Skip to comments.
Rush Says 9/11 Commission Member DID Find Iraq/AQ Connections
June 16, 2004
| Vanity
Posted on 06/17/2004 9:13:56 AM PDT by Peach
Rush just said that one of the 9/11 Commission Hearing members has written the media complaining that they have taken ONE line out of context.
They HAVE found Iraq/AQ connections, but haven't found that Iraq was involved in 9/11. Even though they were't charged WITH even looking at that.
And Bush has never claimed that Iraq was behind 9/11.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; alqaeda; alqaedaandiraq; iraq; limbaugh; rush; rushlimbaugh; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: mathluv
41
posted on
06/17/2004 9:51:01 AM PDT
by
mathluv
(Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
To: Peach
(we could be in for some rough times here if all parties are in agreement - something like a planetary alignment and high tides).
Several months ago in a thread about Kerry, I posted that he wouldn't do much about terrorism and we've be fighting terrorists in places like Denver, Cleveland, etc. Then a couple of days ago, that terrorist-wannabe was caught and his intention was to blow up a mall in Columbus. OK, so I missed it by 124 miles.
42
posted on
06/17/2004 9:52:51 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: TomGuy
Close enough for government work, Tom!
43
posted on
06/17/2004 9:53:24 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: sheltonmac
As much as I despise the media, they certainly don't have a monopoly on spin. The administration clearly shifted its focus from "WMD" to "evidence of WMD programs." Employing that kind of tactic in order to reinforce one's argument is not unique. Whtaever, a simple question to you, though.
Is the world better off with saddam in power or not?
JMO, with reading your previous posts, you would be in the camp of saying that the would be better with saddam in power, kinda of like the liberal media.
44
posted on
06/17/2004 9:53:56 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: All
Excellent point, we should be countering the hell out of this crap. This site has done several threads on mock planes in Iraq used to train terrorists for 911, how come that point never comes up?
45
posted on
06/17/2004 9:54:04 AM PDT
by
keysguy
(Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
To: Mo1
I was working in the courthouse during the time Hannity was on so I don't know. What did he say?
46
posted on
06/17/2004 9:54:46 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(Entrenched DemocRAT union-backed bureaucrats quietly sabotage President Bush every day.)
To: Peach
47
posted on
06/17/2004 9:55:13 AM PDT
by
malia
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: RoseofTexas
Something went awry with these hearings. I wonder if it could be Hillary's F.B.I. files or something like that I don't know how else to explain the incompetence on our side.
48
posted on
06/17/2004 9:56:02 AM PDT
by
keysguy
(Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
To: TomGuy
Several months ago in a thread about Kerry, I posted that he wouldn't do much about terrorism and we've be fighting terrorists in places like Denver, Cleveland, etc. Then a couple of days ago, that terrorist-wannabe was caught and his intention was to blow up a mall in Columbus. OK, so I missed it by 124 miles Well since Denver is in CO, and Columbus(the place of the intended al-queda attack) is in OH.
I would say that you are about 1,000 miles off in your prediction in both directions(i.e. Denver, CO, and Columbus, OH) which are far, far, away from Columbus, OK(if there is such a place in OK).
49
posted on
06/17/2004 9:59:03 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Matchett-PI
I think it was said on his TV show .. but I could be wrong and something about Kennedy and the dems gearing up for an impeachment of Bush
I was hoping maybe someone else also heard it and could fill in the blanks for me
50
posted on
06/17/2004 10:02:22 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
To: Dane
Is the world better off with saddam in power or not?
Why are you asking me, a guy living thousands of miles away in the Midwestern United States? You should ask those directly affected. The answer, however, may depend upon whom you ask. Radical Muslim extremists drooling over the prospect of seizing power in Iraq probably think they're better off without Saddam than the Christians now facing persecution.
51
posted on
06/17/2004 10:03:12 AM PDT
by
sheltonmac
("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
To: Peach
Saying Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 is like saying Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11... although technically true, the fact that they provided support makes them guilty.
52
posted on
06/17/2004 10:03:34 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
53
posted on
06/17/2004 10:03:34 AM PDT
by
Lyford
To: Dane
No fair. I didn't punctuate my original comment that way.
A period is a period. A comma is a comma. You switched MY punctuation to make YOUR point.
It is 'Columbus [period] [space] word=OK [comma]...
54
posted on
06/17/2004 10:03:46 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: Peach
55
posted on
06/17/2004 10:04:33 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
To: Peach
Well .. I have a great photo of a painting which our soldiers found in Iraq.
It shows a portrait of Saddam and next to it is a rendering of airplanes flying into the WTC.
Now .. can somebody explain to me why the leader of a country would have such a painting done IF THAT LEADER WAS NOT INVOLVED IN OR ASSISTED IN THE ATTACK. I mean .. Saddam supposedly thought he had a part in the attack.
56
posted on
06/17/2004 10:06:51 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: a core set of principles from which he will not deviate)
To: CyberAnt
Saddam knew 9/11 was coming (you've seen me post the links over and over).
The Clinton admin. Justice Department got an indictment in federal court in 1998 against OBL saying OBL had links with Saddam.
It's so funny to watch the leftists deny that which they used to know.
57
posted on
06/17/2004 10:10:42 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: TomGuy
It is 'Columbus [period] [space] word=OK [comma]. Nope, OK is an abbrv. for the state of Oklahoma.
Lower case "ok" meaning everything is "ok"(i.e a hand gesture with the index finger meeting the thumb making a letter "o" with the other three fingers on a normal human hand standing).
58
posted on
06/17/2004 10:10:47 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Peach
I heard a former top CIA agent (I think his name is Waugh) say that it's ludicrous to think that plots at this level have memos written.
Even the Arab terrorists are not stupid enough to leave a trail like that.
59
posted on
06/17/2004 10:11:01 AM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obfuscation)
To: Peach
BTW - this former agent (Waugh) said he had personal knowledge of the 9/11 Iraqi connection from former undercover ops. He was interviewed on MSNBC or FOX recently.
60
posted on
06/17/2004 10:13:29 AM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obfuscation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson