THAT to me is the most damning of his actions.
We need to see the missing docs, the millenium memo, etc. I want to know what was in them.
bttt
Berger is a traitor, no matter what party he belongs to. He planned this and executed it and he needs jail time, lots of it.
I personally heard Kerry say that TWA 800 was a terrorist attack.
We're also now hearing that the documents discussed airport perimeter security....
Our leaders refusal to prosecute the Clintons and their minons for anything meaningfull is in itself ridiculous....
No heads will roll over this either...the trail of bodies from Iran Contra Mena are nothing to our leaders...
Ok City, TWA flight 800, 09-11....some of those responsible are dead, others never got caught and went home to make more terror...too others have been set free....those who left the door open for them are still in power or waiting in the wings for more power...
Anyone who will claim otherwise...is simply viewed as a tin foil head...it will all go away...wait for the 'we the people' to simply 'foh ghetta boud it'...short attention spans coupled with a need for entertainment...plus a ton of disinformation fade many an evil deed into obscurity..
This too shall pass.....flushed down the memory hole
imo
And guess what date is THE national day of Iraq, a holiday, celebrating Saddam's Baath party coup?
July 17th was also recently celebrated by Saddam holdouts in Iraq with massive car bomb attacks.
Read on:
"The White House is absolutely panicked that TWA Flight 800 might have been downed by a missile, because there is no defense; even Air Force One is vulnerable," observes Keating, the author of "The Final Jihad", a novel about international terrorism that employs predictive analysis.
"My sources within the intelligence community tell me government authorities may call it a bomb when indeed they know it was a missile that destroyed Flight 800."
Keating cites media sources which reported that more than 100 eyewitnesses interviewed separately told virtually the same story -- a bright plume of flame ascending rapidly from the surface which impacted an airplane.
Bump
From the article: Follow along: if a link is made in the public’s mind between terrorism, Flight 800, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and “9-11”, then what is the logical result? Surely, donations to the Democratic Party and to the Kerry campaign would dry up rapidly. Therefore, it is imperative to the Kerry campaign to destroy evidence of such a link. Enter: Sandy Berger. He is a person that had intimate knowledge of high-level decisions about terrorism, and access to the records of those decisions. Now, it is public knowledge that Berger has “lost” some of those documents. Were the “lost” documents related to Flight 800? The only person that knows hasn’t talked.
I am intrigued by the cover-up of what really happened to Flight 800. I clearly recall the initial reports and interviews of witnesses on CNN like it was yesterday and will always believe that Flight 800 was brought down by a missle of some sort.
My problem is that I am still having a rough time connecting the dots that lead directly to the Kerry camp. There appears to be a little bit of a leap here. Yes, I've heard John Kerry's and George Stephanopolis' (as well as others) reference to terrorism in regards to Flight 800 and Bill Clinton's immediate appointment of Algore to lead a committee to investigate and review airport security in the aftermath of Flight 800 is very telling. But, without knowing just what documents Sandy Berger "accidently" removed and subsequently "accidently" lost, this all appears to be spit in the wind. Everyone who has had a bone to pick with the Clinton administration seems to be using this opportunity to justify their conspiracies.
I am also a firm believer, based on evidence I have seen and read, that Vince Foster did not kill himself (at least, not at Fort Marcy Park) but how long will it be before somebody supposes that Sandy Berger was trying to remove documentation pertaining to Vince Foster's knowledge of Bill Clinton's campaign against terrorism because they have an affidavit from somebody testifying to seeing Vince Foster opining to a beggar on the street about the lack of effort in the administration to push through an anti-terrorism bill?
The point is that if people find out John Kerry knew that Flight 800 was shot down by a terrorist with shoulder launched missle, we are too far removed from the event for the majority of America to care. He's already on tape admitting to "atrocities" in Vietnam and a couple of dozen or so Vietnam era officers are on record as saying that based on their experience with Kerry, he is not fit to lead the country, what makes anyone think that Tom Brokaw and company are going to throw in the towel based on this new damning revelation?
I think about all of the lives impacted by Flt. 800 as well as those involved in what has always looked like a cover up. A single murder demands justice, but this is murder on a grand scale.
And not just murder in terms of human life, but also of truth, of justice, of the integrity of our trusted intitutions like the FAA, the NTSB, the FBI and CIA, etc., as well as of reputations of companies like Boeing.
And all to protect the sorry butt of one man: Bill Clinton. A man whose legacy still needs to be written.
I wonder if the Saudis will ever admit that the downing of their flight over Newfoundland was a terrorist act...
There is no way, ever, that TWA 800 becomes about Kerry, and only a remote possibility that it becomes about Clinton.
It has always seemed to me that flight 800 was downed by a missile, but if so, then President Bush ought to know, and therefore ought to know about a Clinton coverup of same. Nobody on this thread is asking, let alone answering, the obvious question: if all this is true, why is Bush continuing the coverup?