[RGSpincich]

This could get interesting. The friend down the street drove by at 9:39A and saw both cars. This will be used to show that he didn't leave at 9:30A. For reasons that hopefully will become apparent, the prosecution wants to back/slow his time line up. In doing so it may also bolster his story about Laci watching MS.

[Jackie-O]

Excellent timetable here...check it out ald let me know what you think.
http://board2.courttv.com/showthread.php?s=79a78e2805b2902c63669add2acb70c5&threadid=131771

[Devil_Anse]

I think the prosecution, for one thing, just wants to show that Scott was lying b/c Scott is on record as having said he left the house at 9:30.

So, first, his defense says he did see the brief mention of meringue on the Martha show on Dec. 24. That mention was made at 9:40. So he couldn't have seen it AND have left the house at 9:30. So... he has lied.

Second, the neighbor saw his truck still at the house at 9:39. But Scott is on record as saying he left the house at 9:30. So... he has lied.

To lie is to have something to hide. The jury is left to infer WHAT he had to hide.

Finally, the fact that the cell tower which serves his HOME has a record of a call made by him at 10:08 on the 24th, tells us that he had not left home very much b/f 10:08. That's a third thing that shows he lied when he said he left home at 9:30 on the 24th.