Posted on 07/21/2004 10:58:33 AM PDT by jmstein7
I don't know if someone tried this, but I just checked the Wayback Machine website archive for his site.
It looks like it was being archived for years... until June of 2003. To keep a site from being archived you have to deliberately insert a bot program to make the webcrawler skip over it and not document the site contents.... interesting that he wouldn't want his site recorded.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.johnkerry.com
Scratch that, maybe... georgewbush.com also stopped recording at the same time almost to the day so maybe it was a change in their policy regarding political sites?
They have their people monitoring Free Republic.
I would suggest they just enter the keyword: Soxgate to catch up.
However, this is very damning and unique, and I hope that Hannity, Rush and others get hold of it.
Thanks!
My friend if .30 carbine and you had not done your homework and alerted us, this may have disappeared into the etherzone.
Now it is part of Conservative Americana.
This was why I suggest a separate thread yesterday. Jim did it, and it is a winner for our side.
Can you spell B-U-S-T-E-D!
"I also just read where Hillary has been speaking lately on "port security" so she could very well get implicated as well. Wouldn't that just be tragic?"
I heard about that yesterday. I sure that if Hill and Bill ever slept together, Sandy was right in between them.
None of these libs are up on security unless they can spin it to hurt GW. So if she mentions ports in her speechs, that is probably help from Berger.
Her specific mention of ports was a flag. My suggestion is to fry Sandy and put the Clintoons with this on the back burner.
Not all of them. Kerry is having problems, but he's about as nimble on his feet as a hippo with hemorrhoids and Clinton&Clinton keep throwing marbles in his path.
These are some of the links I gave you last night that another freeper had.
This is a long post, jmstein7. For the lazier among us, what is the relevance of this? :) Cliff Notes version, please. RD
That report is probably the one that didn't get back in the files. No doubt used that one to stuff his 'cup.'
BUMP
But in fact, using Ashcroft's testimony, they themselves ignored the terrorists already here, they did nothing and DID NOT pass on the pertinent information to the Bush administration. In other words, they lied to the commisssioners and during the transition. And I'd say that's treason!!
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/index.html
John Kerry Names Head of Vice Presidential Search Process (03/03)
Statement by John Kerry on Protecting the Great Lakes (02/05)
I see a BIG GAP!!!
I'd guess the plagarism is correct...but not the bottom line. We still don't know what Burglar "inadvertantly" destroyed.
If Berger is cooperating with Justice Department, the real investigation may just very well be about Hillary, Bill, and/or the two Johns. After all, before Berger was an advisor to Kerry, he was an advisor to Edwards. In any event, it is now obvious to me that top secret information was illegally taken, and provided to at least John Kerry, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.
Good point. It will be interesting to see what was destroyed, and if there are copies.
Please... everyone, please send this as a "tip" to Drudge!
Now tell me WHY I just created a PDF of John Kerrys Website?
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2x45a/files/kerryucla.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.