Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLINTON SAYS BERGER-DOCUMENTS FUROR IS JUST POLITICS: 'WE WERE ALL LAUGHING ABOUT IT'
Drudge Report ^ | 7/20/04 | Drudge

Posted on 07/20/2004 6:14:20 PM PDT by True Capitalist

CLINTON SAYS BERGER-DOCUMENTS FUROR IS JUST POLITICS: 'WE WERE ALL LAUGHING ABOUT IT'

Tue Jul 20 2004 20:54:50 ET

Former president Bill Clinton defends his embattled national security advisor as a man who "always got things right," even if his desk was a mess.

"We were all laughing about it," Clinton said about the investigation into Sandy Berger for taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives. "People who don't know him might find it hard to believe. But ... all of us who've been in his office have always found him buried beneath papers."

MORE

DRUDGE has learned: In an interview set for publication Wednesday in the DENVER POST, Clinton questions the timing of the Berger flap less than a week before the Democratic National Convention and two days before a presidential commission is slated to release its final report on the Bush administration's handling of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Clinton tells the POST he has known about the federal probe of Berger's actions for several months, calling the news a "non-story."

"I wish I knew who leaked it. It's interesting timing," he added.

"I feel terrible for Sandy. But I just believe his explanation because I know how much he cared about this ... terrorism business," Clinton said, describing his former security advisor as a "workaholic" who has "always been up to his ears in papers."

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; berger; clinton; clintoncronies; clintonlegacy; election2004; filegate2; laughing; revisionisthistory; sandyberger; soxgate; timingspin; treason; trousergate; whitewashgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-328 next last
To: eeriegeno; All
Maybe this time, if Ashcroft develops a spine, things will be different?????

Anybody here care to hold their breath on a bet?

221 posted on 07/20/2004 7:45:16 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist
Yeah - it would have been an excellent time for the Klintonistas to leak this. Easy to blame the leak on those nasty Republicans (timing, you know) but the story may soon be buried by the Commission report, then the 'Rat convention.

A very good time to get this story out there.

222 posted on 07/20/2004 7:45:39 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (I was humble, before I was born. -- J Frondeur Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tet68

I'd rather outlive him so I can piss on his grave.


223 posted on 07/20/2004 7:45:45 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

The "curios timing" angle is crapola. If this were "leaked" to hurt Kerry (by Pubbies) it would have been two or three weeks before the election not the convention.


224 posted on 07/20/2004 7:50:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
LAUGHING ABOUT IT??? THIS IS OUR BLEEPING NATIONAL SECURITY AND THIS BLEEPING CLOWN THINKS IT'S A BLEEPING JOKE????!?!?!?!?!

You are making a mistake by expecting Clinton's reaction to be that which would be expected of a sane person. He is at the least a sociopathic, and possibly even a psychopathic personaly. He cares ONLY about himself, and in fact he probably hates everybody else. At his core is a psychological "black hole" of rage, drawing all light into it's darkness yet remaining ever unfulfilled.

225 posted on 07/20/2004 7:50:22 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

We must have been watching two different shows (grin) because Bernstein was going on about how Tom DeLay wasn't a serious Congressperson (or words to that effect) and that DeLay was more concerned with redistricting in Texas, etc. He struck me as quite negative about DeLay and I thought Bernstein felt DeLay didn't have the right to use the term. But that's just one woman's interpretation, maybe others will have a read on it closer to yours. Be curious to get further feedback.


226 posted on 07/20/2004 7:52:09 PM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Why do we still love this guy?

Actually, Clinton is one of the very few people I hate, for the damage he has done to our republic.

227 posted on 07/20/2004 7:52:53 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist

"We were all laughing about it," Clinton said about the investigation into Sandy Berger for taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives. "

Yep 3000+ people are just having a whoop di do time over it x42
800+ of our gallant and brave fighting men and women are just laughing it up x42
Seems like anyone involved with you and you LEGACY endup either in deep chit or dead i guess for someone like you thats just a damn good time.

X42 hell has a special place for you and your ilk and the signpost up ahead says whoop di do !


228 posted on 07/20/2004 7:53:03 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (Most people talk a lot, few are up for the moment. Welcome to Freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
" For the sake of health problems I'll by pass the article but will say this...SHUT THE F UP YOU DAMN FREAKIN BASTARD RAPIST..I DON'T GIVE A S*** WHAT YOU THINK......ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh that felt gooood!"

You've just had what's called a "Cheney Moment"

229 posted on 07/20/2004 7:54:27 PM PDT by yellowhammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist
"We were all laughing about it," Clinton said about the investigation into Sandy Berger for taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives. "People who don't know him might find it hard to believe. But ... all of us who've been in his office have always found him buried beneath papers."

Hmmm, is that a clue? Should we start a "dead pool"?

230 posted on 07/20/2004 7:55:59 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist
"'WE WERE ALL LAUGHING ABOUT IT'"

Like in whistling past a graveyard. Demo bones gonna getcha, Slick.

231 posted on 07/20/2004 7:57:15 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl

IIRC, less that 25% of Clinton's WH staff had the required security clearances. WJC never took matters of security seriously.


232 posted on 07/20/2004 8:00:41 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Froggie
""It's just about sox!""

Heh. BLOOMERGATE!!

233 posted on 07/20/2004 8:01:13 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
If WSJ is right and Berger took documents out FIVE times, how the heck doesn one call that "inadvertently?"

He made the same "mistake" over and over. Most Clinton Administration officials, including "The Don" himself, did that quite often. But this is all the fault of the Republicans for disclosing this fact.

234 posted on 07/20/2004 8:02:02 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

That is correct.


235 posted on 07/20/2004 8:02:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist
"We were all laughing about it," Clinton said about the investigation into Sandy Berger for taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives.

Is this laughing about it in the same way you were laughing on your way to Ron Brown's funeral? Or is this a different way?

236 posted on 07/20/2004 8:04:41 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (The Democratic party has been hijacked by terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist

Go ahead and laugh all the way to jail, Sandy Bergler.


237 posted on 07/20/2004 8:06:11 PM PDT by lawgirl (is RNC bound! W here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: True Capitalist

Exclusive photo of Sandy Berger at the National Archives!

Can't wait for the real deal.

238 posted on 07/20/2004 8:06:15 PM PDT by pulaskibush (Now I know and don't know, and knowing and not knowing is half the battle- GI Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Berger has always been in cover-up mode regarding 9-11. When interviewed shortly after the WTC attacks and asked how long he figured the planning for this would have taken, he answered, "Oh, probably a couple of months" - an obviously irrational response intended only to deflect blame. For one so "dedicated to fighting terrorism" that was ridiculously naive, so my suspicion at the time was that he felt some culpability and a need to cover it up.

I searched the web for that specific Berger quote yesterday without success ... anybody?

239 posted on 07/20/2004 8:07:23 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: piasa; Shermy
[I think this Berger story was initiated as a preemptive leak - by Berger. Note the first reporter of the story had easy quotes from Bergers lawyer.]

Exactly.

Yes. However, the standard Clinton playbook for dealing with damaging news was to release it on Friday aftrenoon, along with the appropriate spin, so that their media sycophants would play the spin over the weekend, and by Monday moring it would be "yesterday's news". The fact that this story broke on Monday belies that te "leakers" did not have Berger&Kerry's best interests in mind.

240 posted on 07/20/2004 8:07:37 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson