Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheMightyQuinn
Just as it changed from "no WMDs in Iraq" to "no stockpile of WMDs in Iraq"

As much as I despise the media, they certainly don't have a monopoly on spin. The administration clearly shifted its focus from "WMD" to "evidence of WMD programs." Employing that kind of tactic in order to reinforce one's argument is not unique.

40 posted on 06/17/2004 9:49:36 AM PDT by sheltonmac ("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: sheltonmac
As much as I despise the media, they certainly don't have a monopoly on spin. The administration clearly shifted its focus from "WMD" to "evidence of WMD programs." Employing that kind of tactic in order to reinforce one's argument is not unique.

Whtaever, a simple question to you, though.

Is the world better off with saddam in power or not?

JMO, with reading your previous posts, you would be in the camp of saying that the would be better with saddam in power, kinda of like the liberal media.

44 posted on 06/17/2004 9:53:56 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson