Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C
What do some of the craziest events in recent American History all have in common? No, this is not another Blue Dress story, but it is about the biggest crime Bill Clinton committed as president. It was such a small political lie for him but it turned out to have incredible ramifications to our country. Slick Willy may be headed for the title of worst president in United States history, in fact, he might even qualify for the biggest traitor label.
And further more, you don’t even suspect it happened.
Just what was Sandy Berger doing stuffing documents into his clothes while preparing for the 9-11 hearings? Lanny Davis was on natioal news earlier today saying that the leak right before the Democratic Convention just had to be politically motivated.
Did you ever wonder how literally hundreds of witnesses could see a mass murder but the official report not only ignores these citizens but offers solutions that are physically impossible? Conclusions such as this are possible whenever the conspiracy label is attached. And what was all the fuss about Jamie Gorelick being on the 9-11commission? Why did we get bored seeing Richard Clark attacking President Bush in the 9-11 hearings? If you’re one of Bill Clinton’s boys or girls that was in his inner circle, the noose is tightening.
They know what happened but you don’t know, not yet.
In 1994, Bill Clinton was shocked at the Republican massacre in the congressional election. His chances of reelection seemed dim. Drastic action was called for if he was going to see a second term.
The first challenge to Bill Clinton was the Federal Building bombing at Oklahoma City in 1995. As documented in Jayana Davis’ book “The Third Terrorist”, McVeigh and Nichol’s were not the only ones involved in the bombing. It seems that there were Iraqi defectors from Gulf War 1 in OKC. One of the Iraqi soldiers got out of the truck with McVeigh a few minutes before the truck bomb exploded. You may recall the story during the Nichols trial in OKC earlier this spring concerning the surveillance tape that agreed with witnesses showing two men getting out of the truck. Later, the FBI said there was no surveillance tape. This same Iraqi later moved to Boston and was working at Boston Logan Int’l airport the morning of 9-11-01. Is it a small world or was something going on here? The FBI has never investigated.
In Jayna’s book, she ties the Iraqis together with McVeigh and Nichols. Read the book and listen to her interview with Jim Quinn from Pittsburgh in the WARROOM which was aired April 20, 2004. It is in the archives. It will open your eyes.
Why did the investigation focus on two Americans when numerous witnesses testified that others were involved? And of course the initial reports detailed that two middle Eastern men were wanted? What happened?
Bill Clinton knew that if it was shown that foreign terrorists were killing Americans in Oklahoma City his chance of being reelected would vanish. Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing middle eastern terrorists from the equation and concluding that two right wing extremists motivated by Waco were the cause, the only cause. There was no Middle Eastern conspiracy by presidential order.
Flash ahead to July, 1996 and an airplane leaving from JFK in New York City crashes off Long Island. Hundreds of witnesses see a missile shoot the plane from the sky but the investigation concludes that it was a center fuel tank explosion. Jack Cashill in his book on flight TWA 800 faces the same problem that Jayna Davis did with the Oklahoma City bombing a year earlier. WHY? Witnesses saw one thing but the investigation reported something else.
The crash of TWA 800 occurred before the Democratic convention. As in Oklahoma City, Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing terrorism from the equation. Richard Clark supplied the center fuel tank scenario, the CIA supplied the computer simulation and Bill Clinton was home free.
Flash ahead to 9-11-01: Bill Clinton has said several times that he first thought of Bin Laden when he heard about the WTC attacks. Actually it had to be Al Qaeda, not Iraq, or his “brilliant” plan might be discovered. But Clinton was not out of the woods yet.
The 9-11 commission is tasked with finding the truth. Jamie Gorelick is on the commission to ensure they don’t. Sandy Berger while preparing to testify is caught removing classified documents by hiding them under his clothes. Anyone who has ever held a TOP SECRET clearance can relate to the sinking feeling he must have in his stomach today as the news is released.
The lies that turned to conspiracy theories led to thousands dying in NYC and Washington, DC on 9-11. Instead of Bill Clinton taking care of business in Iraq in 1995 when Iraqi defectors were caught killing Americans he covered up their involvement to get reelected. His co-conspirators are still trying to cover up the biggest lie in American history.
One of the questions now facing Sandy Berger is will he get a deal? I’m sure he watches Law and Order occasionally so he’s probably familiar with the process. Sell out Bill Clinton and the democratic party and you may get out of jail one day. Otherwise, it just doesn’t look very good.
Bill Clinton, the noose is tightening around your neck. Your legacy is the least of your problems. Everyone understands you’re a natural born liar but most didn’t even suspect the havoc you caused with you lies in 1995.
Now everyone will know it wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was Slick Willy all along.
The Democrats are setting themselves up to fall hard, with no help from the Republicans. The missing pieces of the puzzle are starting to form an ugly picture of treachery, lies, and coverups.
I hope so. I was pretty surprised that Rush had him on a couple of weeks ago. He just called in, and Rush didn't challenge him on his dirtbag tendencies. But I suppose you can't just ambush a US Senator on national radio.
You should do it on pay per view.
bookmark
Even if we accept that Sandy Burglar didn’t shove any documents down his socks, he did admit shoving them in his pants and jacket pockets. He claims he was “sloppy.”
Think about it: in order to fit those documents in his pockets, he would need to fold them once, probably twice. I’ve never worked for the government, much less handled classified files, but I would imagine that folding them is a no-no. Berger would have known this.
The only way he could have placed those documents on his person without folding them is to push them down behind his waistband or inside his shirt. Are we to believe that he forgot about them, didn’t feel any discomfort, left that room, exited the building and went home? Did he notice them when he undressed for bed that night? He must have; he admitted “inadvertently discarding” some of the files. Apparently, he didn’t realize these files belonged to the National Archive. He didn’t notice “CLASSIFIED” stamped on them, presumably in bright red ink. He only realized, he tells us, what he’d done the next day when the National Archive contacted him. Too late. He had already “discarded” some of the papers. By an amazing coincidence, these missing files just happened to be some of the most critical documents, relating to the Millennium plot.
The liberal media will quietly drop this story when the Democrat convention begins. After that, they’ll return to their favorite topics: Abu Ghraib and Bush’s National Guard service. They’ll also make every effort to avoid mentioning one Joseph C. Wilson IV.
GWB is trying to protect the PRESIDENCY - not Bill Clinton - but the office of President of the United States. I understand, as I think it would be devastaing for the country, as well as world stability, to think that a president of the United States would cover up something of this magnitude
Yeah, when Vince Foster disappeared from the White House and wound up in Ft. Marcy Park that July day in '93, that was the only day in the eight years of the Clinton Administration that ALL of the security cameras at the White House INADVERTENTLY went on the blink.
And they all said it with a straight face.
What I have been missing in these theories is why foreign terrorists would participate in the OKC and TWA800 attacks but then fail to claim credit and threaten more of the same or worse. I haven't been following the discussions on these theories in any detail, so I may have missed the explanation. Can you fill me in on the thinking on that question?
Why not? Their deflection strategy, along with a complicit media and corrupt DOJ/CIA/FBI types has always worked before.
This time, we can't let the story die. Berger has to go to jail--no excuses.
I hope I live long enough to see the Sink Emperor and Shrillary in orange jumpsuits marked "Ft. Leavenworth" on the back.
Hey, these things happen ...
It would seem that inside his shirt would be a bit risky --- they could be visible, inside his waistband would not prevent them from slipping or being wrinkled --- to me the most logical place you'd put documents you were removing and couldn't be caught removing would be in your underwear which would help hold them in place.
FOR ALL FREEPERS, I HAVE 2 questions:
1) On what date was the first WTC bombing ?
2) On what date did Clinton roll tanks in WACO, TX ?
What I have been missing in these theories is why foreign terrorists would participate in the OKC and TWA800 attacks but then fail to claim credit and threaten more of the same or worse.
Someone want to explain to clinton that telling wes clark to point our tank at our own people didn't work ?
Exactly... and yet Burglar claims not to have noticed. Presumably he drove or was driven home, but wasn't the least bit uncomfortable while sitting. And this clown was National Security Advisor? God help us!
This story won't go away or die on its own, no matter how hard the Democrats and the mainstream media try to bury it or shade it from view.
No you don't
When a criminal operative for the Dems gets caught red handed as Berger was it is open season to conjecture anything you like until they explain themselves or disprove your claims.
The Republicans need to repeatedly put about some really nasty rumor or innuendo, through plausibly deniable but accredited sources (just as the Dems would use the NYT), about Kerry and clinton until it is either accepted as fact or the Dems tell the truth about what Berger was up to.
My guess is that they can't do the latter and survive politically, so it is open season on clinton and Kerry.
Hey snake, what was your role in all of this?
.
I agree. The media are trying to shift the focus onto the timing of the leak. That makes no sense. This is by no means the optimum time to leak this bombshell. The Dems would do it four or five days before the election (Ask Bush and (R)nold). Maybe it WAS a Republican who leaked it; if so... great! It's about time our side started playing hardball with these people. Kerrey, ben Veniste and Gorelick etc. have been leaking like crazy all year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.