Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weapons of Mass Distortion: A View of the Liberal Media
CBN News ^ | 7-16-04

Posted on 07/16/2004 9:37:15 PM PDT by hope

CBN.com  The Christian Broadcasting Network
|

(Current show is updated every weekday at 5pm EST.)

"There's a tremendous movement away, an exodus, from the mainstream press. Now, they're faced with a conundrum: "Do we continue going at business as usual, or do we acknowledge the reality that we've lost our audiences and try to regain them?" The evidence so far is they'd rather go down in flames."

-- Brent Bozell
author, "Weapons of Mass Distortion"

Please Read Related Article:

Shaping Truth the Liberal Media Way
Folks in the major news media swear that they are balanced and objective, but why do so many Americans say it feels like those media are working off a partisan agenda?


MEDIA
Weapons of Mass Distortion: A View of the Liberal Media

July 16, 2004


CBN.comBrent Bozell, a staunch right-wing conservative, is the nephew of columnist William F. Buckley and the son of L. Brent Bozell, Jr., who assisted Barry Goldwater with writing "Conscience of a Conservative." He is also founder and current president of the Media Research Center, the largest media watchdog organization in America. Established in 1987, the MRC has made "media bias" a household term, tracking it daily and printing the compiled evidence biweekly in its well-known "Notable Quotables." Bozell recently spoke with The 700 Club's Lee Webb concerning the liberal media and how they distort the truth.

LEE WEBB: Joining us now is Brent Bozell, founder of the Media Research Center, the leading media watchdog group in the country. And he's just written a book about media distortion and bias. The book is titled "Weapons of Mass Distortion: The Coming Meltdown of the Liberal Media." Brent, good to have you with us.

BRENT BOZELL: Hi, Lee. How are you doing?

WEBB: I want to ask you about - there's no question that there is a liberal bias in the media - but some in our audience would be pretty surprised to hear that there's a meltdown coming of the liberal media. What evidence do you have of that?

BOZELL: Well, I look at the trends, and I look at the numbers, and they're telling me that the media really are in trouble. Consider that since 1994, the big three broadcast networks have lost about 50 percent of their audiences. Consider that people are turning away from newspapers left and right. Consider that CNN, once the flagship of cable news, is in a complete free fall. Consider that if you want to find MSNBC on the ratings, you need a pretty good set of binoculars, they're so far down the path. And ask the media, "Why is it that everyone is leaving you?" Their answer is always, "Well, because there is too much competition out there," and they point to different news outlets, like talk radio and the Internet and what not. Now, if that were true, how does one explain Fox? How does one explain the fact that while everyone is dropping, Fox has been climbing like a meteor in the last five years. It's all alone in first place. It's not competition, or, in fact, just competition; it's a different sort of competition. If Fox were just like CBS, Fox wouldn't have lasted for five minutes. Fox is doing what it's doing because it's different. The same thing holds true for talk radio. The same thing holds true for the Internet. There's a tremendous movement away, an exodus, from the mainstream press. Now, they're faced with a conundrum: "Do we continue going at business as usual, or do we acknowledge the reality that we've lost our audiences and try to regain them?" The evidence so far is they'd rather go down in flames.

WEBB: I want to get just some examples from you on media bias as we head to the November election. But before, I wanted to read to our viewers, one, that you point out in your book, about something that Brian Williams said after a debate in 2000. I've always kind of looked at Brian as a likable, even-handed sort of fellow, but here's what he said in a post-debate coverage: noted that the Republicans were "rather strident tonight. Anti-gay, pro-Jesus and anti-abortion, and no gray matter in between." That's pretty outrageous, isn't it?

BOZELL: Yes. Yes. As I point out in the book, he may have meant gray "area." Gray matter is a personal slap at conservatives. I don't think he meant it, but there's the attitude that you have. Isn't it interesting that on the social issues, conservatives are always portrayed as being the controversial ones? We're the extremists. Abortion is a classic example. And in the book, as I point out, with abortion, all you have to look at is the polling data. Don't take my word for it. Take Faye Wattleton of NARAL's word for it. A majority of the American people today call themselves pro-life. Overwhelmingly they're opposed to the pro-abortion agenda of federal funding, of non-parental notification, of partial birth abortion. Those are far-Left extremist positions, and yet the media consistently portray them as mainstream, just as they're doing with the gay movement.

WEBB: Do you think those who are going to vote against the Federal Marriage Amendment in the Senate have a willing ally in the liberal media?

BOZELL: Oh, yes. I was watching this weekend, or listening on the radio, to ABC News, and it just struck me that every report is the same. Whenever there's a development on that front, it is always a positive, exciting new development for the gay movement that they get to marry. There's energy behind the news. And then there is the, "Well, there go those Christians again." There's that dour part that comes in at the end of the show, with some very disgruntled Christian complaining about it.

WEBB: Brent, I want to ask you about the foundational element of all of this, and that's journalism schools. It was drilled into me when I was going through college, objectivity, objectivity, objectivity. Do you think we just need to get away from that whole notion that you can be objective when you're reporting on a story, and get to the issue of being fair?

BOZELL: See, objectivity is a myth. It never did exist, never will exist. It can't exist. Human nature being what it is, we're all opinionated to one degree or another. Everything in the news media is subjective. It begins with, on The 700 Club, why did you choose the stories you chose to cover today? Subjective decision. Who did you put on? Subjective decision. How much time did you give both sides? Subjective decision. Everything in the news media is subjective to one degree or another. People who say they're objective are perpetuating a myth. And what do you do? You ought to be striving for truth. You ought to be striving for that holy grail of objectivity. But to do that, you've got to incorporate balance, you've got to recognize what your own personal biases are, and you've got to seek the other voices on the other side. Some people, Fox, does a very good job of that. I don't think that ABC gives a hoot and a holler about that on coverage on things like the war. They just don't want to be evenhanded. And where economics is concerned, no matter what truth is, the economy is going very well. How many people have you seen recently report that the economy today is doing better than it was this time four years ago, under Bill Clinton?

WEBB: Well, Brent, it's a fascinating read. The title of the book, "Weapons of Mass Distortion: The Coming Meltdown of the Liberal Media." If you're interested in buying Brent's book, it's available on our website at CBN.com. Brent, again, great to have you with us.

BOZELL: Thank you, Lee. My pleasure.

The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. © 2004

 


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: booktour; brentbozell; cbn; liberalmedia; massdistortion; mediabias; mrc

1 posted on 07/16/2004 9:37:16 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: nutmeg

read later bump


3 posted on 07/16/2004 9:43:09 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

Good post. Thanks.


4 posted on 07/16/2004 10:09:02 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

bump


5 posted on 07/17/2004 12:26:10 AM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

Yet more reason for optimism. I hope the whole lot of them die bitter, depressed, and friendless. And broke. Jane Fonda, and her boy Kerry, too.


6 posted on 07/17/2004 1:03:56 AM PDT by Iris7 ("Democracy" assumes every opinion is equally valid. No one believes this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
I long ago cancelled my subscriptions to the local fish-wrapper and to the national weeklies. I subscribe to National Review, Chronicles, and the New Criterion, and I get my daily news from Drudge, Free Republic, and a few newspapers on the internet. (e.g. London Telegraph.) I watch Britt Hume and occasionally O'Reilly, and that's it.
7 posted on 07/17/2004 4:22:39 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
There's a tremendous movement away, an exodus, from the mainstream press

Music to my ears! Let it be so!

8 posted on 07/17/2004 4:39:43 AM PDT by twntaipan (demoncRATs ARE the friends of our enemies, which makes democRATs our... (finish the sentence).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan

Go Brent.....


9 posted on 07/17/2004 4:48:48 AM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hope
All,

I have just finished reading Brent Bozell's new book. I frankly was a bit disappointed.

Yes, the book is well written and engaging. And it amply documents the problem. But it doesn't spend much time talking about how the "mainstream" media is going to collapse.

Besides, I already knew most of the things documented in the book. So I didn't learn much. One exception to this was the story of how then Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris told the Media one week before the election to be careful about calling Florida before the folks in the panhandle voted. As most Freepers already know, this move cost Bush thousands of votes.

But this book could be useful for figuratively (or literally if you get violent) beating Liberals or clueless Moderates over the head when discussing Media Bias.

Actually, this book shows that bias isn't the real problem. It is the active collusion of news media folks with partisan causes.

10 posted on 07/17/2004 6:32:10 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan

TV News losing viewers? Lower ratings? YESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!! TV News does "programming", all right. They propagandize and sensationalize the news to get ratings and fit THEIR agenda ONLY. If a story ever breaks out that doesn't dovetail into their goal of brainwashing the incompetent, inferior "unwashed" of America, they simply ignore it as long as they can or do their best to downplay it. Classic example: the "news stories" about Clintler's approval ratings during impeachment. Nothing about impeachment, everything about how Everybody Loves Bill.
I hope ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN have ratings that go so low they have to find them with post hole diggers. They've been doing a disservice to this republic for years.


11 posted on 07/17/2004 8:05:21 AM PDT by Springfield45 (Bush WON, Democrats. Now YOU get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hope

If the liberal (mainstream) media collapses, the democrats will have to collapse too. Wow! There'll be no filibusters of judicial candidates, the Supreme Court will have a majority of young strict constructionists, there will be enough Republicans in both houses to send a Contitutional ammendment to the State Legislatures, and the President will have much less interference dealing with enemies foreign.

Hope so!


12 posted on 07/17/2004 5:00:17 PM PDT by c-five
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru
Actually, this book shows that bias isn't the real problem. It is the active collusion of news media folks with partisan causes.

Bingo! Media collusion, media fraud, media hoaxes. And I'm tired of the phrase "liberal bias." These people aren't liberals, they're socialists and communists. The coming election will be a referendum on the media more than it will be one on the respective candidates.

13 posted on 07/17/2004 8:10:51 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson