Ginsberg: "Kerry Must Answer This ESSENTIAL Point Re: Sandy Berger"

My videotape of Fox Interview. ^ | 7-20-04 | Ben Ginsberg

[gakrak]

I agree we need to put these guy's in jail for this stuff.
Never let these deeds go unpunished, make them pay the price.

[sarasota]

Rush called it Trousergate.

[sarasota]

Rush said the docs contain info directly stating that AlQ were in the States in 1999.

[NonValueAdded]

Per Rush Limbaugh ... Kerry campaign just issues a Reno-era style "no comment during an ongoing investigation."

[ErnBatavia]

The Penguin community has got to be embarrassed...

[Steve_Seattle]

"Rush called it Trousergate"

If I were dictator, there would be a stiff fine for any journalist affixing the word "-gate" to the latest political scandal. It doesn't make any sense, and it isn't clever, but we seem to be stuck with it.

[N. Theknow]

How do you inadvertently stuff classified documents down your pants and socks?

FIVE TIMES!??

Same way Nicole and Ron inadvertently ran into OJ's knife several times.

[Christian4Bush]

BUMP for later...

Man, Rush is having a field day with this. Sandy Burglar? OMG!!!!

DimSpin: Nothing to see here...move on...Bush's fault...liar...

Let's see. Wilson? Liar. Burglar? Thief (ahem...allegedly)

If this story has legs, I want it shouted from the rooftops. Looks like the "Misunderestimated" poker player strikes again, without doing anything but telling the truth and acting with integrity. I guess that after 8 years of x42 and SWMNBN, the country never thought they could get integrity in the Oval Office again.

(SWMNBN = She Who Must Not Be Named)

[maica]

Believe it or not, I just saw two Senators, standing side by side, answer questions of the FNS anchor.

Sen Kit Bond (R) : IT's no big deal!!!!!

Sen Nelson, Fla (D): I appreciate what my colleageu just said!!!!

What is this ###?????

[Steve_Seattle]

"Rush said the docs contain info directly stating that AlQ were in the States in 1999."

If true, how do we counter the Dems, "So what? Everybody knew that."

[Badeye]

"Rush said the docs contain info directly stating that AlQ were in the States in 1999."

I heard that, but it doesn't make it true because Rush says so.

Easy way to clear it up. Release the documents Sandy Burgler bothered to return. That will give us a very good idea of what this is really all about.

Keeping them classified after this doesn't make sense.

[Quilla]

Yes, they take it as a personal slap:

;-)

[xm177e2]

I don't think Berger would have taken the documents so Kerry could read them (after all, Berger could read them in the archives, and relay the information to Kerry). If documents were taken and the "lost," it was to conceal information.

[votelife]

Berger Docugate ping


The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000

ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
LA Times 877-554-4000

[Shermy]

I've been trying to find someone who can provide a MOTIVE for what Berger did

Probably to protect his own legacy, more than someone else's.

[cricket]

"I've been trying to find someone who can provide a MOTIVE for what Berger did; determining a motive - and what that motive happens to be - will be the key to whether this story gets "legs."

Well, we know they were not 'good motives'. . .

. . .first and foremost; we know the motive was to protect; and prevent/hide from authoritive scrutiny - information that must be considered damaging/threatening; with the purpose to empower and protect, someone/some group whose motives and agenda are not served by the truth.

IMHO; that would be Clinton 'cabal'; so to speak.

(Think Kerry's name, despite his 'role' on National Security; is simply being tossed out as a destructive - one stone - two birds diversion; no more than a red herring; a favorite tactic of the Left.)

[Dems_R_Losers]

Put it this way....

If Kerry did NOT know about Berger's theft and the investigation, then Berger lied to him about it and must be immediately jettisoned as a campaign advisor. And it doesn't say much for the Kerry campaign's due diligence if they did not know about it.

If Kerry DID know about it then he has participated in a coverup of massive proportions.

And if Kerry or anyone on his campaign actually SAW any of the documents Berger took, then they may be guilty of a federal crime.

None of this looks good for Kerry, any way you slice it. Of course the timing of the revelation is curious; but that does not make it any less serious!

[twigs]

The docs were taken last October. How does that impact Kerry? ... I think this is pure CYA for Clinton.

I agree with you. Kerry and the Clinton's do not have the same agenda, so either Berger was working for one or the other. Since Berger worked for Clinton, if I was Kerry, I'd watch my back. OTOH, maybe that's why Kerry has the hundreds of advisors. He can't trust any of them, particularly those tainted by the Clintons.

[Freee-dame]

The Bush Admin never got the millennium plot docs, even though Clinton said he passed them on. Now, if Kerry suggests he would have taken steps to prevent 9-11 based on those documents, he admits to having prior knowledge- knowledge even the Bush Admin didn't have- thus, making him as culpable and responsible for 9-11 as Clinton.

Why were they in the archives but not given to the Bush Administration? Should a new administration get access to all state documents of the previous one? This should be a BIG story. We'll see what the partisan press does with it.

[Badeye]

I took a different tactic on this. I emailed O'Reilly, Gibson and Hume.

Everybody else on your list is undoubtedly ignoring any contacts regarding this issue in my opinion.

Thanks for the ping, please don't misunderstand. I appreciate that. I just don't think anything will be accomplished by contacting those other entities beyond waste of time and bandwidth.