Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Activity Among Animals Stirs Debate
National Geographic News ^ | July 23, 2004 | James Owen

Posted on 07/24/2004 2:58:27 PM PDT by Cracker72

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: cyborg
"I had a bisexual chicken."

Did you have to buy it dinner and a few drinks first?

:-)

21 posted on 07/24/2004 3:27:50 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72

22 posted on 07/24/2004 3:29:36 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I had a bisexual chicken.

That reminds me of a verrrrry old joke:

My uncle was raising chickens and realized that he would soon need to replace his aging rooster. When the new rooster arrived on the scene, he and the older rooster had a conversation that went something like this:

Older rooster: OK, young'un. We both know there can only be one rooster here. Let's race twice around the coop to see who's really the better rooster and he can stay.

Younger rooster: Fine. As old as you are, I'm sure to beat you.

Older rooster: Well, in that case, how about giving me a ten foot head start?

The younger rooster agrees and they start the race. Halfway through the race, just as the younger rooster is catching up with the older one, my uncle sees them and shoots the younger one. "Darn it," he says, "that's the third gay rooster I've gotten in a row."

23 posted on 07/24/2004 3:30:12 PM PDT by Bob (Sorry, I couldn't help myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72

I caught my bulldog listening to Broadway show tunes.


24 posted on 07/24/2004 3:30:16 PM PDT by clintonh8r ("Just because I could.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

hehehe he didn't that much encouragement ;-)


25 posted on 07/24/2004 3:30:20 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bob

LOL


26 posted on 07/24/2004 3:31:01 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72

Well, I guess we know which species will be extinct. The ones that don't reproduce.


27 posted on 07/24/2004 3:33:10 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Well, I suppose if somebody has enough time to sit on the porch and watch the dogs f**k, they might want to debate someone about it.


28 posted on 07/24/2004 3:37:46 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72
Filmmakers recently went in search of homosexual wild animals as part of a National Geographic Ultimate Explorer documentary about the female's role in the mating game.

I wonder how long they had to search (the question being, 'What percentage, outside of anecdotal observation, is really homosexual?')

This ain't science, folks. It's voyeurism...

29 posted on 07/24/2004 3:39:10 PM PDT by IncPen (Proud member of the Half Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72
Guess that's why it is "animalistic".
30 posted on 07/24/2004 3:41:37 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A republic, if we can revive it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
The ones that don't reproduce.

But humans supposedly evolved from something - no? I'm surprised we made it at all...

31 posted on 07/24/2004 3:42:46 PM PDT by Libloather (What did he stow - and when did he stow it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Damn you, you beat me to it! LMAO :-)


32 posted on 07/24/2004 3:47:34 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Liberals cannot lead, if we refuse to follow..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gilliam
Supposedly humans know right from wrong, animals don't.

Have you seen some of the stuff humans do?

33 posted on 07/24/2004 3:49:38 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

I know liberals who suffer from PTPD (post traumatic poddle disorder) who would find that picture terribly...poddle (hey, you spend 4 hours in the VFW drinking Bud Light, and come home to a photo like this- what were you thinking, for crying out loud...) :)


34 posted on 07/24/2004 3:50:56 PM PDT by nicko (CW3 Ret.-"Lt., you need to just unass the AO-I know what I'm doing-that goes for you too, Major...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nicko

Was it the pink boa that got to you?

Or was it the puppy dog eyes?


35 posted on 07/24/2004 3:52:23 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

"Homosexual Activity Among Animals Stirs Debate"

Poof was found when some dogs and cats were found decorating Bowser's doghouse with taffeta curtains and matching coasters for the coffee table.


36 posted on 07/24/2004 3:59:30 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (I want to die in my sleep like Gramps -- not yelling and screaming like those in his car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72

This c*** sounds like the stuff Hitler use to spout.


37 posted on 07/24/2004 4:02:07 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam
"Many animals kill their young."

That's right.

They also defecate/urinate/mate publicly and settle their differences by attacking and biting.

There is still very broad agreement that such behavior is not allowable for people.

38 posted on 07/24/2004 4:02:53 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cracker72
This is a crock, as usual.

I noticed that they were never once specific about the alleged behavior, choosing instead to say things like "formed sexual bonds," "would be x-rated," "even had sex," and so on. I think most of this animal "gayness" is in the minds of the beholders, but that won't stop them from bombarding culture with fraudulent factoids and contextually distorted anecdotes ad infinitum, just because.

39 posted on 07/24/2004 4:06:34 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
"This is similar to the argument of play in young animals to get their brain and muscles to work effectively and together. Off the back of this, there's the possibility you can get individuals locked into this phase for the rest of their lives as a result of the social environment they grow up in."

This argues for NOT allowing homosexuals into the elementary and middle schools. These kids have enough confusion about sex, they don't need homosexual advocates making them think that if they don't really like the opposite sex yet, that they must be homosexual. Could be they are just late bloomers and will find they like the opposite sex later on in high school or college. We shouldn't be pushing little kids into sexual activity by sexualizing EVERYTHING with which they come in contact like clothing, TV shows, etc.

40 posted on 07/24/2004 4:08:14 PM PDT by SuziQ (Bush in 2004-Because we MUST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson