Rush Says 9/11 Commission Member DID Find Iraq/AQ Connections

June 16, 2004 | Vanity

[Peach]

Rush just said that one of the 9/11 Commission Hearing members has written the media complaining that they have taken ONE line out of context.

They HAVE found Iraq/AQ connections, but haven't found that Iraq was involved in 9/11. Even though they were't charged WITH even looking at that.

And Bush has never claimed that Iraq was behind 9/11.

[Mo1]

"I suspect the DemocRATS are laying the groundwork with this Iraqi prison scandal to try and start impeachment proceedings against Bush when he is re-elected.

Didn't Hannity mentioned yesterday that Fat Teddy Kennedy was gearing up for that?

[OXENinFLA]

THANKS




MUST READ PING!!!!!!

[OldFriend]

Baghdad Bob is the main source of information for the 9/11 Circus!

[mathluv]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1155228/posts
Bush Insists on Saddam Relationship with Al-Qaeda
Reuters ^ | 6/17/04

[Mo1]

That the Republicans are not out there COUNTERING these lies ticks me off to no end

Give the left enough rope .. they'll hang themselves

In the mean time .. just watch and then bury them with thier lies

[demlosers]

Liberals Want Rumsfeld to Boot Limbaugh Off Armed Forces Radio

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1143061/posts

[Peach]

I'm so glad Bush isn't backing away from the TRUTH!

[TheMightyQuinn]

Precisely.

Just as it changed from "no WMDs in Iraq" to "no stockpile of WMDs in Iraq"

[RoseofTexas]

That the Republicans are not out there COUNTERING these lies ticks me off to no end.


If that TICKS you off, I am PISSED as well! KNOWING that we have the majority, WHO THE HELL IS RUNNING THIS HEARING? I thought, surely with the pubs have the upper hand we would've had honest fair people in the panel...BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO the frickin pubs always want to play fair! WHICH part of YOU JUST GOT BURNED AGAIN STUPID don't they understand! The evil RATS play to win, the pubs play to appease the bastards...ENUFF!!!!!!! The pubs just got their behinds handed to them in a silver platter! UGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

[dirtboy]

That the Republicans are not out there COUNTERING these lies ticks me off to no end.

Perhaps they are, and the same people who are lying about this report are also failing to mention the clarifications from the GOP. Orwell, after all, said that omission was the most powerful form of lie.

[Peach]

You sound like how I feel!

There are a few freepers whom I respect who say that it's too early, the administration will do what we want, it's a rope a dope strategy.

I can't quite buy into that, much as I'd like to. If you have the truth at hand, you USE it and don't wait while the entire country turns against you and the war.

Turning against the war is going to politicize it and will hurt our troops. I DO NOT want to see them treated the way we treated our Vietnam vets.

I do not want to see the DNC get their talking points and then when Bush tries to counter it someday down the line (if in fact these freepers are correct) people will have already tuned out and will not listen. Bad strategy if that is the strategy, imo

[MizSterious]

Surely we can't expect the almighty media to actually read these things before they compose the headlines? /sarcasm.

[TomGuy]

Benv: This information seemed to have made its way into the public venue.....

As Perky Katie might say, "There are those who say that...." or "Some say that...."

Could that be how it might have gotten into the public venue, Ben?

[Peach]

Rush is doing a good job today.

[familyofman]

"They HAVE found Iraq/AQ connections, but haven't found that Iraq was involved in 9/11....

And Bush has never claimed that Iraq was behind 9/11."

So does this mean that everyone is in agreement? Sure seems that way to me.

Connections = yes
Involved (SH) in 9/11 = no

Is that how it reads/seems to everyone else? The NYT editorial today also appeared to say the same thing (we could be in for some rough times here if all parties are in agreement - something like a planetary alignment and high tides).

[TomGuy]

That the Republicans are not out there COUNTERING these lies ticks me off to no end.

I wonder the same on many of the major issues. Where are the Pubbies? Makes on wonder why we even bother to support the Pubbies. Like it or not, at least you know where the Dems stand and you know the Dems will fight tooth and nail for what they believe/want. The Pubbies are.....where?

[Peach]

(we could be in for some rough times here if all parties are in agreement - something like a planetary alignment and high tides).

LOL

[mathluv]

Rummy has a press cibf this pm - around 2 about this.

[Dane]

Where are the Pubbies?

Rush just had a clip of President Bush rebuffing ben venistes, johnnie cochran trial lawyer like lies.

[sheltonmac]

Just as it changed from "no WMDs in Iraq" to "no stockpile of WMDs in Iraq"

As much as I despise the media, they certainly don't have a monopoly on spin. The administration clearly shifted its focus from "WMD" to "evidence of WMD programs." Employing that kind of tactic in order to reinforce one's argument is not unique.