Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale

"I also just read where Hillary has been speaking lately on "port security" so she could very well get implicated as well. Wouldn't that just be tragic?"

I heard about that yesterday. I sure that if Hill and Bill ever slept together, Sandy was right in between them.

None of these libs are up on security unless they can spin it to hurt GW. So if she mentions ports in her speechs, that is probably help from Berger.

Her specific mention of ports was a flag. My suggestion is to fry Sandy and put the Clintoons with this on the back burner.


68 posted on 07/21/2004 11:58:34 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Berger was an attorney w/o his secretary, and he just re-filed in the wrong drawers! Move On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave

If Berger is cooperating with Justice Department, the real investigation may just very well be about Hillary, Bill, and/or the two Johns. After all, before Berger was an advisor to Kerry, he was an advisor to Edwards. In any event, it is now obvious to me that top secret information was illegally taken, and provided to at least John Kerry, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.


77 posted on 07/21/2004 12:13:44 PM PDT by TommyDale ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

Hillary may have been around for discussions when those reports were actually written. (What kind of clearance does the FLOTUS have, anyway?) I think it will be tough to make an issue out of this, though, because port security is such an obvious part of homeland security.


192 posted on 07/22/2004 6:31:53 AM PDT by Flightdeck (Procrastinate later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson