computer engineer, arrested July 13, who had used and helped to operate a secret Qaeda communications system where information was transferred via coded messages.

A senior United States official would not confirm or deny that Mr. Khan had been the Qaeda figure whose capture led to the information. But the official said "documentary evidence" found after the capture had demonstrated in extraordinary detail that Qaeda members had for years conducted sophisticated and extensive reconnaissance of the financial institutions cited in the warnings on Sunday.

One senior American intelligence official said the information was more detailed and precise than any he had seen during his 24-year career in intelligence work. A second senior American official said it had provided a new window into the methods, content and distribution of Qaeda communications.

"This, for us, is a potential treasure trove," said a third senior American official, an intelligence expert, at a briefing for reporters on Sunday afternoon.

The documentary evidence, whose contents were reported urgently to Washington on Friday afternoon, immediately elevated the significance of other intelligence information gathered in recent weeks that had already been regarded as highly troubling, senior American intelligence officials said. Much of that information had come from Qaeda detainees in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia as well as Pakistan, and some had also pointed to a possible attack on financial institutions, senior American intelligence officials said.

The American officials said the new evidence had been obtained only after the capture of the Qaeda figure. Among other things, they said, it demonstrated that Qaeda plotters had begun casing the buildings in New York, Newark and Washington even before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Among the questions the plotters sought to answer, senior American intelligence officials said, were how best to gain access to the targeted buildings; how many people might be at the sites at different hours and on different days of the week; whether a hijacked oil tanker truck could serve as an effective weapon; and how large an explosive device might be required to bring the buildings down.

The American officials would say only that the Qaeda figure whose capture had led to the discovery of the documentary evidence had been captured with the help of the C.I.A. Though Pakistan announced the arrest last week of a Qaeda member, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian wanted in connection with the 1998 bombings of American embassies in East Africa, the American officials suggested that he had not been the source of the new threat information.

An account provided by a Pakistani intelligence official made clear that the crucial capture in recent weeks had been that of Mr. Khan, who is also known as Abu Talha. The intelligence official provided information describing Mr. Khan as having assisted in evaluating potential American and Western targets for terrorist attacks, and as being representative of a "new Al Qaeda."

The Pakistani official described Mr. Khan as a fluent English speaker who had told investigators that he had visited the United States, Britain, Germany and other countries. Mr. Khan was one of thousands of Pakistani militants who trained in Afghanistan under the Taliban in the 1990's, the Pakistani official said.

If indeed Mr. Khan was the man whose arrest led the C.I.A. to new evidence, his role as a kind of clearinghouse of Qaeda communications, as described by the Pakistani intelligence official, could have made him a vital source of information. Since his arrest, Mr. Khan has described an elaborate communications system that involves the use of high and low technology, the Pakistani official said.

The question of how much to rely on information obtained from captured foes has always weighed on the intelligence business. In recent weeks, even as they cited accounts from some captured Qaeda members as the basis for new concerns about terrorism, American intelligence officials have acknowledged that another captured Qaeda figure, Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, had recanted claims that Iraq had provided training in illicit weapons to Qaeda members.

Mr. Libi's earlier claims had been the primary basis for assertions by President Bush and his top advisers that Iraq had provided training in "poisons and gases" to Qaeda members.

In explaining the decision to call a new terror alert, American officials would say only that the evidence obtained by the C.I.A. after the arrest of the Qaeda figure in Pakistan had provided a richer, more credible source of intelligence than could have been provided by any single individual. They declined to say whether the "documentary evidence" included physical documents or might also include electronic information stored on computers, such as copies of e-mail communications.

The Qaeda communications system that Mr. Khan used and helped operate relied on Web sites and e-mail addresses in Turkey, Nigeria and the northwestern tribal areas of Pakistan, according to the information provided by a Pakistani intelligence official.

The official said Mr. Khan had told investigators that couriers carried handwritten messages or computer disks from senior Qaeda leaders hiding in isolated border areas to hard-line religious schools in Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province.

Other couriers then ferried them to Mr. Khan on the other side of the country in the eastern city of Lahore, and the computer expert then posted the messages in code on Web sites or relayed them electronically, the Pakistani official said.

Mr. Khan had told investigators that most of Al Qaeda's communications were now done through the Internet, the official said. After a message was sent and read by the recipient, the entire communication and related files were deleted to maintain secrecy, he said. Mr. Khan had told investigators that e-mail addresses were generally not used more than a few times.

The young computer engineer, who received a bachelor's degree from a university in Karachi, is the unemployed son of an employee of Pakistan's state airline and a college botany professor, the official said. Heavily built and 6 feet 2 inches tall, he speaks English with a British accent, and was arrested carrying a fake Pakistani identification card.

The Pakistani official said Mr. Khan told investigators that he had received 25 days of training at a militant camp in Afghanistan in June 1998. By the time Mr. Khan had risen to his current position, the official said, Qaeda figures had arranged his marriage and were paying him $170 a month for rent for his house in Lahore and $90 for expenses.

Mr. Khan was in contact with the brother of the Indonesian Qaeda leader Hambali, who was studying in a religious school in Karachi, and who was recently deported. Mr. Khan has told interrogators that his Qaeda handler was a Pakistani he knew as Adil or Imran, who assigned him tasks related to computer work, Web design and managing the handler's messages. His correspondents included a Saudi-based Yemeni, Egyptian and Palestinian nationals and Arabs in unknown locations, and someone described as the "in-charge" in the city of Khost in eastern Afghanistan.

Asked about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Mr. Khan has told interrogators that even the top Qaeda commanders do not know, the Pakistani intelligence official said.

Douglas Jehl reported from Washington for this article, and David Rohde from Karachi, Pakistan.

34 posted on 08/09/2004 8:36:10 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

This was on Newsmax yesterday and I sent a blistering email to the editor of the NY Times calling them NY Dummies and idiots for naming the agent.

Try this email address, at least you will have something to tell them off! executive-editor@nytimes.com This is what I wrote:

To the NY Dummies,

You naming the al-Qaida agent, Mohammad Khan, who work for the US is a treasonous act. You idiots!! Stupid!! You ruined our work with catching the terrorists. You are supporting the terrorists when you do this. May your stupid paper sink and be no more!!

AReaganGirl


35 posted on 08/09/2004 8:36:31 PM PDT by AReaganGirl (President Reagan gave us back our confidence. Now, let's help Bush to carry on Reagan legacy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

anyone have an address for DOUGLAS JEHL and DAVID ROHDE? they might want to hire some security.


36 posted on 08/09/2004 8:40:17 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Well lets not get ahead of ourselves. The press, for better or for worse, cannot be prosecuted for what they print, regardless of what it is. That's the 1st Amendment.

This is similar to -- yet much more serious than -- the Valerie Plame situation and Robert Novak. No one has -- nor should have -- called for Novak to be prosecuted on treason charges.

However, who ever leaked this information to the NYT should be out of a job at the very least, if not prosecuted for on any charges that may apply.


I find it interesting how "the leak" was the story in the media for the case of Wilson and his wife, but there's been hardly a peep over it in for this much more serious and damaging one.

Perhaps the NYT saw that Bush was making progress in the war on terror and decided John Kerry needed a little help. Afterall, what's bod for America is good for the Democrats.

Give the LEFT a RIGHT HOOK with CouNTeRPuNcH

Get the Rally Sign and Bumper Sticker Here
www.counterpunch.us

37 posted on 08/09/2004 8:40:25 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock

It was probably that CIA-hole "annonymous" that leaked the name.


38 posted on 08/09/2004 8:43:33 PM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LandOfLincolnGOP
Think of this scenario. This Pak is giving good intel, we blow his cover, so all his Al Queda contacts cut ties and vanish.What if there's another Al Queda guy under our control? All attention is focused on this one while a second or a third gets closer to the target.

The only other scenarios are the we have some truly stupid people working national security or we have a true traitor working in national security. I prefer to follow my gut. We feign incompetence, use the NYTimes desire for a scoop and turn attention away from an agent of real value.

39 posted on 08/09/2004 8:56:12 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: capnhaddock

Thanks for clearing that up about Rice -- big difference from what was originally stated on this thread.


40 posted on 08/09/2004 8:56:32 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson