Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Bernard Shaw: Media Failed America By Not Showing Good Side of Reagan
CNN ^ | 6/11/04

Posted on 06/11/2004 10:49:11 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar

Edited on 06/11/2004 11:23:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

"We in the media failed the nation by not reporting these things about Reagan at the time.

"I have learned a lot about this side of Ronald Reagan...things I never new before. So I, too, have failed America."

[paraphrased]

More..

Bernard Shaw: "Can I say something that touches on a very sensitive issue? The news media, and how we failed to thoroughly cover and communicate the very essences we're talking about possessed by Ronald Reagan. What I've been reading and what I've been hearing, I did not get during his two terms in office. Or did I miss something?" Wolf Blitzer: "I think you're on to something, Bernie, uh.. "

Shaw: "I think we failed our viewers, listeners and readers to an appreciable extent. I can't quantify it, but I'll put it there. Because I certainly missed a lot."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: admission; admissionofguilt; againstinterests; bernardshaw; ccrm; cnn; deceit; epiphany; mediabias; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last
To: 11th Earl of Mar
I still remember when Shaw came back from Iraq during dessert storm. He refused to be debriefed he said he wanted to be fair to both sides.
181 posted on 06/11/2004 9:35:13 PM PDT by Brimack34 (The Left-Wing media hates America. Hate them back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Very cynical, but probably on the mark:

CNN is "campaigning". FOX is whipping their butts in the ratings - hell CNNfn is even ADVERTISING for views ON FOX NEWS.

So, like good liberals, they are "campaigning" to the center...(but still spin to the left). If the worst happens, and CNN takes the #1 spot over again, they'll be just as leftist as they ever were.

182 posted on 06/11/2004 9:39:36 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Bernard Shaw: "Can I say something that touches on a very sensitive issue? The news media, and how we failed to thoroughly cover and communicate the very essences we're talking about possessed by Ronald Reagan. What I've been reading and what I've been hearing, I did not get during his two terms in office. Or did I miss something?" Wolf Blitzer: "I think you're on to something, Bernie, uh.. "

Shaw: "I think we failed our viewers, listeners and readers to an appreciable extent. I can't quantify it, but I'll put it there. Because I certainly missed a lot."

And this is the media outlet who trumpet that they are the "most trusted in cable news" (or something like that). Off of this comment, I wouldn't trust these guys to find cow sh*t in a dairy barn!

183 posted on 06/11/2004 10:18:10 PM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Cool!


184 posted on 06/11/2004 11:00:25 PM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Conservatives in cemetaries around the nation are rolling over in unison right now.


185 posted on 06/11/2004 11:02:47 PM PDT by wardaddy (This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Goldberg or Shaw?

They are rather easily distinguishable.

Goldberg I'd expect.

Shaw would be a major surprise.


186 posted on 06/11/2004 11:05:12 PM PDT by wardaddy (This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Bernard Shaw: "Due to the fact that we have been caught with our pants down in our lies and distortions, I think it best we plead ignorance."


187 posted on 06/11/2004 11:25:39 PM PDT by SerpentDove (November 2004: Win One for the Gipper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Bernard Shaw cost Dukakis several million votes.
Probably more than Gerald Ford lost
by granting freedom to the Poles in that other famous debate.


188 posted on 06/11/2004 11:31:35 PM PDT by Allan (Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

To the moon.........one of these days......maybe today.


189 posted on 06/12/2004 12:04:35 AM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

How about a journalism degree meaning something...like a basic education in math, science, etc., so that one could at least begin to give accurate reports...whatever your field, I am sure that when the media has a story in your area of expertise, you end up laughing to keep from crying.


190 posted on 06/12/2004 2:36:45 AM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis
Shaw: "I think we failed our viewers, listeners and readers to an appreciable extent. I can't quantify it, but I'll put it there. Because I certainly missed a lot."

Instead of many of the cynical comments I've seen here, maybe we should take his comments at face value. I generally vilify liberals, but this sounds sincere...almost like an epiphany. Maybe, after seeing the outpouring of "love" expressed by the American people, he actually had change of heart. President Reagan, would have (and has) forgiven him the slight.

Besides, we can always go back to bashing him if he changes course!

191 posted on 06/12/2004 2:52:55 AM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

Shaw's comments/reporting were more balanced when he first started at CNN. After a while, CNN management slapped his wrists and he quickly fell into line with the rest of them, but he was not the same after that.


192 posted on 06/12/2004 2:58:02 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

Really? I thought the DA sounded like he got a revelation.


193 posted on 06/12/2004 3:26:53 AM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Bernard Shaw is saying that the press was mistaken. They were not mistaken. They were not and are not interested in truth -- only power.

The press works very hard to promote their people and their agenda, and they will say anything that they believe helps them. And they are very good at what they do.


194 posted on 06/12/2004 3:51:18 AM PDT by Puzzleman (Bush = Steadfast leadership in time of change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Tune in next week to hear what he has to say about W.


195 posted on 06/12/2004 3:53:56 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls - Proof that when the Main Stream Media wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sapper26

Don't forget their economic reporting in 1992. Soon as Clinton was in..no more recession. LIKE MAGIC.


196 posted on 06/12/2004 3:57:19 AM PDT by Luke21 (IK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: garandgal
Most times I try to give the benefit of the doubt to people, even journalists. However, I think I can sum this situation up this way. Bernie Goldberg had a change of heart, Bernie Shaw is just doing a CYA.

Shaw does get 1 point for being polite though. :-)

197 posted on 06/12/2004 4:10:07 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty (You're not the boss of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: alnick

...hear, hear...

***
Of course.
Brain malfunction here....


198 posted on 06/12/2004 6:33:01 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

I wasn't commenting on your spelling. I was teasing you about the multiple posts. They made me smile. Thanks.


199 posted on 06/12/2004 6:56:28 AM PDT by alnick (Goodbye, Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Don't forget their economic reporting in 1992. Soon as Clinton was in..no more recession.

The recession that helped Bush Sr. loose, was turned around before he went out. The sleepers and sinkmeisters the media love so much, eventually got it going in the wrong direction again.

Now it's such a bad thing that war in Iraq. But get Kerry in and we'll be seeing red carpet and interviews with laughing children. America will be great again. Vote Kerry.

200 posted on 06/12/2004 11:30:48 AM PDT by alrea (tax cuts caused massive job growth in the 80's and again this year; one party wants to raise taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson