Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Soros and America's Coming Election Crisis (Part 2)
RichardPoe.com ^ | July 17, 2004 | Richard Poe

Posted on 07/17/2004 8:03:05 PM PDT by Richard Poe

Edited on 07/20/2004 7:53:41 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

George Soros
George Soros and America's
Coming Election Crisis


(A Three-Part Series)

 Part 2: The Democrats'
Digital Brownshirts


By Richard Poe

 

"AL GORE IS INSANE [He] desperately needs help," wrote John Podhoretz in the New York Post, following the former Vice President’s May 26 speech at a MoveOn.org rally.

View Comments

Make Comments

Printable Version

E-mail Page

Many pundits have drawn similar conclusions about the "new" Al Gore who emerged that day screaming, sweating and gesticulating like Benito Mussolini on methamphetamine.

Lacking credentials in the practice of psychiatry, I have tried to avoid speculating on Mr. Gore’s mental soundness. Even so, his address at Georgetown University on June 24 cries out for diagnosis. Among other things, Gore said:

"The [Bush] administration works closely with a network of rapid responders, a group of digital brownshirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors and publishers and advertisers, and are quick to accuse them of undermining support for our troops."


Gore's rant against "digital brownshirts"
provoked an outpouring of parody
and mirth from bloggers. Go here
.

Rapid responders? Digital brownshirts? What in blazes was Gore talking about?

Gore’s rant against "digital brownshirts" must surely rank as one of the most extreme manifestations of "projection" ever to present itself to the scrutiny of medical science. As Gore is well aware – or at least as he should be aware, in his more lucid moments – it is the Democrats, not the Republicans, who pay Internet propagandists to lie, defame, dissemble and otherwise corrupt political discourse in America.

In the last two years, money from George Soros has ushered in a veritable Golden Age for Web-based Democrat mischief, much of it perpetrated through such high-profile Web sites as MoveOn.org. But if such a thing as a digital brownshirt movement truly exists, its seeds surely took root in the Clinton White House as early as the summer of 1995.

Senator Alfonse D’Amato’s Whitewater committee was then investigating charges that Hillary Clinton had illegally ordered some of Vincent Foster’s papers removed from his office after the Deputy White House Counsel’s sudden death. There was talk of hauling Hillary before the D’Amato committee for questioning.

No doubt adding to the First Lady’s worries, House Speaker Newt Gingrich told reporters on July 25, 1995, "There is plausible reason to question whether or not [Foster’s death] was suicide."

According to White House insiders, the threat of further probes into Foster’s death prompted Hillary, in July 1995, to order the White House Counsel’s office to produce a secret report called The Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce. Hillary’s report charged that a vast rightwing conspiracy financed by Pittsburgh newspaper mogul Richard Mellon Scaife had provoked unwarranted speculation on Foster’s death. The Internet provided a dangerously "unregulated" conduit for Scaife’s conspiracy theories, charged the report.

Circulated privately among Clinton-friendly journalists, Hillary’s conspiracy report inspired a rash of hit pieces in the press, demonizing Scaife. The barrage of anti-Scaife propaganda found fertile soil in the mind of Internet pornographer and former Army intelligence specialist Steven R. Kangas.

If anyone deserves the title of "digital brownshirt," Kangas surely lurks near the top of the list. As recounted in my book Hillary’s Secret War, Kangas’s Web activism had made him a minor celebrity on the left. The Robert F. Kennedy Democrats honored Kangas’s "Liberalism Resurgent" home page with their 1997 "Excelsior Award" for Web sites that "communicate the highest progressive ideals."

Kangas’s site railed against Scaife in words eerily reminiscent of Hillary’s 1995 conspiracy report.

On February 8, 1999, Kangas took action. He arrived in Pittsburgh on a Greyhound bus, with only $14.63 in his pocket. Carrying a Kel-Tek 9-mm semiautomatic pistol, forty-seven rounds of ammunition and a bottle of Jack Daniels, Kangas made a bee-line for Scaife’s office, on the 39th floor of a downtown high-rise.

Kangas was seen peering into Scaife’s outer office through the glass, but he did not enter. Instead, Kangas holed up in a restroom down the hall, got drunk and shot himself in the head. If indeed Kangas intended to assassinate Scaife, he appears to have lost his nerve at the last minute.

 

The Democrat "digital brownshirt" movement has come a long way since Kangas’s wildcatting days. Today, the movement is well-funded and tightly disciplined. Its headquarters is the Center for American Progress (CAP), a far-left think tank launched in July 2003. Headed by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta and funded with $10 million from George Soros, CAP serves as the premier platform for Hillary Clinton’s political activism.

One of CAP’s missions, according to its charter, is to run "rapid response" media campaigns, for the purpose of debunking and discrediting troublesome press reports. In this respect, CAP’s mission echoes that of the so-called "War Room" which Hillary first operated during the 1992 presidential campaign. According to the Washington Post:

"The war room was set up to gather as much intelligence as possible and quickly turn it to Clinton’s advantage. Campaign advisors tried to anticipate what stories reporters were working on in hopes of shaping those stories before they were written."

Critical to the War Room’s success was James Carville’s so-called "rapid-response team" – an elite band of spinmeisters who prided themselves on their ability to intercept a Clinton scandal report at midnight and turn it around to Clinton’s advantage by 7 am the next morning.

In view of these facts, Al Gore's use of the term "rapid responder" becomes less mysterious. It has evidently been a fashionable buzz phrase among Clinton spinmeisters for years. However, then as now, it was clearly the Democrats, not the Republicans, who had honed rapid media response to a science.

On May 3, CAP launched a new Web site, MediaMatters.org, which specializes in "rapid-response" work. Funded with $2 million in soft money contributions, Media Matters set to work cranking out daily reports that attack with robotic monotony virtually every conservative utterance that finds its way onto the air waves as a "lie" a "smear," a "slander" or a "factual error."

Among its pet projects, Media Matters has been pressuring Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to ban Rush Limbaugh from American Forces Radio and Television Service -- thus depriving our troops in Iraq of the single radio program they are allowed to hear that actually supports them and the cause for which they fight.

In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that Media Matters is leaning rather heavily on Bill O’Reilly to grant its president, David Brock, equal airtime to rebut allegations leveled at George Soros by – believe it or not – little ol’ me!

All of this would be grounds for amusement if these "digital brownshirts" worked in a vacuum. But they do not. Thanks to George Soros, they enjoy an extra-constitutional power above and beyond their stature.

For the first time in living memory, we are heading into an election where political speech will be monitored, curbed and potentially even prosecuted under federal law. Groups such as CAP and its offshoot Media Matters have thus gained the power to play informer, bringing to the authorities’ attention any political speech they find offensive, and which may prove punishable under the McCain-Feingold Act.

In the third and final installment of this series, we will examine how George Soros succeeded, almost singlehandedly, in bringing to an end 228 years of free speech in these United States. Without shedding so much as a drop of American blood, Soros has managed to undo the work of Lexington and Concord. And few Americans even noticed.

 


Velvet Revolution, USA
PART 1 (July 16, 2004)
If you enjoyed the election crisis of 2000,
you’re going to love what Democrat
leaders are cooking up for November.
More...

Freeper Comments Here (Part 1)


The Lies of George Soros
PART 3 (July 18, 2004)
How George Soros singlehandedly gutted
the First Amendment.
More...

Freeper Comments Here (Part 3)

=============================================

Richard Poe is a New York Times-bestselling author and cyberjournalist. He is a contributing editor for NewsMax Magazine and NewsMax.com, and runs his own blog at RichardPoe.com. Poe's new book is Hillary's Secret War. His previous book, The Seven Myths of Gun Control, is now available in paperback.

   



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: algore; georgesoros; moveonorg; richardpoe; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Celtman
I hope your're right, but I'm afraid the "average American Citizen" wouldn't even notice. Almost no one seems to be aware of how much "World Government" there is already, or how much it already affects us. Nor do they care (e.g., "We should not go into Iraq without UN permission.")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The average America isn't even watching they are working for a living.

Going into Iraq doesn't matter to us one way or the other "World Government is coming".

To quote a great general, "American's Love War and they love winning"
41 posted on 07/18/2004 1:35:52 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (There is no such thing as coincidence, GOD is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Grampa Dave writes:
Thanks Richard for this great 3 part series to wake up conservatives to the most dangerous man in the world for American, George $oreA$$.

You're welcome! Here's Part 3:

The Lies of George Soros (Part 3)
July 18, 2004

HOW GEORGE SOROS singlehandedly gutted the First Amendment. More...

 

42 posted on 07/18/2004 4:43:06 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Oh boy.
I have reading to do.
I see I am also pinged to part 3.

I'll do my reading starting right now.


43 posted on 07/18/2004 7:23:51 PM PDT by onyx (Kerry/Edwards: It's the hair, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

A rapid response alright!


44 posted on 07/18/2004 8:22:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I'm figuring 58% Bush 40% Gigilo 2% Nueter.

I fear an electoral college "coo-de-tah" as Rep. Brown of Floriduh would say.

45 posted on 07/18/2004 8:25:34 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (Suing hospitals and doctors into bankruptcy is NOT an American value, Pretty Boy Fraud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Media Matters is leaning rather heavily on Bill O’Reilly to grant its president, David Brock, equal airtime to rebut

Not surprising since butt is apparently Brock's major interest.
46 posted on 07/18/2004 8:35:17 PM PDT by Antoninus (Federal Marriage Amendment, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Look for the leftists to skirt the CFR by fomenting direct action in order to create "news." The sound bytes will be embedded in the stories by interviewees. Then notify the media so that they get the "spontaneous interview" just perfect.

It's fascinating to listen for such agitprop from KCBS, an AM radio station here in the San Francisco Bay Area. I must admit: their news editor is a genius. He/she/it strings the stories together to foist an overall impression almost seamlessly. I would bet that there are meetings to get the reporters to ask the right questons to be more easily organized for effect. It doesn't take long for the other stations to have it down. One can flip channels and hear the stories almost in perfect sync.

I believe in economics the principle is called "market leadership."

47 posted on 07/18/2004 9:46:04 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam presents three choices: fight, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

bttt


48 posted on 07/18/2004 9:47:18 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; PhiKapMom; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP

What has been amazing to me is the rapid gloom and doom responses that the old embedded Digital Brownshirt Trolls put on any thread that is positive. They are often on the thread with a negative to GW and the thread before the 20th reply is registered.

However, this year the new or old recycled Digital Brownshirt Trolls often beat the embedden trolls in negative response time.

Makes one wonder if they have spotter trolls who monitor FR for any positive thread that is posted. Then the spotter Trolls notify the embedded Trolls and new Trolls about the thread.

They do the same when a negative thread to the rats is posted. Within minutes they are posting a disclaimer or challenging the post with some old mantra.


49 posted on 07/18/2004 10:44:16 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Says something about the power and reach of this Forum!


50 posted on 07/18/2004 10:49:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

"Look for the leftists to skirt the CFR by fomenting direct action in order to create "news."

The LA Slimes, Gay Rhonicle and the other left wing canary bottom covers use their phony polls that way. They have a phoney poll and interview the people they want to interview to back up the poll.

Stern has just been apparently just been hired by a major tv net. So he can interview any lefty with a mantra against conservatives, republicans or GW and it will be news.

We will see billions of $'s of free air time for the liberals posing as news and news talk between now and November.

You nailed another reality: "It doesn't take long for the other stations to have it down. One can flip channels and hear the stories almost in perfect sync.'

In the fall and winter when I drive home from fishing in the evening, in a couple of hours I might get 3-5 stations as I go by one community to the next. It is amazing to hear the same lie over and over on from ABCBS and NBC and even some local stations.

Then the next morning I log on Free Republic and see that lie came from some major newspaper and immediately got spun over the radio as news.


51 posted on 07/18/2004 10:53:25 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
The LA Slimes, Gay Rhonicle and the other left wing canary bottom covers use their phony polls that way.

By "direct action" I mean riots, terrorism, "disasters," that sort of thing.

52 posted on 07/18/2004 10:56:29 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I have no doubt that the eco/enviro terrorist fringe groups will commit acts of violence and terrorism this year.

Also, we see very creative ways by the lefty mediots to "bypass" the CFR on tv, radio and the internet.


53 posted on 07/18/2004 11:02:12 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

You'll probably see terrorism in Europe with the blame coming here too.


54 posted on 07/18/2004 11:04:00 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

What country in Europe do you will feel will the next "Spain" re violent terrorism?


55 posted on 07/18/2004 11:05:56 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

My bet is France or Britain. Americans don't care enough about Germany either way to have that one really make it big in the news.


56 posted on 07/18/2004 11:16:49 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I'm sure that Brit intel has prevented more than one terrorist action in the UK.


57 posted on 07/18/2004 11:20:27 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
They must be bussing them in from DU and other places .....


They're EVERYWHERE lately !


58 posted on 07/19/2004 7:36:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

never heard of the Hillary/Kangas/Scaife connection (I was not much into politics at the time)

wow.


59 posted on 02/07/2005 4:47:53 PM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson