Posted on 06/09/2004 5:34:54 AM PDT by runningbear
Ron Grantski didn't leave at home a pregnant wife who had been having dizzy spells and shortness of breath. And he was close to home on his own fishing trip.
Thanks, Jackie. You made the point better than I did.
There's no lack of mortar (cement) in this case.
If you don't mind, I'd like to repeat that question you asked: If the word was only mentioned once at 9:40, how could Snott have heard it if he left at 9:30?
Comprehension problems today! Moving in 3 weeks and trying to get organized AND keep up with the news!
What did the Petersons do to mock Ron?
This is unbelievable!
Now I'm confused. I thought the Dec 23rd meringue segment was at 9:40am???
(Can you tell I'm falling behind? LOL!)
I had no idea that they weren't married.
Excellent timetable here...check it out ald let me know what you think.
http://board2.courttv.com/showthread.php?s=79a78e2805b2902c63669add2acb70c5&threadid=131771
The impression this person was trying to give is that when Scott said he told Laci about the affair with Amber it could have been true that he did tell her and she just kept it to herself like years ago.
Had you heard any of this?
Yes I heard this...but a bit of spin is put on it every time it's reported by the media.
This is what was testified to...by Sharon.
AFTER Laci's disappearance was when Sharon was told that Laci knew of an affair that Snott had early in their marriage.
Laci never told her family or spoke of it to them....
BUT obviously she told someone, that someone told Sharon AFTER Laci went "missing."
Moving and organized...I'm impressed!
Check out THIS update thread...Beth Karras giving update on testimony!
Kempel On Stand: Suspicious For 3 Separate Reasons
http://board2.courttv.com/showthread.php?s=d92518009adccdd93ca91774b077f5a6&threadid=131878
However, Beth Karas on CourtTV keeps referring to him as her husband and Laci's stepfather. If they are not married, he would not be Laci's stepfather.
Grrrr. They're despicable. I thought Ron said that 9:30am is the time he RETURNS from fishing.
I think the prosecution, for one thing, just wants to show that Scott was lying b/c Scott is on record as having said he left the house at 9:30.
So, first, his defense says he did see the brief mention of meringue on the Martha show on Dec. 24. That mention was made at 9:40. So he couldn't have seen it AND have left the house at 9:30. So... he has lied.
Second, the neighbor saw his truck still at the house at 9:39. But Scott is on record as saying he left the house at 9:30. So... he has lied.
To lie is to have something to hide. The jury is left to infer WHAT he had to hide.
Finally, the fact that the cell tower which serves his HOME has a record of a call made by him at 10:08 on the 24th, tells us that he had not left home very much b/f 10:08. That's a third thing that shows he lied when he said he left home at 9:30 on the 24th.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.