Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Sacrifice Was Rarer Than Thought
ABC Science News ^ | 7-22-2004 | Anna Salleh

Posted on 07/22/2004 4:53:50 PM PDT by blam

Human sacrifice was rarer than thought Anna Salleh in Brisbane
ABC Science Online
Thursday, 22 July 2004

Did this skull from the Lichtenstein cave come from someone who was sacrificed or who died naturally? (Image: Stefan Flindt)

Bronze Age ritual human sacrifice may have been rarer than believed, according to a unique study of ancient DNA from bones in central Europe.

German anthropologist Dr Susanne Hummel from the University of Göttingen presented her team's research at a recent ancient DNA conference in Brisbane, Australia.

Hummel said the research was also the first to use ancient DNA to complete a family tree from human prehistoric remains.

The researchers have been looking at 3000-year old human bones from the remains of about 40 people found in the Lichtenstein cave, in Lower Saxony, north-western Germany.

The cave was discovered in the 1980s and is one of a few sites in central Europe where human Bronze Age bones have been found.

Bronze Age humans were most likely to cremate their dead, which left little in the way of bones.

But Hummel said the presence of bones in this and other caves led archaeologists to conclude that these were sites of ritual human sacrifice.

Cut marks on the skulls and upper and lower limb bones found at the sites supported their conclusion.

"In the beginning it was thought [the Lichtenstein cave] was another site of human sacrifice," Hummel told ABC Science Online. "They thought living people had been led into the cave and killed there somehow."

But Hummel and team analysed the bones and found no signs of violence. She also found the age of death, indicated by the bones, did not fit the expected pattern for human sacrifice.

"Usually just one gender and one age class, let's say all juvenile girls, are sacrificed, because they are the most valuable persons to the society," she said.

"[But] we found that we had all age classes. We had the baby, we had the young people, the young adults, older adults and people who were really old, like 70 years old."

DNA analysis reveals a surprise

To settle the question of whether this site was indeed a burial site rather than a site of ritual sacrifice, the researchers analysed DNA from the leg bones to see if the people they once belonged to were related.

"If they formed a family clan then it is absolutely unlikely this was a sacrificial site," Hummel said.

She and her team extracted DNA and analysed the genetic fingerprints, patterns on the Y-chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA to establish who was related.

To their excitement the researchers found a family tree complete with fathers, mothers, children and grandparents.

"It was fascinating to think that you have just these tiny bone pieces and you can tell who is mum, who's dad and who are the kids, 3000 years ago," said Hummel, adding this was the first prehistoric family tree to have been identified.

Inside the Lichtenstein cave, which has remained undisturbed for thousands of years (Image: Stefan Flindt)

Hummel and team have found four generations so far and expect to find a fifth by the time they complete their analysis.

"This tells us [the cave] is certainly not a place of sacrifice but that it's a burial site," she said.

Hummel added other sites thought to be sites of sacrifice may also be burial sites instead, especially as most of them contain bones without cut marks.

"Up to now, one never thought there was an alternative burial practice. One always thought it was exclusively cremation and everything else was some ritualised sacrificial thing," she said. "This idea might fall down."

If Hummel can reproduce her findings in one or two other caves then she says it would provide good evidence that burying bodies without cremation was simply an alternative, albeit less common, method of disposing of the dead. And that human sacrifice was not as frequent as previously thought in Bronze Age central Europe.

Cave protects the prehistoric remains

Hummel and team's molecular analysis was made possible because the DNA on the bones was so well preserved. One reason for this was the low temperatures inside the cave and the fact that the cave had been undisturbed since the time of the burials, she said.

The cave is 140 metres long but is very narrow with a very low ceiling often requiring people to move around in a crouched position.

"What is for sure is that during the last 3000 years nobody went into the cave," she said.

Hummel said support for this comes from the fact that all the bones and bronze and ceramic artefacts found with them had been covered by a brittle layer of gypsum sinter, a special type of calcium phosphate from saturated water that dripped from the cave.

Any intrusions into the cave would have been recorded in this layer, which appeared to be unbroken.

Hummel said that the analysis of ancient DNA has opened a new window on prehistoric societies, shedding light on everything from hair and skin colour to the cause of death, marriage patterns and related matters of kinship.

"We now have a very strong tool which can tell us how people were related to each other which is the most important thing which characterises a society," she said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; bronzeage; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; human; rarer; sacrifice; thought
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2004 4:53:52 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 07/22/2004 4:58:27 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Bible is the truth.


3 posted on 07/22/2004 5:00:18 PM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A family 'banking' ritual?


4 posted on 07/22/2004 5:05:56 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

We have all seen far to many instances of human sacrifice these days; homicide bombing, decapitations, murders, mutilations, and mayhem of every sort, all "sanctified" and given concrete, if twisted, religious purpose with the cry of "allahu akhbar!"

in ancient times, these people's ancestors worshipped Moloch, Baal, and a pantheon of evil; the name has changed, but the underlying spilling of blood, which is a demonic purpose in itself, has not.


5 posted on 07/22/2004 5:30:37 PM PDT by epigone73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epigone73
in ancient times, these people's ancestors worshipped Moloch, Baal, and a pantheon of evil; the name has changed, but the underlying spilling of blood, which is a demonic purpose in itself, has not.

Did you read the article? They have found an ancient family burial site here; setting aside that very crucial detail, we cannot ascribe our current values to a society that existed 3000 years ago.
6 posted on 07/22/2004 5:55:19 PM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

Did you read the article?

Yes, yes i did. i was attempting to use this piece of archeological information in order to throw into sharp relief that even early man did not practice the savagery all too common in today's world.

The people about whose ancestors I spoke are, naturally, the practitioners of the religion of peace.

the Talmud teaches that everywhere you look, there is something to see; i was using this article to see other things.


7 posted on 07/22/2004 8:34:20 PM PDT by epigone73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

man, more BAD news!
let's fix this--we gotta get out there and INREASE human sacrifices! it's for the children!


8 posted on 07/22/2004 9:45:41 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epigone73

Baal and Moloch were maybe not worshipped so much as enticed or appeased and in regions farther south and east. True, the moderns seem to have some Molochites among them.


9 posted on 07/22/2004 9:50:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; blam; FairOpinion; farmfriend; StayAt HomeMother; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; ...
Too bad their newspapers didn't survive. ;')
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.

10 posted on 07/22/2004 11:44:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Are you looking in the obits again, civ? Trying to see if rumors of your death have been greatly exaggerated?


11 posted on 07/22/2004 11:51:37 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I hate to inject yet another dissident voice here,but oh well..........

The BOG PEOPLE,many of whom were indeed ritual human sacrifices,were men,women and from different age groups;excepting babies and tiny children.

12 posted on 07/22/2004 11:55:11 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam; nopardons
no...I did not read the whole article but it sounds like more of this revisionist stuff about primitives being more noble and all that.

who was it who got in hot water about declaring the Anasazi (sic) and their cannibalism?

or all this talk about no cannibalism in Africa yet we are seeing it even today in west and central African insurgency wars.

now, if science purports that the ancients of western civilization are being discovered to be less civilized, or stole their innovation from non-whites or were more barbaric etc. then being all the more primitive is encouraged.

I trust very little science from any university anymore that has even the most remote social consequence to it. They all seem to declare a desired outcome to suit their always leftist multicultural anti-west/christian/caucazoid bias and then look for the evidence to support that even if they must fabricate.
13 posted on 07/22/2004 11:59:29 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
My death. Pah. I'm in perfect- eeaaaahhhh!
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.

14 posted on 07/23/2004 12:37:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Yeah, thanks, good point IMHO. I was gonna post the link, but then figured I was gonna go to bed right away... as we pass 3:30 AM.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.

15 posted on 07/23/2004 12:37:53 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I did not read the whole article but it sounds like more of this revisionist stuff about primitives being more noble and all that.
That was my impression as well. It's the Wonderful World of Disney version of ancient times, built to service some nationalist jingoist political movements. Zahi Hawass, Mark Lehner, et al insist there was never slavery in ancient Egypt.

16 posted on 07/23/2004 12:39:42 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

I did read the entire article. Very interesting stuff, Blam. Thanx for posting it.


17 posted on 07/23/2004 7:14:10 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
"who was it who got in hot water about declaring the Anasazi (sic) and their cannibalism?"

That was Christy Turner at Arizona State University...He proved it after finding a human corpolite containing human protein, etc.

18 posted on 07/23/2004 7:42:45 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Stephen Leblanc also got quite a bit of flack, like the Turners, for suggesting warfare among the Anasazi. I highly recommend Lawrence Keeley's War Before Civilization on the topic of the noble savage myth. But just like it's important not to ignore violence where it happened. it's also important not to imagine violence where it wasn't. If the evidence shows that these weren't sacrifices, that's fine, too. Archaeologists need to try to interpret what's really there rather than what they want to see.
19 posted on 07/23/2004 8:26:37 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

"we cannot ascribe our current values to a society that existed 3000 years ago"

Really? Why not? How far back can we go and still ascribe our values to a culture?


20 posted on 07/23/2004 8:31:28 AM PDT by RUCKUS INC. ("Wow, what a crapweasel." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson