Posted on 07/17/2004 8:03:05 PM PDT by Richard Poe
Edited on 07/20/2004 7:53:41 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
"AL GORE IS INSANE [He] desperately needs help," wrote John Podhoretz in the New York Post, following the former Vice Presidents May 26 speech at a MoveOn.org rally.
Lacking credentials in the practice of psychiatry, I have tried to avoid speculating on Mr. Gores mental soundness. Even so, his address at Georgetown University on June 24 cries out for diagnosis. Among other things, Gore said: "The [Bush] administration works closely with a network of rapid responders, a group of digital brownshirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors and publishers and advertisers, and are quick to accuse them of undermining support for our troops."
Gores rant against "digital brownshirts" must surely rank as one of the most extreme manifestations of "projection" ever to present itself to the scrutiny of medical science. As Gore is well aware or at least as he should be aware, in his more lucid moments it is the Democrats, not the Republicans, who pay Internet propagandists to lie, defame, dissemble and otherwise corrupt political discourse in America. In the last two years, money from George Soros has ushered in a veritable Golden Age for Web-based Democrat mischief, much of it perpetrated through such high-profile Web sites as MoveOn.org. But if such a thing as a digital brownshirt movement truly exists, its seeds surely took root in the Clinton White House as early as the summer of 1995. Senator Alfonse DAmatos Whitewater committee was then investigating charges that Hillary Clinton had illegally ordered some of Vincent Fosters papers removed from his office after the Deputy White House Counsels sudden death. There was talk of hauling Hillary before the DAmato committee for questioning. No doubt adding to the First Ladys worries, House Speaker Newt Gingrich told reporters on July 25, 1995, "There is plausible reason to question whether or not [Fosters death] was suicide." According to White House insiders, the threat of further probes into Fosters death prompted Hillary, in July 1995, to order the White House Counsels office to produce a secret report called The Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce. Hillarys report charged that a vast rightwing conspiracy financed by Pittsburgh newspaper mogul Richard Mellon Scaife had provoked unwarranted speculation on Fosters death. The Internet provided a dangerously "unregulated" conduit for Scaifes conspiracy theories, charged the report. Circulated privately among Clinton-friendly journalists, Hillarys conspiracy report inspired a rash of hit pieces in the press, demonizing Scaife. The barrage of anti-Scaife propaganda found fertile soil in the mind of Internet pornographer and former Army intelligence specialist Steven R. Kangas. If anyone deserves the title of "digital brownshirt," Kangas surely lurks near the top of the list. As recounted in my book Hillarys Secret War, Kangass Web activism had made him a minor celebrity on the left. The Robert F. Kennedy Democrats honored Kangass "Liberalism Resurgent" home page with their 1997 "Excelsior Award" for Web sites that "communicate the highest progressive ideals." Kangass site railed against Scaife in words eerily reminiscent of Hillarys 1995 conspiracy report. On February 8, 1999, Kangas took action. He arrived in Pittsburgh on a Greyhound bus, with only $14.63 in his pocket. Carrying a Kel-Tek 9-mm semiautomatic pistol, forty-seven rounds of ammunition and a bottle of Jack Daniels, Kangas made a bee-line for Scaifes office, on the 39th floor of a downtown high-rise. Kangas was seen peering into Scaifes outer office through the glass, but he did not enter. Instead, Kangas holed up in a restroom down the hall, got drunk and shot himself in the head. If indeed Kangas intended to assassinate Scaife, he appears to have lost his nerve at the last minute.
The Democrat "digital brownshirt" movement has come a long way since Kangass wildcatting days. Today, the movement is well-funded and tightly disciplined. Its headquarters is the Center for American Progress (CAP), a far-left think tank launched in July 2003. Headed by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta and funded with $10 million from George Soros, CAP serves as the premier platform for Hillary Clintons political activism. One of CAPs missions, according to its charter, is to run "rapid response" media campaigns, for the purpose of debunking and discrediting troublesome press reports. In this respect, CAPs mission echoes that of the so-called "War Room" which Hillary first operated during the 1992 presidential campaign. According to the Washington Post: Critical to the War Rooms success was James Carvilles so-called "rapid-response team" an elite band of spinmeisters who prided themselves on their ability to intercept a Clinton scandal report at midnight and turn it around to Clintons advantage by 7 am the next morning. In view of these facts, Al Gore's use of the term "rapid responder" becomes less mysterious. It has evidently been a fashionable buzz phrase among Clinton spinmeisters for years. However, then as now, it was clearly the Democrats, not the Republicans, who had honed rapid media response to a science. On May 3, CAP launched a new Web site, MediaMatters.org, which specializes in "rapid-response" work. Funded with $2 million in soft money contributions, Media Matters set to work cranking out daily reports that attack with robotic monotony virtually every conservative utterance that finds its way onto the air waves as a "lie" a "smear," a "slander" or a "factual error." Among its pet projects, Media Matters has been pressuring Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to ban Rush Limbaugh from American Forces Radio and Television Service -- thus depriving our troops in Iraq of the single radio program they are allowed to hear that actually supports them and the cause for which they fight. In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that Media Matters is leaning rather heavily on Bill OReilly to grant its president, David Brock, equal airtime to rebut allegations leveled at George Soros by believe it or not little ol me! All of this would be grounds for amusement if these "digital brownshirts" worked in a vacuum. But they do not. Thanks to George Soros, they enjoy an extra-constitutional power above and beyond their stature. For the first time in living memory, we are heading into an election where political speech will be monitored, curbed and potentially even prosecuted under federal law. Groups such as CAP and its offshoot Media Matters have thus gained the power to play informer, bringing to the authorities attention any political speech they find offensive, and which may prove punishable under the McCain-Feingold Act. In the third and final installment of this series, we will examine how George Soros succeeded, almost singlehandedly, in bringing to an end 228 years of free speech in these United States. Without shedding so much as a drop of American blood, Soros has managed to undo the work of Lexington and Concord. And few Americans even noticed.
============================================= Richard Poe is a New York Times-bestselling author and cyberjournalist. He is a contributing editor for NewsMax Magazine and NewsMax.com, and runs his own blog at RichardPoe.com. Poe's new book is Hillary's Secret War. His previous book, The Seven Myths of Gun Control, is now available in paperback.
|
Thanks Richard for this great 3 part series to wake up conservatives to the most dangerous man in the world for American, George $oreA$$.
You're welcome! Here's Part 3:
The Lies of George Soros (Part 3)
July 18, 2004HOW GEORGE SOROS singlehandedly gutted the First Amendment. More...
Oh boy.
I have reading to do.
I see I am also pinged to part 3.
I'll do my reading starting right now.
A rapid response alright!
I fear an electoral college "coo-de-tah" as Rep. Brown of Floriduh would say.
It's fascinating to listen for such agitprop from KCBS, an AM radio station here in the San Francisco Bay Area. I must admit: their news editor is a genius. He/she/it strings the stories together to foist an overall impression almost seamlessly. I would bet that there are meetings to get the reporters to ask the right questons to be more easily organized for effect. It doesn't take long for the other stations to have it down. One can flip channels and hear the stories almost in perfect sync.
I believe in economics the principle is called "market leadership."
bttt
What has been amazing to me is the rapid gloom and doom responses that the old embedded Digital Brownshirt Trolls put on any thread that is positive. They are often on the thread with a negative to GW and the thread before the 20th reply is registered.
However, this year the new or old recycled Digital Brownshirt Trolls often beat the embedden trolls in negative response time.
Makes one wonder if they have spotter trolls who monitor FR for any positive thread that is posted. Then the spotter Trolls notify the embedded Trolls and new Trolls about the thread.
They do the same when a negative thread to the rats is posted. Within minutes they are posting a disclaimer or challenging the post with some old mantra.
Says something about the power and reach of this Forum!
"Look for the leftists to skirt the CFR by fomenting direct action in order to create "news."
The LA Slimes, Gay Rhonicle and the other left wing canary bottom covers use their phony polls that way. They have a phoney poll and interview the people they want to interview to back up the poll.
Stern has just been apparently just been hired by a major tv net. So he can interview any lefty with a mantra against conservatives, republicans or GW and it will be news.
We will see billions of $'s of free air time for the liberals posing as news and news talk between now and November.
You nailed another reality: "It doesn't take long for the other stations to have it down. One can flip channels and hear the stories almost in perfect sync.'
In the fall and winter when I drive home from fishing in the evening, in a couple of hours I might get 3-5 stations as I go by one community to the next. It is amazing to hear the same lie over and over on from ABCBS and NBC and even some local stations.
Then the next morning I log on Free Republic and see that lie came from some major newspaper and immediately got spun over the radio as news.
By "direct action" I mean riots, terrorism, "disasters," that sort of thing.
I have no doubt that the eco/enviro terrorist fringe groups will commit acts of violence and terrorism this year.
Also, we see very creative ways by the lefty mediots to "bypass" the CFR on tv, radio and the internet.
You'll probably see terrorism in Europe with the blame coming here too.
What country in Europe do you will feel will the next "Spain" re violent terrorism?
My bet is France or Britain. Americans don't care enough about Germany either way to have that one really make it big in the news.
I'm sure that Brit intel has prevented more than one terrorist action in the UK.
They must be bussing them in from DU and other places .....
They're EVERYWHERE lately !
never heard of the Hillary/Kangas/Scaife connection (I was not much into politics at the time)
wow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.