Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meenie

But why would our government want to cover-up the truth of Oklahoma City? That's what I'd like to know. Why would finding out that more people than McVeigh and Nichols being involved hurt the administration?


28 posted on 07/10/2004 11:20:38 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: 3catsanadog

Maybe it is those within the FBI who engaged in the initial coverup who are the ones continuing this one. If the one killer was executed, the other convicted, and the courts have determined those two were the only ones involved, what does the president do about it? We have to raise enough of a stink to pressure the administration to look into this. Justice has not been done.


31 posted on 07/11/2004 12:25:22 AM PDT by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: 3catsanadog

Foreign policy would be affected if the collaborators were foreign nationals. In the case of Oklahoma City, the collaborators were here as a result of Iraqis brought back from Iraq in the Desert Storm ending. They were held in refugee status so long they revolted and tried to burn up Camp Chaffee in Arkansas where they were held. This showed the bitterness most of them held. Part were established in Oklahoma City and the remainder were taken to Lincoln, Nebraska after the riots. Either the Bush one administration or Clinton administration would be embarassed by their origin being known.


33 posted on 07/11/2004 6:26:26 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson