Posted on 07/10/2004 4:06:59 PM PDT by doug from upland
This thing stank of a cover up from the start, from the original WTC bombing onward the bent one covered up everything to avoid doing anything.
That would be Webb Hubbell, No. 3 man at the Justice Department under Reno and Chelsea's father (IMHO).
After being forced to resign from DOJ, he was the recipient of $700,000 in "legal work" from Clintonistas.
Maybe because, for example, in the year of 9/11, the CIA had a small number of officers studying Arabic but devoted 20,000 manhours to "sensitivity training?"
There is no basis to suggest we live in a constitutional republic. The Constitution serves only to legitimize the government to the people, it does little to constrain the government.
The government is 100% under the control of 2 political crime syndicates. These crime syndicates are privately funded. They have a tightly controlled internal leadership structure. They have the largest, and most sophisticated propaganda machine ever seen by man. They are the only organizations which can legally broadcast falsehoods.
These privately-controlled organizations create 100% of all new laws.
They alone choose judges to serve their interests in the government courts.
They alone choose, and/or approve, candidates who will represent their interests at local, state and federal levels.
Attempts to create alternate syndicates are met with extreme hostility.
Attempts to apply Constitutional law against these syndicates are met with extreme hostility. Should such legal "attacks" against them be successful they then revise the laws to accommodate the interests of their power monopoly.
Both syndicates are competitive, but neither syndicate will ever do anything that would seriously jeopardize the public confidence in the other.
They need each other to present the image of a freely competitive political system. This is a carefully cultivated and protected false image. Anything that may arise that could seriously damage the legitimacy of either organization will be controlled at all costs by the other competitive syndicate. This includes matters of vote fraud, Presidential impeachment, influence of foreign powers, treason, bribery, murder, theft, and more. Much of the misbehavior is protected as a special class laws which exclude the elite from prosecution, though the average citizen can be prosecuted for the exact same behavior.
This is an oligarchy, not a constitutional republic.
Sad to say, I no longer trust this government. Specter is a liar and a fraud, and proved that with his non-legal 'vote' at clinton's impeachment trial. With friends like him we need no other enemies. I wish Jayna all the luck in the world; she needs it to get this resolved -- but this government will do all it can to close her out.
A mother holding her baby in the door of her home, a cabin.. er, I mean a heavily fortified compound, was dead. In 1992 few knew and the many didn't care to know. Then it got worse.
As one writer put it after Ruby Ridge and Waco, "It was perfectly clear that there was not the slightest intention anywhere of imposing any accountability or consequences. There was little examination or confrontation . . There weren't streams of people on Ted Koppel's Nightline debating the constitutionality or morality. There were no dramatic angry voices in the Alan Dershowitz mode. . .The prevailing attitude was the same as Clinton's attitude after his rape of Juanita Broaddrick, in which he laughed and told her to put some ice on it while gloating over the fact she was helpless to do anything about it."
Some (most?) truth did come out. It took years. I cannot find a concise history of what brought it out and forced Congressmen to do a real investigation. Some of that is found here however (very long page)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b2433ca39d0.htm
I do remember local talk radio in northern California. I remember one national talk radio show, Art Bell's. Talk radio was where citizens would not let their government tell them to "put some ice on it." I believe I remember some Compuserve discussion, also. Plus, limited circulation print, Maybe one was Media Bypass.
Today we have so much more. OKC is just a question of time.
AAAGHH!!! MyEYES!!!!
Bump for later reading.
But why would our government want to cover-up the truth of Oklahoma City? That's what I'd like to know. Why would finding out that more people than McVeigh and Nichols being involved hurt the administration?
You may have answered my previous question.
bump
Maybe it is those within the FBI who engaged in the initial coverup who are the ones continuing this one. If the one killer was executed, the other convicted, and the courts have determined those two were the only ones involved, what does the president do about it? We have to raise enough of a stink to pressure the administration to look into this. Justice has not been done.
bump for reference
Foreign policy would be affected if the collaborators were foreign nationals. In the case of Oklahoma City, the collaborators were here as a result of Iraqis brought back from Iraq in the Desert Storm ending. They were held in refugee status so long they revolted and tried to burn up Camp Chaffee in Arkansas where they were held. This showed the bitterness most of them held. Part were established in Oklahoma City and the remainder were taken to Lincoln, Nebraska after the riots. Either the Bush one administration or Clinton administration would be embarassed by their origin being known.
read later
I'm about halfway through The Third Terrorist...now THIS would make a good movie/documentary!!!!!!
I predict that this will make it to the big screen.
OMG...Let's pray that it's not a Michael Moore production!!
How about Mel Gibson as producer???
Who would play the part of Jayna...what's the gals name that plays the lead in Everybody Loves Raymond...Patricia ??? She's a good conservative, has she done any dramas???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.