Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Rice didn't say the administration leaked Khan's name, she said they confirmed it after it was printed, but they did it on background which means it's supposed to be treated as off the record.


31 posted on 08/09/2004 8:31:30 PM PDT by capnhaddock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: capnhaddock

Thanks for clearing that up about Rice -- big difference from what was originally stated on this thread.


40 posted on 08/09/2004 8:56:32 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: capnhaddock
but they did it on background which means it's supposed to be treated as off the record.

That's not what background means. Information given "on background" is expected to be made public without the source being explicitly named. Giving information on background is typically how administrations leak information they want leaked.

41 posted on 08/09/2004 8:57:55 PM PDT by LandOfLincolnGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson