Posted on 07/20/2004 12:28:37 PM PDT by Sonar5
Edited on 07/20/2004 1:08:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Sandy Berger took a chance.
And stuff the evidence down his pants.
Then asked why? - it’s endless rants.
“It’s so sloppy in my pants”
Then newsroom lefties begin their dance.
“Look at the timing, not the happenstance.”
Great, I had this posted to other topics and keywords that were relevent, and somebody moved it to Chat ONLY, and deleted all the keywords...
Thanks, as I busted my butt to put this together.
You know, I've been a member here since 1998, and even though I don't post millions of messages, a little common courtesy would be appreciated.
I am very dissapointed...
nice work
#9 in your last section should be Berger, no?
If you contact the mods, maybe they can change it
a) as documents were prepared for the 9/11 Commission (or the Senate or the President himself), that person was screening possibly embarassing items and alerting Lindsey;
b) Lindsey got the ex-Clinton administration figure (like Berger) involved to ask for a "review" of the documents (for accuracy, of course);
c) the former Clinton administration officials then pulled or replaced incriminating documents before the 9/11 Commission or anyone else could see them;
Berger was just too lazy and/or arrogant to bring replacements, or the missing documents could not be covered up.
The most frightening thing is we have no idea if Berger's case is an isolated example of former Clinton administration officials.
If it is not, and if many people in government in different departments (CIA, FBI, Satte, etc.) were involved in pre-screening and deep-sixing documents, then neither the 9/11 Commission nor the Senate Committees ever saw the whole truth.
It's also quite possible that no one in the present administation has seen the whole truth either.
yes, #9 should say Kerry, Thanks...
And the Mods made an error and will be correcting the keywords, etc...
Thanks Mods.. :)
Regards,
Joe
that person= the person at the National Archives who alerted Clinton's lawyer Lindsey
I guess cordless technology, as many other things, is beyond him.
Great summary and worthy of the new key Index word: Soxgate.
It is now an official Soxgate referernce.
Freepers wanting to see the various thread tieins can to key words and enter soxgate to see the various threads.
Soxgate...Priceless..
It is so reminiscent of the Clinton years, when the documents from Vincent Foster's Office were missing after his suicide on July 20,1993, and somehow turned up mysteriously in the Clinton's personal residence in the White House on July 26, 1993.
Or How on May 16, 1995, Judge Royce Lamberth orders the release of ducuments on Commerce Secretary Ron Brown's trade missions and possible political influence on them, under a freedome of Information Act Suit filed by Judicial Watch, a Conservative legal watchdog group.
In October 28, 1996, when Ira Sockowitz, a Clinton appointee of Commerce , admists he removed classified documents when he took a new job a the Small Busines adminstration. The Documents are seized bye the SBA's Inspector General . In Novemeber, Dalia Traynham, , a Commerce Employee Admits Shredding Documentss from Brown's Files after his death.
Bump. Your #14 could be a political earthquake.
By the WAy ..WHO STOLE the few FBI files on John Kerry?
Soxgate...Priceless..
We can thank Ernest at the Beach for this incredible Keyword.
I predict before the month is over, Soxgate will be a standard on Free Republic and many other conservate sites and news sites.
14) Who else knew Berger stole documents. Clinton, Clarke, Holbrooke, KERRY...
This link was posted this past March, and it ties in with Clarke, whose stuff was what was stolen by the Soxgate Bergerlar.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1105766/posts
GOP Moves to Declassify Clarke Testimony (Perjury Trap ?)
Yahoo News/AP ^ | 3/26/2004 | DAVID ESPO
Posted on 03/26/2004 12:56:27 PM PST by AMDG
Top Republicans in Congress sought Friday to declassify two-year-old testimony by former White House aide Richard Clarke, suggesting he may have lied this week when he faulted President Bush (news - web sites)'s handling of the war on terror.
"Mr. Clarke has told two entirely different stories under oath," Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said in a speech on the Senate floor.
The Tennessee Republican said he hopes Clarke's testimony in July 2002 before the House and Senate intelligence committees can be declassified. Then, he said, it can be compared with the account the former aide provided in his nationally televised appearance Wednesday before the bipartisan commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1105766/posts
A few more dots!
The security folks at the archive site did not call the FBI, or anyone in government once they found Berger stealing: Archive security called Clinton's attorneys.
So Clinton's lawyers knew that security knew Berger was stealing; so Clinton probably knew; so McAullife probably knew;
but, Kerry didn't dump this spoiled merchandise guy from his advisory position, so Kerry DIDN'T KNOW.
Bill and Hill give Kerry the total shaft the week before HIS convention!
Game;Set;Match!
More here.
Good dot connecting. And don't forget, he "inadvertentely" stuffed them in his pants, his socks, and wherever (I don't want to know) a total of five times, according to some articles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.