Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2004 4:57:05 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: 7.62 x 51mm

I believe this is old news. Impossible to verify. Praying that it is untrue.


2 posted on 06/30/2004 5:00:37 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

Bunk!


3 posted on 06/30/2004 5:01:40 AM PDT by jbstrick (War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
interview of Paul L. Williams, author of his new book, "Osama's Revenge: The Next 9-11", who said there are already 20-40 tactical (10 kiloton) nukes in the US, in major cities.

Yet, another kookconian with SURPRISE!! a new book to sell.

4 posted on 06/30/2004 5:02:17 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

More propoganda designed to make it look like Bush isn't doing his job.


5 posted on 06/30/2004 5:02:20 AM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (Democrats aren't playing with a full deck, they only use the race cards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

If the terrorists had a nuke in the US, we'd know it. They would have blown it off by now.


6 posted on 06/30/2004 5:03:00 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

I can concieve of a couple or few being here, but 20-40 is testing the odds of being caught.

Then again, if suitcase nukes were ever discovered in the US, we'd never hear about it.


7 posted on 06/30/2004 5:03:23 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
How much damage would 20 tactical nukes do? I suspect millions of dead. I suspect a collapsed economy. I suspect a total re-thinking of our Middle East policy. I suspect permanent disfavor for George W. Bush.

Given that, how come the nukes haven't gone off?

Cause they aren't here.

8 posted on 06/30/2004 5:04:01 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
.....we have a major headache brewing.

LOL! You win for the understatement of the decade.

9 posted on 06/30/2004 5:04:49 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

It is a simple spelling mistake. Tactical Nooks is what it is supposed to say.

Fergitaboudit


10 posted on 06/30/2004 5:05:19 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Drove my Jaguar to the Quagmire. But the Quagmire was dry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Quite honestly, I would doubt the report - the bad guys would find it impossible not to use one of the devices.

That being said, we can read in the newspaper that lots of stuff gets smuggled in to our country. Could a nuke be brought in? Yes.

12 posted on 06/30/2004 5:06:06 AM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

This story keeps getting repeated over and over, but with an ever-increasing number of weapons.

If they haven't gone off by now, they aren't going to detonate at all.


14 posted on 06/30/2004 5:07:50 AM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

BS, they would have been used the instant they got there.


17 posted on 06/30/2004 5:10:10 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

Is Richard Clark's hair on fire yet?


18 posted on 06/30/2004 5:11:29 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Our Troops swear to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, LOOKOUT DEMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

Linda Vester interviewed him a couple of days ago.

He also said al-Qaeda already has some 5,000 operatives in sleeper cells inside the US.

He could be just hawking his book. However, if his is correct, the next 9-11 could be very disasterous.

We can only hope our HS/FBI/CIA operate on much better information than we know.




FoxNews just said that travelers should look out for persons of Pakistani origin who may have bruises and fleshwounds that might have resulted from para-military training.


19 posted on 06/30/2004 5:12:37 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
, but I have 4 landscape crews to brief and get moving, plus the retail garden center staff to get started-up and moving by 7am.

My area should be out of range of the actual blast, but downwind. I am looking for a low flowering shrub that can take radioactive fallout. Any suggestions?

20 posted on 06/30/2004 5:14:03 AM PDT by myprecious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
This FR post showed up last evening. Curious, isn't it, that Iowa would be looking for illegal radioactive materials.


Iowa to check for radioactive cargo
      Posted by FairOpinion
On News/Activism 06/29/2004 11:38:23 PM CDT with 16 comments


Omaha World Herald ^ | June 29, 2004 | AP
DES MOINES (AP) - Drive-through radiation detection equipment will be installed at five weigh stations on Interstates 35 and 80 later this year to look for radioactive cargo in heavy trucks. State officials told the Des Moines Register that Iowa will become one of the first states in the country to routinely check trucks for the illegal cargo, as part of an effort to stop terrorists from smuggling bomb-making materials or stolen nuclear weapons. "You are going to see a lot more of this. It is part of the new landscape," said Jack Legler, vice president of the American Trucking...
 

26 posted on 06/30/2004 5:17:19 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

I'll consult my contacts on Gamma-Nu Epsilon 5 as soon as my hyrogen powered extra telepathic nikon brain flash freezes up.


29 posted on 06/30/2004 5:17:46 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Vote Kerry if you want to commit national suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
The Police have been stopping people who were injected with radioactive isotopes because they are using radiation detectors, particularly in major cities. If they have any in the United States, I doubt they are positioned in major cities and I'm inclined to believe that they'd have been used already.
33 posted on 06/30/2004 5:18:58 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

These reports have been out ever since 9-11, but not as well reported as Brokaw's insistence that there is no WMD or linkage between Iraq and 9-11.

The threat isn't as significant for a handful or even 40 nukes being depolyed by surprise, as was the intel reports of Iraq constructing, fabricating and deploying a partitioned assembly line to produce such devices with the assembly line mounted on tractor-trailer rigs. This was considered the real threat and even if discovered as evidence of WMD, I don't know of any intel community or national level authority who would be stupid enough to release the proof publicly.

These reports were in the press and international political reporting scene between 1990 and 2000. Prior to 1994, British private press reports indicated Iran had purchased nukes from a fallen USSR, explicitly with the purpose of hitting any US task force north of the Straits of Hormutz and nothing happened later when US Amphibious Task Forces floated off shore during Gulf War I.

On the good news side,...it generally takes substantial industrial hi-tech, maintenance capacity, to maintain such devices in an operable condition. They deteriorate with time. So even if they are provided to a terrorist, unless they are immediately detonated, they become less dangerous as a nuclear blast hazard, than as a local radioactive risk. Additionally, whoever becomes then associated with such a device, has simply committed themselves to being easily identified,...the clandestine nature of the delivery which is the terrorist's major advantage,...as soon as that is lost, he's impotent because he is no longer creating terror, merely a known proponent of evil targetable as an enemy by everybody.

Perhaps the best tactic is simply to accept that we are going to get hit by 40 suitcase nukes and have that threat accepted in the public mind. That way if we get hit, by several over a delayed period of time with threatening communicatos, terror isn't promoted. Instead, a reasoned response to the real threat will help guide our thinking, decisions, and actions appropriately.

It needs to be emphasized that the tactics of terror are promoted by those who advocate revolution, communism, and later socialism. Wherever we observe terrorism, be on the lookout for the machinations of socialists being placed into action to advance their agenda.


47 posted on 06/30/2004 5:26:01 AM PDT by Cvengr (;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

bump


49 posted on 06/30/2004 5:27:19 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson