Even if we accept that Sandy Burglar didn’t shove any documents down his socks, he did admit shoving them in his pants and jacket pockets. He claims he was “sloppy.”
Think about it: in order to fit those documents in his pockets, he would need to fold them once, probably twice. I’ve never worked for the government, much less handled classified files, but I would imagine that folding them is a no-no. Berger would have known this.
The only way he could have placed those documents on his person without folding them is to push them down behind his waistband or inside his shirt. Are we to believe that he forgot about them, didn’t feel any discomfort, left that room, exited the building and went home? Did he notice them when he undressed for bed that night? He must have; he admitted “inadvertently discarding” some of the files. Apparently, he didn’t realize these files belonged to the National Archive. He didn’t notice “CLASSIFIED” stamped on them, presumably in bright red ink. He only realized, he tells us, what he’d done the next day when the National Archive contacted him. Too late. He had already “discarded” some of the papers. By an amazing coincidence, these missing files just happened to be some of the most critical documents, relating to the Millennium plot.
The liberal media will quietly drop this story when the Democrat convention begins. After that, they’ll return to their favorite topics: Abu Ghraib and Bush’s National Guard service. They’ll also make every effort to avoid mentioning one Joseph C. Wilson IV.
It would seem that inside his shirt would be a bit risky --- they could be visible, inside his waistband would not prevent them from slipping or being wrinkled --- to me the most logical place you'd put documents you were removing and couldn't be caught removing would be in your underwear which would help hold them in place.