Skip to comments.
Row over Kidman's film romp with youngster
Digitalspy ^
| 06/13/04
| Neil Wilkes
Posted on 06/13/2004 1:31:13 PM PDT by Pikamax
Row over Kidman's film romp with youngster 10:31 BST, Sunday 13th June 2004 -- by Neil Wilkes Nicole Kidman has been caught up in a row over a new film which features her kissing a ten-year-old boy while naked.
In the movie, called Birth, Kidman plays a widow who believes the boy to be a reincarnation of her husband.
Two scenes in particular have come under fire; in both, Kidman and the boy - Canadian child actor Cameron Bright - are "completely naked and caressing each other." In one of them, there is a close-up of " a very passionate kiss" as they sit in the bathtub together.
"The last thing on earth Nicole needs is a movie which is going to be jumped on by sickos and used in some perverse way to promote paedophilia," a source told the Daily Star Sunday today. "But truth is, the publicity department is already describing the movie as a nightmare. The producers, director and Nicole herself are likely to face a lot of flack."
It will cost film studo New Line around $50 million if they decide to axe the movie altoegther.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: culturewar; hollyweird; idiotparents; pedophilia; prosecuteher; romanpolanski
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next last
To: independentmind
As should every last person involved in the production.
To: Pikamax
I think Michael Jackson just found himself another character witness (and another potential playmate at the ranch).
22
posted on
06/13/2004 1:48:25 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: IronJack
There must be some profound meaning in it somewhere.
23
posted on
06/13/2004 1:48:42 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Lazamataz
Kidman is cruising for bubbly bath product endorsements marketed in Disney caricatures.
24
posted on
06/13/2004 1:49:06 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: Pikamax
Hollywood is controlled by 20 year old boys. What do you expect? They play their fantasies out every day...sex and violence .... but we just sit and do nothing.
25
posted on
06/13/2004 1:53:23 PM PDT
by
Hildy
( If you don't stand up for what's RIGHT, you'll settle for what's LEFT.)
To: Lazamataz
26
posted on
06/13/2004 1:54:22 PM PDT
by
AQGeiger
(Have you hugged your soldier today?)
To: Lazamataz
"I used to resist the notion that the liberal left's goal is to allow sex with minors."
I don't think that is their ultimate goal, but it is another way to destroy the traditional family and undermine all that is normal in the world. I'm sorry to say this, but the evil of the left can hardly be overstated.
What a shame Kidman had to get herself mixed up with this trash. My daughter really likes her. Remember the outrage over Andrian Lynne's (I think that's the name) version of Lolita? It was never released in US theaters and I believe the gal in that was a good deal older than 10.
27
posted on
06/13/2004 1:54:55 PM PDT
by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
To: Hildy
They play their fantasies out every day...sex and violence .... but we just sit and do nothing. I don't go to, or rent, their movies.
Life's pretty good without the garbage.
28
posted on
06/13/2004 1:55:59 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
To: Lazamataz
Just in case I didn't ask you yet, marry me.My goal is to ask every Freeperette.
Hoping that the Law of Large Numbers will kick in for you? :-)
To: Pikamax
Other than the cost & celebrity of the people involved, would anyone like to explain what EXACTLY is the difference between this, and child porn??
Would any of those apologists also want explain EACTLY what they mean by Art and "socially redeeming features"??
Also, to speculate what is different, and what the outcry would be, and why, if roles were reversed, and it was a beefcake & 10 YO girl in the otherwise identical scenes?
Not to imply that Kidman is not a good actress (she is), but taking this part, and playing the scenes, THEN worrying about 'bad publicity' reinforces my impression of her as an airhead.
30
posted on
06/13/2004 1:58:09 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: Pikamax
Other than the cost & celebrity of the people involved, would anyone like to explain what EXACTLY is the difference between this, and child porn??
Would any of those apologists also want explain EACTLY what they mean by Art and "socially redeeming features"??
Also, to speculate what is different, and what the outcry would be, and why, if roles were reversed, and it was a beefcake & 10 YO girl in the otherwise identical scenes?
Not to imply that Kidman is not a good actress (she is), but taking this part, and playing the scenes, THEN worrying about 'bad publicity' reinforces my impression of her as an airhead.
31
posted on
06/13/2004 1:59:33 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: Slings and Arrows
There is an old saw in sales ... 20% of your customers account for 80% of your business. Couple that with 1% of cold calls get results and we will find Laz rather scarce at FR due to his extra-curricular activites!
32
posted on
06/13/2004 2:00:55 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: ApplegateRanch
The planning for the movie probably took place before the great Janet Jackson fiasco. That has made Hollywood a bit nervous, I think.
If they release this movie, they should be indicted on pedophilia charges.
33
posted on
06/13/2004 2:03:05 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Cicero
If the scene was shot, they should be indicted. Who cares about a release.
To: Pikamax
Where was this movie shot, anyone know?
36
posted on
06/13/2004 2:05:10 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: tet68
Maybe they'd let me take his place?
As a healthy hetero male with all the equipment in the right place, you are not on Ms. Kidman's to-do list. Trust me.
37
posted on
06/13/2004 2:06:07 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(It's not often you see Johnny Mathis in the wild.)
To: sinkspur
Here's a hint: "cover story."
Here's another one: "beard."
38
posted on
06/13/2004 2:06:37 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(It's not often you see Johnny Mathis in the wild.)
To: Pikamax
Just when I thought these people could not disgust me any more than they have, they sink to an altogether new low.
Kidman is trash.
To: MHGinTN
I had no idea that being a Freeper would make one into a chick-magnet. I am so very glad that I joined...
40
posted on
06/13/2004 2:07:08 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Ronald Reagan - The first anti-terror President.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson