Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible Quantum Stumbling Block Found For Nanotechnologies
AZoNano ^ | 7/11/04

Posted on 07/11/2004 6:29:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker

The rage to exploit all things quantum may have hit a snag. Quantum nanorods, atomic structures that have been heralded as the key to everything from super-efficient solar cells to an elusive white laser, appear to have an inherent surface charge that may tarnish their gleaming image, according to a report by University of Rochester scientists in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

“This is not a positive nano-tech revelation,” says Todd Krauss, assistant professor of chemistry and principal author of the research. “We’ve found that while perfect nanorods have all this wonderful potential, in reality the current manufacturing process has a serious flaw that gives the rods a charge, and it is this charge that we expect will seriously degrade their usefulness.”

Quantum rods are lengths of latticed atoms of cadmium and selenium that ought to have no overall charge, but Krauss has discovered that while textbook physics says rods should not have a permanent surface charge, in reality they do. He thinks he’s figured out why.

Ideally, quantum nanorods would be constructed of identical layers of bonded atoms. In reality, however, the lattice of cadmium and selenium is skewed, and this imperfect fabrication process creates slightly varied layers that build up to create large disturbances in the overall surface charge profile. Imagine a stack of books where one in the middle is not placed exactly on the one below it; its spine protrudes out one side and its leafed side is sunken into the stack on the other. The overhang allows some of the cover of the book to be visible; in the quantum rod, that visible part of the layer is made of charge-carrying atoms, and their charge disrupts the overall surface charge neutrality of the rod. Improperly stack enough layers in the rod and an appreciable surface charge builds up.

The problem of skewed layers is likely an artifact of the fabrication process, says Krauss. The rods are created in a highly controlled molecular bath where the correct atoms naturally bond in the correct areas. During the rod synthesis, however, many growing rods stick together, creating warps and skewing that only get more uneven as the fabrication continues. Even though the rods are nominally cylindrical, under intense magnification Krauss was able to show that they’re more like tree limbs with knots, bumps, and bends.

“The problem with using these for solar panels or other devices is that they’re charged particles, and that means they’re going to interact,” says Krauss. “For example, making liquid crystals out of quantum rods means thinking about how they aren’t simple neutral particles anymore. Companies are spending millions to design solar cells out of these things, but charged solar cell elements are potentially problematic since they attract the very electron you’re trying to harvest. It’s a really important issue that will have to be addressed before quantum rods reach their full potential for devices of this sort.”

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, and the New York State Office of Science, Technology, and Academic Research. Working with Krauss were doctoral students Rishikesh Krishnan and Megan Hahn from the University of Rochester, and John Silcox, professor of engineering at Cornell University, with his doctoral student Zhiheng Yu.

http://www.rochester.edu


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: block; nanotech; nanotechnology; quantum; science; stumbling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Just a blip on the road to our nanotech future.
1 posted on 07/11/2004 6:29:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I can't stand an imperfect nanorod.


2 posted on 07/11/2004 6:32:10 PM PDT by TommyDale ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; Free the USA

ping


3 posted on 07/11/2004 6:34:09 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Now we need a nanohammer to pound the atoms back into alignment.

So9

4 posted on 07/11/2004 6:38:28 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (We're really just harmless country clubbers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Most guys with perfect nanorods can't stand them either.


5 posted on 07/11/2004 6:40:48 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It's that damn George W. Bush again, I'm sure of it.


6 posted on 07/11/2004 6:43:42 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Now we need a nanohammer to pound the atoms back into alignment.

And a little baling wire.

7 posted on 07/11/2004 6:47:31 PM PDT by harrowup (Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
..Now we need a nanohammer to pound the atoms back into alignment.

Darn!...Where did I put that nanohammer?...Must next to the Sinclair Molecular Chain. :/

8 posted on 07/11/2004 6:48:27 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harrowup

And, of course, a little nanoduct tape.


9 posted on 07/11/2004 6:52:32 PM PDT by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aarchaeus

Nano, nano...

10 posted on 07/11/2004 6:54:07 PM PDT by mikrofon (Flush the Johns in every state this November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

Exactly. Beat to fit; paint to match.


11 posted on 07/11/2004 6:54:47 PM PDT by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I knew it.


12 posted on 07/11/2004 6:56:24 PM PDT by Capitalism2003 (America is too great for small dreams. - Ronald Reagan, speech to Congress. January 1, 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; oldglory; MinuteGal; gonzo; Luke FReeman; sheikdetailfeather
"Most guys with perfect nanorods can't stand them either."

Well, I've heard that those who accidently happen to snag their nanorods and cause them to become tarnished, can barely stand that either. You can just imagine how that must smart!

13 posted on 07/11/2004 6:56:27 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

What kind of nimrod would use a nanohammer on a nanorod?

Everyone knows you have to use a nanospanner...


14 posted on 07/11/2004 6:57:00 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aarchaeus; skinkinthegrass
...nanoduct tape

You youngsters have no respect for bubble gum and wire...held many a muffler on till payday.

...the Sinclair Molecular Chain.

You don't happen to have an extra one around do you? [:>)

Seriously though, this is exciting news to identify the drag...damn; this world is just going to be incredible with unlimited power and opportunity.

15 posted on 07/11/2004 7:09:48 PM PDT by harrowup (Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Just a blip on the road to our nanotech future.

If, as the article seems to indicate, this is primarily a problem with the manufacturing process, well that's something we Americans are great at overcoming. Then the europeans and chinese steal the new processes...

16 posted on 07/11/2004 7:16:57 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Can't they just fill the rough nanoedges with nanobondo?


17 posted on 07/11/2004 7:22:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
Just released on the AP wire..." there have been 6 X 10 23 atoms out of line since George Bush declared an end to hostilities on May 1st.
18 posted on 07/11/2004 7:54:26 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
On the plus side, we won't have to worry about "grey goo", predicted by former Sun Microsystems chief technology officer Bill Joy. This is the notion that microscopic self-replicating machines will get loose and destroy the world.

Joy figured we have about 30 years until humans are obsolete, since computing power increases by a factor of two every 18 months (Moore's Law); in 30 years, that's a million-fold increase in power, believed to be similar to the power of a human brain.

19 posted on 07/11/2004 7:56:43 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I think that many current approaches to nanotechnology are wrong-headed. The goal seems to be to make little machines with little parts that are in all ways analogous to the big machines and big parts we use in the macroscopic realm.

The really effective nanotechnologies are going to be those that exploit the quantum effects that today's designers seek to avoid.

20 posted on 07/11/2004 7:58:01 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson