Mr. Rohatyn is an investment banker and former(Clinton-appointed) U.S. ambassador to France. The Wall Street Journal is widely regarded to have a strong conservative biase in its editorial policy...
1 posted on
07/20/2004 5:50:12 AM PDT by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: presidio9
Wow, a lifelong Democrat is going to vote for a Democrat. Shocking.
To: presidio9
This is what it's all about:
A Kerry administration, I believe, would get a more positive reaction from Europe's leaders than is the case now... In other words, its more about satisfying the Europeans than about satisfying the Americans.
4 posted on
07/20/2004 5:55:13 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: presidio9
5 posted on
07/20/2004 5:56:28 AM PDT by
Rebelbase
(To democrats the truth is personal.)
To: presidio9
I did not read the entire article but the gist seems to be that Kerry is better because he would get along with the French and Germans. Why is that important? The author does not seem to say much about Kerry winning the WOT. Is making nice with Europe more important?
6 posted on
07/20/2004 5:57:02 AM PDT by
KJacob
(No military in the history of the world has fought so hard and so often for the freedom of others.)
To: presidio9
Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans
And this clown is an investment banker? I don't want him anywhere around my money!
To: presidio9
Felix, the French and the Germans are not our allies. The UN is not our friend. We are not corrupt enough to fit in. Kerry will change that, or he would if he got the chance, which he won't.
8 posted on
07/20/2004 5:58:48 AM PDT by
Bahbah
To: presidio9
Well, it only took him a paragraph to go from "why I'm voting for John Kerry" to "why I hate George Bush." What I've been looking for is some Kerry supporter to tell me why he is voting for Kerry, not why he hates W. Oh well, guess I'll have to keep waiting.
To: presidio9
I believe that their view of America's position in the world Another from the "Traitors for Kerry" crowd ...
To: presidio9
One thing this clown doesn't mention: In the two situations he uses to to show french and german support, the only reason Warsaw Pact forces weren't in Bonn or enjoying the nigthlife of Paris were the American forces protecting their worthless butts.
11 posted on
07/20/2004 6:00:31 AM PDT by
sticker
To: presidio9
I don't want to debunk the whole article (too time-consuming ...and tedious), but among other things he states that's it's too bad that France and Germany didn't go into Iraq with us. It would have been in their best interests he asserts. Then why is the U.S. the bad person in this arrangement Mr. Rohatyn? Why doesn't he just admit that he's a liberal and he'd vote for Kerry no matter what Bush did? Two terrorist regimes destroyed, a number of others cowed and submissive (Libya, Yemen), no terrorist incidents in the U.S. since 9/11, Al-Qaeda severely weakened and on the run, a booming economy, and this twerp thinks that Bush is a failure. Unbelievable.
12 posted on
07/20/2004 6:01:05 AM PDT by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: presidio9
Why no "Wacky Liberal for Kerry" alert?
To: newgeezer
It's pretty twisted that they are tying debt and deficit spending to Republicans now.
15 posted on
07/20/2004 6:03:51 AM PDT by
biblewonk
(WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
To: presidio9
This is the result of a more serious Democrat's thoughts, not one of the hate-filled crazies. Let's see if we can reply to this article with serious thoughts.
Let's cool off the comments from the comedian wannabes! We do have some pretty sharp Freepers! How can we respond to this in a convincing way?
To: presidio9
First, I believe that their view of America and of our domestic economic and social priorities will improve the prospects of a better future for all Americans; -- How on earth is it going to help me pay for my three kids in college with Kerry/Edwards raising our taxes and bringing in Nationalized healthcare which I will have to pay another $1500 a month for. I pay for their college out of my pocket, they don't have any loans or grants.
and second, I believe that their view of America's position in the world and its relationship to our allies will make us safer in today's dangerous global environment. = 100% PURE B.S. !!!!
18 posted on
07/20/2004 6:05:05 AM PDT by
buffyt
(Bush Cheney Victory 2004)
To: newgeezer
Actually when I think about it, Renaldus Maximus kicked Russia's ass by sound conservative policies yet we are suffering a real financial burden dealing with the pissant likes of Iraq. 85 billion here, 85 billion there and pretty soon you're talking abut some real money.
19 posted on
07/20/2004 6:06:07 AM PDT by
biblewonk
(WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
To: presidio9
Surprise, another bs article from a lib.
To: presidio9
More proof of what happens when you lower the bar on citizenship requirments.....
first gen Amerian my tucus...this guy aint no American
21 posted on
07/20/2004 6:06:19 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: presidio9
Was this a letter to the editor or was he hired by Al Hunt and works as a rat for the WSJ?
23 posted on
07/20/2004 6:06:52 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
To: presidio9
"Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans through tax cuts"
What a crock! Only a democrat could think that allowing people to keep more of the money they earn is a transfer of wealth. In the democrat world view, all money belongs to the government and if the government allows to keep any of the money you have earned, then they are doing you a favor.
To: presidio9
What is more, I believe that Americans are less safe -- despite the capture of Saddam Hussein -- and less well off, despite the rise in the stock market. Man, I love Democrats. "We're less safe, despite all indicators to the contrary, and we're less well off, despite the fact that we have more jobs, more homes, and more money."
27 posted on
07/20/2004 6:09:16 AM PDT by
ICX
(To think that all problems could be solved if people behaved responsibly is irresponsible!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson