Posted on 07/20/2004 1:11:47 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
SEN. SAXBY CHAMBLISS: 'Reportedly these documents are related to homeland security and then suddenly we see the Kerry campaign came forward with what may have been illegal documents. This is sensitive stuff and was a significant breach of security...Kerry knows better than to use these documents,' Chambliss says in a press conference.
SEN. GORDON SMITH: 'There is a curious connection between the removal of these documents and the Kerry press conference on port security..It's disappointing what people might do as they try and take the President down.
I didn't forget your qualifier. I'm pointing out that it isn't saying that a document is classified that is the classified information. It's the information in the document itself.
No, I don't follow the logic of your point and I certainly do not think this reflects poorly on the Republicans.
thanks for writing. I've been posting these numbers/emails all over today so people do just that! Let's see this story get some legs!
Fox News Alert! Sandy Burgler stepping down as Kerry advisor. LOL Is he really admiting he is/was an advisor to Further Left? LOL
Breaking.............
Cavuto, FoxNews, Berger is stepping down as Kerry's advisor.
People keep saying that when the obvious fallout is Hillary! will be implicated.
Has everyone heard that Berger stepped down as Kerry advisor?
I don't see a thread about it.
Maybe I missed it.
Shorthand version:
The Senators were saying Kerry benefitted from the memo theft.
Today, Kerry deleted from their website the press release that was the 'benefit' of the theft (allegedly).
That purged press release is in 101, to save it from the memory hole.
I think that Clinton lawyer was the custodian of the administration documents though ... makes sense that he should be called ...
I think that was part of his job to protect the documents so nothing "privy" is released to the different commissions doing investigations.
bttt
"Who? Moi? Seriously, do I look like I would use stolen top-secret material?
'There is a curious connection between the removal of these documents and the Kerry press conference on port security..."
Hmmmmmmm....this is starting to make sense. Sandy steals the docs; Justice knows all about it but keeps quiet (and keeps tabs on Sandy); Querry makes public utterances that reveal knowledge of the stolen documents; Justice then begins their public investigation of Sandy while all-comers take care of Lurch.
Am I completely off base here?
No you are not off base.
I will post a link to a thread posted here in March where a couple of republicans set a bear trap for Clarke and his testimony at the 9/11 hearings. Clarke is in really deep trouble here with potential perjury charges.
Is Sandy Berger going to be another Web Hubble? ..or will Sandy be going into the Witness Protection Program?
P.S. Sandy, take Rush's advise and avoid Fort Marcy!
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com
Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com
Alan Colmes
colmes@foxnews.com
Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org
Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm
Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com
Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com
Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/
Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml
I got these addresses from Media Research Center,
http://www.mediaresearch.org/MediaAddresses/mediaaddresses.asp#If%20the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
e-mail: conedit@ajc.com
Houston Chronicle
e-mail: viewpoints@chron.com
Miami Herald
e-mail: HeraldEd@herald.com
The New York Times
letters@nytimes.com
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
e-mail: letters@post-gazette.com
USA Today
e-mail: editor@usatoday.com
The Wall Street Journal
e-mail: letter.editor@edit.wsj.com
The Washington Post
e-mail: Letterstoed@washpost.com
The Washington Times
e-mail: wtnews@wt.infi.net
Kerry has removed a press release about aviation security from his website according to this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1175055/posts?page=1
Boofrigginhoo! Rules are rules. Security measures are developed for a reason. Sandy berger has to follow them. He should lose his security clearance for this at a minimum.
I'm not sure what the connection being made by the 2 Senate Republicans are . . . but . . .
It seems odd to suggest that stuffing notes in your clothes (including socks) and taking documents out of the area on several occassions AND "inadvertently" destroying them is the work of an obese slop who just couldn't get comfortable in the review area.
Odd. And disingenous.
I'm a lawyer. When we do mergers, etc., document review rooms are created and no one LEAVES with the documents. It's a no-no. Comfort isn't an issue. It isn't when national security is at issue either.
No facts, just innuendo? Well, while that works well for the Dems and a complicit media, it doesn't for the Republicans. As was proven by Marion Barry, even video doesn't seem to effect many Democratic followers.
Oops. Isn't that what David Gergen said would hurt Kerry? (Not that I have any respect for him, just that's what he said this morning in his spinorama)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.