This visit was criticised, but on the flip side, there has been a great deal of education going on about what the Islamists believe, as you can see.
Regards, Ivan
This visit was criticised, but on the flip side, there has been a great deal of education going on about what the Islamists believe, as you can see.
Regards, Ivan
Religion of Peace ping.
Actually, since polygamy means that most Muslim men cannot ever expect to marry (hence their fondness for young boys and each other), rape should be considered a normal by-product of Muslim culture.
The extreme Islamists disdain modern life as much as they disdain humam life. If a woman dresses in provocative clothing, she asks to be raped. Gee, now where did we hear that one before?
And you're right, Ivan, this was a good visit. This stuff is the Islamo-fascists' vision for the world.
On a related note.
"Imam gives underling permission to beat his wife"
http://www.thedailystar.net/2004/07/10/d40710011313.htm
Yet Mohammedanism is "chic" among leftists...
Why was this monster even given a visa to enter England?
The First Amendment for American citizens is one thing, but tell me just WHY we allow people like this into our country since nothing says we have to??????
Last vote for the Republicrats will be in Nov 2004. Const Party thereafter.
This guy must be a hit in Paris...
Something really weird happened to me that this reminds me of. I attended a 'talk' that was supposed to be between a Pastor friend of mine and a group of Muslims. (This was pre-9/11. I've learned a lot since).
The Muslim guys up front did all the talking and didn't allow the Pastor much time. Maybe he got 10% of the total time up there. There were 7 of us Christians and 100 or so Muslims.
At the end of the ordeal, a Muslim convert (Fat American kid wearing a skull cap) was particularly interested in arguing the case for Islam with me against Christianity. (He was one of many, they all ganged up). But his particular beef with me was "that passage in Deuteronomy" that said that if a woman didn't cry out during a rape that she would be put to death. He distorted the Old Testament passage which basically said that the woman needed to protest or else it would be considered consensual. (I didn't have my Bible with me (ugh) and was not very familiar with that Old Testament law so I didn't refute him on that particular issue. I didn't agree with him, either).
But it was very strange that he would pick that topic to try to convince me that Christianity was inferior to Islam.
(By the way, here's the passage:
If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death-the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man's wife. You must purge the evil from among you.
But if out in the country a man happens to meet a girl pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die. Do nothing to the girl; she has committed no sin deserving death. This case is like that of someone who attacks and murders his neighbor, for the man found the girl out in the country, and though the betrothed girl screamed, there was no one to rescue her).
These guys are playing word games. The woman was raped; the rapist should be punished.
Yup, very convenient for the Islamic male. Sort of getting, eating and keeping their cake all at the same time.
Prairie
In Dr. al-Qaradawi's eyes, Bill Clinton raping Juanita Brodderick was Juanita Broddericks fault.
Well, now Brits can't say they weren't warned about the nature of the beast. These people are nuts. Well, you all know the drill. Islam has lobotomized Arabs. This is why no civil rights, no modern life, culture, knowledge, learning, literacy. PC thinking isn't going to protect Britain, far from it.
ON THE NET...
ISLAM ONLINE.net -- "Ask The Scholar"
http://www.islamonline.net/fatwaapplication/english/browse.asp
ISLAM ONLINE.net -- "Live Fatwa" (Archives)
http://www.islamonline.net/livefatwa/english/oldresult.asp
Is it the argument, in this case, that it is OK for girls to barely dress themselves and make all types of innuendos and half promises to young guys? And if they get raped, as a consequence, they do not bear even the slightest share of the blame?
The liberal feminazis are suffering from the chronic, "public swimming pool mentality"; (rather than telling parents it is their duty and responsibility to teach their kids to swim, activists just demand that more life guards should be added to "keep the kids safe" after a tragedy).
This liberal group-think thing is so easy to get sucked into. The feminests loudly proclaim, "But it wasn't her fault, because no matter what she said or did, she should never be attacked."
Unfortunately, these days, this is the blank check that America's young girls are being offered. The pro-sex crowd is lying to our kids by telling them that they may taunt and tease and that they will be safe, because any one who responds aggressively will be punished.
These liberal spokespeople, including lesbian Lynne Harne, are failing to mention to the girls that tempting teenage and college-age boys is like playing Russian Roulette with a loaded gun.
In other words, no matter how wrong rape is, girls who dress and act like sluts are still taking a very big risk when they flaunt and taunt.
This has absolutely nothing to do with Islam being flawed, either. Modesty is based on simple common sense.
says that women can be guilty of provoking a sexual attack if their dress or behaviour arouses a man.
That's probably true. ;D