Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIMEWARNERCNN CHAIR BLASTS FOXNEWS: 'Crazy people exchanging views'... [Hilarious Drudge Photo]
Drudge Report ^ | 8/6/04 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 08/06/2004 12:44:44 PM PDT by joey9004

Time Warner Inc. chairman Dick Parsons Friday described Fox News Channel as "crazy people exchanging views," telling a group of minority journalists in Washington he felt that the channel and his own Cable News Network are two different services.

When asked by Univision Anchor Jorge Ramos why CNN was losing the ratings battle with Fox, he was not ready to concede that. He said that Fox was more like talk radio on TV, which meant that its viewers stayed longer because people tended to "come and sit down for an hour or two and listen to crazy people exchange views." CNN actually draws more viewers, he said, but said they were grazers who didn't stay long.

Parsons said he did not feel CNN was liberal, but instead has a bias for the truth. He conceded that journalists are often perceived as liberal because they tend to challenge the establishment. He did not make an overt comparison with Fox, but he did say that his news operation "does not give a corporate slant to its journalism. We don't tell them how to report."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cnn; dickparsons; drudge; moore; oreilly; sourgrapes; time
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
The story is pretty un-interesting. CNN blasting Fox news, blah, blah, blah. Drudge takes the opportunity to zing O'Reilly. Everyone go to Drudge and look at the picture.

(Headline: "TIMEWARNERCNN CHAIR BLASTS FOXNEWS: 'Crazy people exchanging views'..." Picture: O'Reilly interviewing Moore at DNC). Funny stuff.

1 posted on 08/06/2004 12:44:44 PM PDT by joey9004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joey9004

I watched the the Capital Gang the other day. CNN shouldn't throw stones.


2 posted on 08/06/2004 12:47:54 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004

3 posted on 08/06/2004 12:48:05 PM PDT by martin_fierro (Action figure sold separately)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

That certainly qualifies as 'crazy people exchanging views.

Point taken!


4 posted on 08/06/2004 12:50:12 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Do the "crazy people" include Franken?


5 posted on 08/06/2004 12:52:04 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
Parsons said he did not feel CNN was liberal, but instead has a bias for the truth.

Just a bias? Maybe he's factoring in CNN's agreement with Saddam to downplay criticism in return for access.

6 posted on 08/06/2004 12:53:14 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004

"Parsons said he did not feel CNN was liberal, but instead has a bias for the truth."


Christiane Ammanpour is married to who?


7 posted on 08/06/2004 12:54:38 PM PDT by cripplecreek (John kerry the Jim Jones candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
He conceded that journalists are often perceived as liberal because they tend to challenge the establishment.

Like during the CLINTON Administration, oh yeah, boy did they challenge the establishment. That's why they were called the Clinton News Network!
8 posted on 08/06/2004 12:55:50 PM PDT by GeorgiaYankee (Now Playing -- John Kerry: The Frenchurian Candidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
He conceded that journalists are often perceived as liberal because they tend to challenge the establishment

BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA. Yeah right, that's why CNN and the liberal media gave Sandy Berger a free pass, and why they tried to downplay every single thing Clinton did wrong.
9 posted on 08/06/2004 12:56:01 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
Aesop covered this story in a parable about 2,500 years ago. Can't remember exactly how it went, but it had something to do with a fox and some sour grapes.

This man demonstrates why CNN is down the toilet and will go further down the toilet. As long as the "leaders" CNN don't have a clue why people are rejecting them, the rejections will continue. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Backbenchers in Boston, The Unnoticed Democrats "

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

10 posted on 08/06/2004 12:56:08 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
"We don't tell them how to report."

'We don't have to, we only have very liberal reporters on staff."

11 posted on 08/06/2004 12:57:36 PM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004

I'm crushed, Dick Parsons doesn't like FNC.


12 posted on 08/06/2004 12:58:28 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
Well, if his "crazy people" on Fox includes Susan Ostrich and Dickie the Toe, he's right on.

Leni

13 posted on 08/06/2004 1:00:24 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Stop Global Whining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004

"Fox was more like talk radio on TV, which meant that its viewers stayed longer because people tended to "come and sit down for an hour or two and listen to crazy people exchange views." CNN actually draws more viewers, he said, but said they were grazers who didn't stay long."

My dumb capitalist ass thought the point of TV was advertising. I am sure the "grazers" are a sought after demographic by advertisers.


14 posted on 08/06/2004 1:00:59 PM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
HMMMMM..funny how it all comes down to.. CNN represents the left wackos, yet the CEO of FOX endorsed Kerry and sided with the left instead of the folk that MADE Fox what it is today. AS OF TODAY I WILL NO LONGER WATCH FOX. I am broken hearted that the CEO would slap his BREAD AND BUTTER folk by personally endorsing the LEFT. I have been a FAITHFUL, truly, FAITHFUL viewer. FOXNEWS was my only source of news from the tube. I guess I'm completely left with the Internet for news now. I AM BITTERLY DISAPPOINTED IN FOX! The CEO spoke VOLUMES when he chose to display his loyalty to the left. HE SHOULD HAVE JUST KEEP HIS FREAKIN ROTTEN MOUTH SHUT! SOOOOOO LONG FOOOOOX! It's Cspan for the RNC convention for me!
15 posted on 08/06/2004 1:03:56 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey9004
When asked by Univision Anchor Jorge Ramos why CNN was losing the ratings battle with Fox, he was not ready to concede that.

"It depends on your definition of 'losing'."

16 posted on 08/06/2004 1:04:18 PM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

"often perceived as liberal because they tend to challenge the establishment"

WHAT ..?? I've never witnessed CNN challenging x42's admin at any time or any place. As usual, they're lying through their teeth.


17 posted on 08/06/2004 1:11:06 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: America is the Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

But if you do that, you're doing just what liberals do (thinking that only liberals are qualified to give them the news). What does it matter if the CEO of Fox endorses Kerry? It's thinking like that that gives conservatives a bad name.


18 posted on 08/06/2004 1:12:08 PM PDT by joey9004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Parsons said he did not feel CNN was liberal, but instead has a bias for the truth."
Christiane Ammanpour is married to who?

Dick Parsons Ammanpour would not know the TRUTH if it bit him in the @$$.

19 posted on 08/06/2004 1:12:54 PM PDT by rundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joey9004

Liberals ARE the "establishment".

They consider because they are STILL the outsiders with the public that it means they have not ascended to "establishment" status. Ha!

Conservatives are the ones currently banging the wall, demanding the tear down THEIR walls to make room for the TRUTH. Only we aren't blowing up buildings to make our voices heard.


20 posted on 08/06/2004 1:12:59 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson