Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 8/9/2004
TradeSports.com ^ | Monday, August 9, 2004 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 08/09/2004 7:34:59 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon

State % Chance of Bush Winning Bush Electoral Votes Kerry Electoral Votes
Alabama 97.0 9 0
Alaska 94.5 3 0
Arizona 71.0 10 0
Arkansas 63.8 6 0
California 9.0 0 55
Colorado 82.0 9 0
Connecticut 5.0 0 7
Delaware 14.0 0 3
District of Columbia 0.9 0 3
Florida 53.0 27 0
Georgia 95.0 15 0
Hawaii 5.0 0 4
Idaho 95.0 4 0
Illinois 9.0 0 21
Indiana 94.0 11 0
Iowa 38.4 0 7
Kansas 94.0 6 0
Kentucky 92.0 8 0
Louisiana 83.0 9 0
Maine 27.0 0 4
Maryland 15.0 0 10
Massachusetts 4.0 0 12
Michigan 30.0 0 17
Minnesota 33.3 0 10
Mississippi 96.0 6 0
Missouri 57.0 11 0
Montana 95.0 3 0
Nebraska 96.0 5 0
Nevada 52.0 5 0
New Hampshire 38.0 0 4
New Jersey 13.4 0 15
New Mexico 27.0 0 5
New York 7.0 0 31
North Carolina 77.0 15 0
North Dakota 96.0 3 0
Ohio 55.2 20 0
Oklahoma 96.0 7 0
Oregon 36.5 0 7
Pennsylvania 32.0 0 21
Rhode Island 4.0 0 4
South Carolina 96.0 8 0
South Dakota 95.0 3 0
Tennessee 68.0 11 0
Texas 97.0 34 0
Utah 96.0 5 0
Vermont 5.0 0 3
Virginia 83.0 13 0
Washington 25.0 0 11
West Virginia 52.0 5 0
Wisconsin 42.0 0 10
Wyoming 96.0 3 0
Totals   274 264


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; election; electionpresident; electoral; electoralvote; electoralvotes; georgebush; georgewbush; gwb2004; president; presidentbush; presidential; vote; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Optimist

Hey, who knows? If the UN monitors our elections, Bush could probably win Illinois and Massachusetts handily, since the Dem machine won't be able to manufacture all of those votes for Kerry. I can dream can't I? :-)


21 posted on 08/09/2004 8:01:33 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Kerry Lied. Soldiers Died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

I appreciate your hard work on this project. I always look forward to these posts. Having said that, I think that Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon and Wisconsin are closer than the chart indicates. If Michigan and Oregon have the gay marriage issue on the ballot Nov. 2, which it seems, as of now, it will be on the ballot in both states, it will be even closer.


22 posted on 08/09/2004 8:03:18 AM PDT by no dems (Ignorance is "bliss"; and every Democrat I know is "bliss-tered".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
There's the convention bounce we can look forward to. Kerry has held the spot light long enough. Now it's our turn. We get equal time, and the press owes us "big time."
23 posted on 08/09/2004 8:06:36 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rushmom
I don't quite understand that weighted probability thing, but you're projecting Bush loses? What do the weighted probabilities say about Kerry?

Right now, the weighted probability graph has President Bush slightly behind Kerry. California, New York and Illinois may be skewing President Bush's numbers lower.

Kerry would get 538 - 265.17 = 272.83 EVs according to this view of the projection.

However, with the exception of 2 states, the Electoral Votes are winner take all, so if President Bush wins the blue states in the map on post #3, he wins the election.

24 posted on 08/09/2004 8:09:09 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

How is the number "percent chance to win" estimated?


25 posted on 08/09/2004 8:09:21 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Has anyone noticed the lack of Republican air time, and 24/7 Kerry news on FOX? The law says equal time.
It seems as though the Republicans been saving it up for a last minute slam dunk.
Any one else noticed this, or is it I'm just turning on the TV at a bad time?
26 posted on 08/09/2004 8:12:29 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

If Al Queda realizes how close this election is they will refrain from any attack before the election, IMO.


27 posted on 08/09/2004 8:13:24 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
How is the number "percent chance to win" estimated?

This is determined by the price for the futures contracts on TradeSports.com.

The prices range from 0 to 100, signifying what the political futures traders think President Bush's chances are of winning the Electoral Votes in each state.

For example, a price of $53.00 for a Florida contract means the traders think that President Bush has a 53.0% chance of winning Florida.

28 posted on 08/09/2004 8:19:35 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: no dems

"I think that Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon and Wisconsin are closer than the chart indicates"

Michigan is full of Arabs; New Jersey is a hopelessly Democratic state. To be re-elected Bush needs Florida, Ohio, Missouri, and either West Virginia or Nevada. It's do-able, but no chip shot. People would like to punish Bush for invading Iraq, but once they comprehend what a jerk Kerry is they may decide to stick with Bush.


29 posted on 08/09/2004 8:20:09 AM PDT by doug9732
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

An estimate of the amount that an Al Queda attack will change the "percent chance to win" values for each state is needed. Perhaps if the "Bush has failed to protect us" message is loud and clear in the battleground states, an Al Queda attack would cause the voters to shift to Kerry.

In fact, Kerry is pushing such a message, and his advisors have apparently factored the effect of an Al Queda attack into their campaign strategy.

If Al Queda realizes that the Kerry campaign has studied this, they may be more likely to lauch a devastating attack, killing thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans.

30 posted on 08/09/2004 8:22:11 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Your map shows why the electoral system is so important. If it weren't for that, a few states full of liberals packed together in their stinky nests like sewer rats would be choosing all our representatives for us. The middle states, the most of America, would have no say, and we'd be living in a liberal utopia - the U.S.S.A., or worse!

How true and the EC is in pretty safe ground for no way are 2/3 of the states going to change the constitution and give all the power to the urban left wing masses.

31 posted on 08/09/2004 8:22:27 AM PDT by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Date Prob. Bush Win Mean EVs Std. Dev.
01/21 96.8% 341.5 41.1
01/26 95.5% 334.8 40.6
02/02 92.2% 323.8 39.7
02/09 83.0% 307.8 40.3
02/16 78.4% 300.4 39.4
02/23 76.2% 298.2 39.6
03/01 74.5% 295.9 39.3
03/08 68.0% 289.2 39.8
03/15 68.0% 288.8 39.0
03/22 68.5% 289.3 38.8
03/29 69.4% 290.1 38.8
04/05 71.2% 292.3 39.1
04/12 70.4% 290.6 38.1
04/19 68.6% 288.1 36.7
04/26 64.9% 284.5 36.3
05/03 66.3% 285.7 36.3
05/10 65.6% 285.3 36.8
05/17 65.2% 284.8 36.6
05/24 60.0% 280.3 36.9
05/31 61.1% 281.2 36.8
06/07 60.5% 280.6 36.5
06/14 65.0% 285.0 36.6
06/21 63.9% 284.0 36.8
06/28 58.4% 278.8 36.7
07/05 58.7% 279.1 36.7
07/12 53.1% 274.2 36.5
07/19 48.2% 269.8 35.7
07/26 43.4% 265.6 35.0
08/02 42.1% 264.3 34.7
08/09 42.9% 265.2 34.5

32 posted on 08/09/2004 8:40:38 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdege

Thanks jdege!


33 posted on 08/09/2004 8:44:36 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
If Al Queda realizes that the Kerry campaign has studied this, they may be more likely to lauch a devastating attack, killing thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans.

Terrorist feel safer with a Democrat in the White House. Under Clinton, they killed indiscriminately. They bombed, Clinton threatened. They bombed, Clinton threatened. They bombed, Clinton threatened. They bombed, Clinton threatened.
They bombed under Bush, and he set out to kick their ass for it.
Like the Viet Cong beat the U.S. because of Kerry, the terrorist need Kerry to help them win as well. There's nothing a terrorist would like more than a kinder, gentler war on terror.

34 posted on 08/09/2004 8:47:19 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jdege

The standard deviation is large - this race is too close to call.


35 posted on 08/09/2004 8:47:40 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: doug9732
People would like to punish Bush for invading Iraq, but once they comprehend what a jerk Kerry is they may decide to stick with Bush. Hopefully. The uninformed, American public puts a lot of stock in a persons likeability.
36 posted on 08/09/2004 8:52:11 AM PDT by no dems (Ignorance is "bliss"; and every Democrat I know is "bliss-tered".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
this race is too close to call

No, it's not.

I put at 50-50.

50% chance that Bush wins by a wide margin, and 50% chance that Bush wins in an overwhelming blow-out.

37 posted on 08/09/2004 8:55:41 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

West Virginia. Time to work on Wisconsin and shore up New Hampshire: Maine may be doable as well.


38 posted on 08/09/2004 10:48:08 AM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I have lived in Iowa since 1974. Bush will take Iowa. Iowa is much less liberal, overall, than Wisconsin is; the old farmer-labor history exists in Iowa but nothing to the extent of its history in Wisconsin. Both houses of the legislature have Republican majorities, and the Rat-governor is, well, unimpressive would be one good descriptor. I believe that Republican Senator Grassley is up for re-election which should boost Republican voter turnout.

Bush will take Iowa before he takes Wisconsin. If Wisconsin is in play, then Iowa is definitely, definitely in play for Bush. Bush is just the sort of man, in so many ways, that many, many Iowans like (unpretentious, kind-hearted, honest and genuine, devout) while Kerry is just the sort of many that Iowans do NOT like (east-cast arrogance, cold fish personality, etc.).

Frankly, I don't think it will be all that close in Iowa, by Nov.

39 posted on 08/09/2004 12:18:38 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

I actually like that chart. Bush was trending downward all through the Democrat Convention. Immediately following the Convention, his stock ticked UP!


40 posted on 08/09/2004 8:04:21 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson