Posted on 07/20/2004 12:28:37 PM PDT by Sonar5
Edited on 07/20/2004 1:08:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Cordless technology is an order of magnitude less secure.
Someone else susggested "shortsgate" and I think there was a "pantsgate" and "trousergate" as well. Many great ideas in Freeperland!
Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com
Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com
Let's FREEP Alan Colmes while we're at it!
colmes@foxnews.com
Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org
Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm
Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com
Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com
Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/
Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml
Hey Sandy. Are those documents in your pants or are you just glad to see me?
All of them are good, but to me Soxgate is so easy and catchy.
Just the image of this fat slob stuffing documents into his Sox should bring smiles to every Republican in the land and hopefully a lot of moderate voters.
thank you.
thank you.
Thanks Ernie.
reminiscent of the handling of the Vince Foster death by the PARK POLICE
To paraphrase that eminent philosopher Steve Martin (in "King Tut"), "He gave his life for liberalism."
Sorry, dude, but this convoluted patchwork of half-truths will never find legs. Even in reading your summary, I couldn't follow any discernable, concrete pattern of criminality. Most of your points have no relevance to anything. Kerry has a long phone cord -- so what??
Simply put, "Nixon ordered a break-in" this ain't. While I'm all for prosecuting the Clintons, I can't see how this "story" will amount to that.
Here's a dot to connect. When the geeks at the National Archives catch Berger with his hands in his pants, they don't call the DOJ, FBI, or anyone else in the Administration, but rather, they call one of Billary Clintoon's favorite hitman, Bruce Lindsey. And now, many months after the NA notifies Lindsey, and the FBI probe begins, the story ends up in the press just prior to the DUM Convention. Should we blame GOP operatives for the timing of the story? Perhaps. I'm sure that's what Billary and Bruce would like us to think. Look for more of this stuff as long as Bush's lead is in the low single digits. Remember, if Kerry wins, then statitically, Billary's next real chance to win is 2016.
bump
Sockowitz?! Aha! There is a history of sock related crimes!
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com
Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com
Alan Colmes
colmes@foxnews.com
Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org
Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm
Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com
Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com
Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/
Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml
I got these addresses from Media Research Center,
http://www.mediaresearch.org/MediaAddresses/mediaaddresses.asp#If%20the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
e-mail: conedit@ajc.com
Houston Chronicle
e-mail: viewpoints@chron.com
Miami Herald
e-mail: HeraldEd@herald.com
The New York Times
letters@nytimes.com
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
e-mail: letters@post-gazette.com
USA Today
e-mail: editor@usatoday.com
The Wall Street Journal
e-mail: letter.editor@edit.wsj.com
The Washington Post
e-mail: Letterstoed@washpost.com
The Washington Times
e-mail: wtnews@wt.infi.net
Although your doggerel is no threat to Dr. Seuss, your last line makes an excellent point. It is the exact same methodology the dims used with the Mamuel Miranda memos. As you may recall Miranda uncovered incriminating information stored on a common server used by both dems and republicans. The information contained a smoking gun showing that one of Ted Kennedy's staffers was trying to interfere with a judicial appointment prior to the Affirmative Action case involving the University of Michigan. All of the reaction by the democrats (and, sadly, some republicans) involved the "illegal" efforts used to obtain the data, rather than the incriminating data itself.
Did Nixon order the break-in? I recall he was only charged with the coverup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.