Skip to comments.
Rescued: Data the Kerry/Edwards Campaign Tried to DELETE from its site! (Grampa Dave found cache)
Google Cache ^
| 7-21-04
Posted on 07/21/2004 10:58:33 AM PDT by jmstein7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
To: jmstein7
Those articles highlighted by dog, don't seem to be "top-secret" material to me.
To: Dog
I do not think so, forward this to the WH and ask them.
42
posted on
07/21/2004 11:30:22 AM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(Veritas vos liberabit)
To: M1911A1
A nexus between the pulled Kerry article and the documents stolen by Pantload was suggested yesterday by a Republican Senator:
SEN. GORDON SMITH: 'There is a curious connection between the removal of these documents and the Kerry press conference on port security...It's disappointing what people might do as they try and take the President down.
43
posted on
07/21/2004 11:30:22 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Nobody "inadvertently" takes sensitive docs in their pants.)
To: M1911A1; Ernest_at_the_Beach; nopardons
Here is my guess:
The wording of the deleted Kerry web material was lifted off of some of Berger's notes, or-
Berger is the author.
The first would be a major hit for the Kerry campaign, the latter would be harder to explain, as since it is not sourced to Berger, why delete it?
Right now your guess appears to be right on target. Kerry, also, held a press corp meeting and discussed these same specifics.
Now if they are about word for word from the a purlioned document, no wonder they disappeared from the Komrade Kerrorist Kamp web site.
Of course some Freepers with Mad Troll Disease will never be able see the linkage and will try to derail all discussions of the linkage.
44
posted on
07/21/2004 11:31:02 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Berger was an attorney w/o his secretary, and he just re-filed in the wrong drawers! Move On!)
To: Big Otto
Thank you. Yes, this is quite damning. Wouldn't it be a hoot if the Kerry staffer who assisted in the crafting of this speech engaged in a bit of plagiarism coping words or phrases exactly from the snatched intelligence?
45
posted on
07/21/2004 11:31:14 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Dog
"Was it ever reported the Bush Administration considered out sourcing the security to private contractors?"Yes, I remember that story. I remember saying to myself, not a bad idea.
Of course the story disappeared real quick when there was backlash from the gv agencies.
I don't have a source.
To: jmstein7; Grampa Dave
Mmmmmmm......nice work! Someone needs to ping "the usual" suspects (Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.)
48
posted on
07/21/2004 11:32:38 AM PDT
by
Talking_Mouse
(Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
To: Dog; Grampa Dave; gitmo; Jaxter; cyncooper; Petronski; M1911A1; Ernest_at_the_Beach; nopardons; ...
49
posted on
07/21/2004 11:33:10 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: All
50
posted on
07/21/2004 11:33:29 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: jmstein7
Wed Jul 21, 2:04 PM ET AP Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites), D-Mass., is interviewed by the Associated Press on his campaign plane, while flying towards Phoenix, Ariz., Tuesday, June 29, 2004. During the interview Kerry said life offers too much 'twist of fate' to think in such grandiose terms as destiny. 'When you lose Robert Kennedy, you lose John Kennedy, you lose Martin Luther King, you lose your very closest friends, you lose both your parents ... you just know every day is every day.' (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
51
posted on
07/21/2004 11:34:53 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: Dog
Has anyone sent this to Rush or Hannity?
52
posted on
07/21/2004 11:34:56 AM PDT
by
DaiHuy
(MUST HAVE JUST BEEN BORN THAT WAY...)
To: OXENinFLA
I think I was able to access it yesterday on the Kerry site.
53
posted on
07/21/2004 11:35:27 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(In the end, Democrats are just a bunch of jackasses.)
To: demlosers; Viet-Boat-Rider; headsonpikes; rintense; freeperfromnj; Grampa Dave; Sacajaweau; ...
54
posted on
07/21/2004 11:35:34 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: jmstein7
Check me if I'm understanding this, jmstein ...
In reading Skerry's February speech, we actually (perhaps) are looking at the information from burgled documents which outlined steps to be taken to avoid catastrophe for America. In other words, Skerry is formulating Foreign/Homeland policy from stolen (perhaps) information, under the guise of "I have a new and better program for America."
Disclaimer: Just thinking out loud ... just my humble opinion ... just asking an innocent question, etc.
55
posted on
07/21/2004 11:35:37 AM PDT
by
Pegita
('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
To: Petronski; .30Carbine; hchutch; Ernest_at_the_Beach
I should point out that .30Carbine located this cache last night and we got it posted on the live thread.
FR is so cool.
27 posted on 07/21/2004 11:20:55 AM PDT by Petronski
Fortunately I read your reply that had .30 carbine's great catch. Then, this data disappeared from the Komrade Kerrorist Kamp yesterday shortly after the data about it was posted here on FR.
Thanks to hc hutch, we can grab the deleted data if we hurry to the site.
Thanks to Jim for posting this thread. This data from Kerry deserves its own thread.
Free Republic is wonderful, and I hope that everyone donates regulary to Free Republic or is a monthly donor to keep FR viable and strong.
56
posted on
07/21/2004 11:36:21 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Berger was an attorney w/o his secretary, and he just re-filed in the wrong drawers! Move On!)
To: .30Carbine
57
posted on
07/21/2004 11:38:06 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: Grampa Dave
Kudos to all and setting up the stand-alone thread was a great idea. Well done.
58
posted on
07/21/2004 11:39:26 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Nobody "inadvertently" takes sensitive docs in their pants.)
To: jmstein7
59
posted on
07/21/2004 11:39:32 AM PDT
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: jmstein7
I also just read where Hillary has been speaking lately on "port security" so she could very well get implicated as well. Wouldn't that just be tragic?
60
posted on
07/21/2004 11:40:17 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson